Literature DB >> 30342637

Community Education and Engagement in Family Planning: Updated Systematic Review.

Anjana E Sharma1, Brittni N Frederiksen2, Nikita M Malcolm3, Julia M Rollison3, Marion W Carter4.   

Abstract

CONTEXT: Community education and engagement are important for informing family planning projects. The objective of this study was to update two prior systematic reviews assessing the impact of community education and engagement interventions on family planning outcomes. EVIDENCE ACQUISITION: Sixteen electronic databases were searched for studies relevant to a priori determined inclusion/exclusion criteria in high development settings, published from March 2011 through April 2016, updating two reviews that included studies from 1985 through February 2011. EVIDENCE SYNTHESIS: Nine relevant studies were included in this updated review related to community education, in addition to 17 from the prior review. No new community engagement studies met inclusion criteria, as occurred in the prior review. Of new studies, community education modalities included mass media, print/mail, web-based, text messaging, and interpersonal interventions. One study on mass media intervention demonstrated a positive impact on reducing teen and unintended pregnancies. Three of four studies on interpersonal interventions demonstrated positive impacts on medium-term family planning outcomes, such as contraception and condom use. Three new studies demonstrated mostly positive, but inconsistent, results on short-term family planning outcomes.
CONCLUSIONS: Findings from this systematic review update are in line with a previous review showing the positive impact of community education using traditional modalities on short-term family planning outcomes, identifying additional impacts on long-term outcomes, and highlighting new evidence for education using modern modalities, such as text messaging and web-based education. More research is necessary to provide a stronger evidence base for directing community education and engagement efforts in family planning contexts. THEME INFORMATION: This article is part of a theme issue entitled Updating the Systematic Reviews Used to Develop the U.S. Recommendations for Providing Quality Family Planning Services, which is sponsored by the Office of Population Affairs, U.S. Department of Health and Human Services.
Copyright © 2018. Published by Elsevier Inc.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2018        PMID: 30342637      PMCID: PMC6753778          DOI: 10.1016/j.amepre.2018.06.022

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Prev Med        ISSN: 0749-3797            Impact factor:   5.043


  47 in total

1.  Evaluation of a media campaign to increase knowledge about emergency contraception.

Authors:  J Trussell; J Koenig; B Vaughan; F Stewart
Journal:  Contraception       Date:  2001-02       Impact factor: 3.375

2.  Developing, implementing, and evaluating a condom promotion program targeting sexually active adolescents.

Authors:  M Alstead; M Campsmith; C S Halley; K Hartfield; G Goldbaum; R W Wood
Journal:  AIDS Educ Prev       Date:  1999-12

3.  A successful strategy. Garnering community support for contraceptives services to be provided in a school-based health center.

Authors:  K Swartwout; J Russell
Journal:  J Sch Nurs       Date:  1999-12       Impact factor: 2.835

4.  Impact evaluation of the "not me, not now" abstinence-oriented, adolescent pregnancy prevention communications program, Monroe County, New York.

Authors:  A S Doniger; E Adams; C A Utter; J S Riley
Journal:  J Health Commun       Date:  2001 Jan-Mar

5.  Barriers to the involvement of clients in family planning service development: lessons learnt from experience.

Authors:  Paula Baraitser; Geraldine Blake; Kirsty Collander Brown; Johanna Piper
Journal:  J Fam Plann Reprod Health Care       Date:  2003-10

6.  User involvement in the planning and delivery of mental health services: a cross-sectional survey of service users and providers.

Authors:  M J Crawford; T Aldridge; K Bhui; D Rutter; C Manley; T Weaver; P Tyrer; N Fulop
Journal:  Acta Psychiatr Scand       Date:  2003-06       Impact factor: 6.392

7.  Emergency contraceptive pills in Sweden: evaluation of an information campaign.

Authors:  Margareta Larsson; Karin Eurenius; Ragnar Westerling; Tanja Tydén
Journal:  BJOG       Date:  2004-08       Impact factor: 6.531

8.  The POWER campaign for promotion of female and male condoms: audience research and campaign development.

Authors:  Sheana Salyers Bull; Jennifer Cohen; Charlene Ortiz; Tom Evans
Journal:  Health Commun       Date:  2002

9.  Developing a culturally appropriate video to promote dual-method use by urban teens: rationale and methodology.

Authors:  Carol F Roye; Margaret Hudson
Journal:  AIDS Educ Prev       Date:  2003-04

10.  Quality, mainstream services with proactive and targeted outreach: a model of contraceptive service provision for young people.

Authors:  Paula Baraitser; Rachael Fettiplace; Frances Dolan; Helen Massil; Sarah Cowley
Journal:  J Fam Plann Reprod Health Care       Date:  2002-04
View more
  4 in total

1.  Evaluating the effectiveness of enhanced family planning education on knowledge and use of family planning in fishing communities of Lake Victoria in Uganda: a randomized controlled trial.

Authors:  Annet Nanvubya; Rhoda K Wanyenze; Andrew Abaasa; Teddy Nakaweesa; Juliet Mpendo; Barbarah Kawoozo; Francis Matovu; Sarah Nabukalu; Geoffrey Omoding; Jed Kaweesi; John Ndugga; Bernard Bagaya; Kundai Chinyenze; Matt A Price; Jean Pierre Van Geertruyden
Journal:  BMC Health Serv Res       Date:  2022-04-14       Impact factor: 2.908

Review 2.  Digital Formats for Community Participation in Health Promotion and Prevention Activities: A Scoping Review.

Authors:  Claudia Schroeer; Stephan Voss; Caroline Jung-Sievers; Michaela Coenen
Journal:  Front Public Health       Date:  2021-11-16

3.  An evaluation of the Be Your Own Baby public awareness campaign.

Authors:  Daniel Marthey; Hira Rashid; Liyang Xie; Michel Boudreaux
Journal:  Health Serv Res       Date:  2021-07-01       Impact factor: 3.734

4.  Evaluation of a gender synchronized family planning intervention for married couples in rural India: The CHARM2 cluster randomized control trial.

Authors:  Anita Raj; Mohan Ghule; Nicole E Johns; Madhusudana Battala; Shahina Begum; Anvita Dixit; Florin Vaida; Niranjan Saggurti; Jay G Silverman; Sarah Averbach
Journal:  EClinicalMedicine       Date:  2022-03-05
  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.