Literature DB >> 18564347

Reproductive compensation.

Patricia Adair Gowaty1.   

Abstract

The reproductive compensation hypothesis says that individuals constrained by ecological or social forces to reproduce with partners they do not prefer compensate for likely offspring viability deficits. The reproductive compensation hypothesis assumes that (i) pathogens and parasites evolve more rapidly than their hosts, (ii) mate preferences predict variation in health and viability of offspring, (iii) social and ecological factors keep some individuals from mating with their preferred partners (some are constrained to mate with partners they do not prefer), (iv) all individuals may be induced to compensate, so that (v) variation in compensation is due to environmental and developmental factors affecting between-individual abilities to express compensatory mechanisms. Selection favouring compensation may act through variation in prezygotic physiological mechanisms, zygotic mechanisms, or parental care to eggs or young that enhance offspring health, increasing the likelihood that some offspring survive to reproductive age, often at a survival cost to the parents. Compensation may be through increased number of eggs laid or offspring born, a compensatory effort working during a single reproductive bout that sometimes will match the number of offspring surviving to reproductive age produced by unconstrained parents during the same bout. The reproductive compensation hypothesis therefore predicts trade-offs in components of fitness for breeders, such that parents constrained to mating with a nonpreferred partner, but who compensate sometimes match their current productivity (number of offspring at reproductive age) to unconstrained parents (those breeding with their preferred partners), and, when all else is equal, die faster than unconstrained parents. The reproductive compensation hypothesis emphasizes that reproductive competition is not just between constrained and unconstrained individuals, but also among constrained individuals who do and do not compensate. The reproductive compensation hypothesis may thus explain previously unexplained between-population and within-population, between-individual variation in reproductive success, survival, physiology and behaviour.

Mesh:

Year:  2008        PMID: 18564347     DOI: 10.1111/j.1420-9101.2008.01559.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Evol Biol        ISSN: 1010-061X            Impact factor:   2.411


  17 in total

1.  The influence of maternal effects on indirect benefits associated with polyandry.

Authors:  Clarissa M House; Bronwyn H Bleakley; Craig A Walling; Thomas A R Price; Clare E Stamper; Allen J Moore
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2010-10-06       Impact factor: 5.349

2.  Reproductive investment when mate quality varies: differential allocation versus reproductive compensation.

Authors:  W Edwin Harris; Tobias Uller
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  2009-04-27       Impact factor: 6.237

Review 3.  Reproductive decisions under ecological constraints: it's about time.

Authors:  Patricia Adair Gowaty; Stephen P Hubbell
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2009-06-15       Impact factor: 11.205

4.  Strategic female reproductive investment in response to male attractiveness in birds.

Authors:  Terézia Horváthová; Shinichi Nakagawa; Tobias Uller
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2011-06-01       Impact factor: 5.349

5.  Postmating transcriptional changes in reproductive tracts of con- and heterospecifically mated Drosophila mojavensis females.

Authors:  Jeremy M Bono; Luciano M Matzkin; Erin S Kelleher; Therese A Markow
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2011-04-25       Impact factor: 11.205

Review 6.  Epigenetics and the origins of paternal effects.

Authors:  James P Curley; Rahia Mashoodh; Frances A Champagne
Journal:  Horm Behav       Date:  2010-07-08       Impact factor: 3.587

7.  Females allocate differentially to offspring size and number in response to male effects on female and offspring fitness.

Authors:  Holly K Kindsvater; Suzanne H Alonzo
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2014-01-29       Impact factor: 5.349

8.  Postnatal nutrition influences male attractiveness and promotes plasticity in male mating preferences.

Authors:  José C Noguera; Neil B Metcalfe; Pat Monaghan
Journal:  Naturwissenschaften       Date:  2017-11-14

9.  Male genotype influences female reproductive investment in Drosophila melanogaster.

Authors:  Alison Pischedda; Andrew D Stewart; Monica K Little; William R Rice
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2010-12-15       Impact factor: 5.349

10.  Reproductive compensation in broad-nosed pipefish females.

Authors:  Ines Braga Goncalves; Kenyon B Mobley; Ingrid Ahnesjö; Gry Sagebakken; Adam G Jones; Charlotta Kvarnemo
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2010-01-27       Impact factor: 5.349

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.