Literature DB >> 18564053

On why left events are the right ones: neural mechanisms underlying the left-hemifield advantage in rapid serial visual presentation.

Rolf Verleger1, Andreas Sprenger, Sina Gebauer, Michaela Fritzmannova, Monique Friedrich, Stefanie Kraft, Piotr Jaśkowski.   

Abstract

When simultaneous series of stimuli are rapidly presented left and right, containing two target stimuli T1 and T2, T2 is much better identified when presented in the left than in the right hemifield. Here, this effect was replicated, even when shifts of gaze were controlled, and was only partially compensated when T1 side provided the cue where to expect T2. Electrophysiological measurement revealed earlier latencies of T1- and T2-evoked N2(pc) peaks at the right than at the left visual cortex, and larger right-hemisphere T2-evoked N2(pc) amplitudes when T2 closely followed T1. These findings suggest that the right hemisphere was better able to single out the targets in time. Further, sustained contralateral slow shifts remained active after T1 for longer time at the right than at the left visual cortex, and developed more consistently at the right visual cortex when expecting T2 on the contralateral side. These findings might reflect better capacity of right-hemisphere visual working memory. These findings about the neurophysiological underpinnings of the large right-hemisphere advantage in this complex visual task might help elucidating the mechanisms responsible for the severe disturbance of hemineglect following damage to the right hemisphere.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2009        PMID: 18564053     DOI: 10.1162/jocn.2009.21038

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Cogn Neurosci        ISSN: 0898-929X            Impact factor:   3.225


  14 in total

1.  The left visual-field advantage in rapid visual presentation is amplified rather than reduced by posterior-parietal rTMS.

Authors:  Rolf Verleger; Friderike Möller; Michał Kuniecki; Kamila Smigasiewicz; Sergiu Groppa; Hartwig R Siebner
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2010-04-17       Impact factor: 1.972

2.  On the time course of attentional focusing in older adults.

Authors:  Lisa N Jefferies; Alexa B Roggeveen; James T Enns; Patrick J Bennett; Allison B Sekuler; Vincent Di Lollo
Journal:  Psychol Res       Date:  2013-12-15

Review 3.  What processes are disrupted during the attentional blink? An integrative review of event-related potential research.

Authors:  Alon Zivony; Dominique Lamy
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2021-07-21

4.  The efficiency of attentional networks in early and late bilinguals: the role of age of acquisition.

Authors:  Lily Tao; Anna Marzecová; Marcus Taft; Dariusz Asanowicz; Zofia Wodniecka
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2011-06-10

5.  Neuro-cognitive mechanisms of conscious and unconscious visual perception: From a plethora of phenomena to general principles.

Authors:  Markus Kiefer; Ulrich Ansorge; John-Dylan Haynes; Fred Hamker; Uwe Mattler; Rolf Verleger; Michael Niedeggen
Journal:  Adv Cogn Psychol       Date:  2011-12-01

6.  Good vibrations, bad vibrations: Oscillatory brain activity in the attentional blink.

Authors:  Jolanda Janson; Cornelia Kranczioch
Journal:  Adv Cogn Psychol       Date:  2011-12-22

7.  Cerebral Asymmetry of fMRI-BOLD Responses to Visual Stimulation.

Authors:  Anders Hougaard; Bettina Hagström Jensen; Faisal Mohammad Amin; Egill Rostrup; Michael B Hoffmann; Messoud Ashina
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2015-05-18       Impact factor: 3.240

8.  Differences between visual hemifields in identifying rapidly presented target stimuli: letters and digits, faces, and shapes.

Authors:  Dariusz Asanowicz; Kamila Smigasiewicz; Rolf Verleger
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2013-07-19

9.  No prior entry for threat-related faces: evidence from temporal order judgments.

Authors:  Antonio Schettino; Tom Loeys; Gilles Pourtois
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2013-04-30       Impact factor: 3.240

10.  Cooperation or competition of the two hemispheres in processing characters presented at vertical midline.

Authors:  Rolf Verleger; Marie Dittmer; Kamila Smigasiewicz
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2013-02-22       Impact factor: 3.240

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.