Literature DB >> 18563425

Position of human chromosomes is conserved in mouse nuclei indicating a species-independent mechanism for maintaining genome organization.

Kundan Sengupta1, Jordi Camps, Priya Mathews, Linda Barenboim-Stapleton, Quang Tri Nguyen, Michael J Difilippantonio, Thomas Ried.   

Abstract

The nonrandom positioning of chromosome territories in eukaryotic cells is largely correlated with gene density and is conserved throughout evolution. Gene-rich chromosomes are predominantly central, while gene-poor chromosomes are peripherally localized in interphase nuclei. We previously demonstrated that artificially introduced human chromosomes assume a position equivalent to their endogenous homologues in the diploid colon cancer cell line DLD-1. These chromosomal aneuploidies result in a significant increase in transcript levels, suggesting a relationship between genomic copy number, gene expression, and chromosome position. We previously proposed that each chromosome is marked by a "zip code" that determines its nonrandom position in the nucleus. In this paper, we investigated (1) whether mouse nuclei recognize such determinants of nuclear position on human chromosomes to facilitate their distinct partitioning and (2) if chromosome positioning and transcriptional activity remain coupled under these trans-species conditions. Using three-dimensional fluorescence in situ hybridization, confocal microscopy, and gene expression profiling, we show (1) that gene-poor and gene-rich human chromosomes maintain their divergent but conserved positions in mouse-human hybrid nuclei and (2) that a foreign human chromosome is actively transcribed in mouse nuclei. Our results suggest a species-independent conserved mechanism for the nonrandom positioning of chromosomes in the three-dimensional interphase nucleus.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2008        PMID: 18563425      PMCID: PMC2614925          DOI: 10.1007/s00412-008-0171-7

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Chromosoma        ISSN: 0009-5915            Impact factor:   4.316


  29 in total

Review 1.  Chromosome territories, nuclear architecture and gene regulation in mammalian cells.

Authors:  T Cremer; C Cremer
Journal:  Nat Rev Genet       Date:  2001-04       Impact factor: 53.242

2.  Arrangements of macro- and microchromosomes in chicken cells.

Authors:  F A Habermann; M Cremer; J Walter; G Kreth; J von Hase; K Bauer; J Wienberg; C Cremer; T Cremer; I Solovei
Journal:  Chromosome Res       Date:  2001       Impact factor: 5.239

3.  Evolutionary conservation of chromosome territory arrangements in cell nuclei from higher primates.

Authors:  Hideyuki Tanabe; Stefan Müller; Michaela Neusser; Johann von Hase; Enzo Calcagno; Marion Cremer; Irina Solovei; Christoph Cremer; Thomas Cremer
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2002-04-02       Impact factor: 11.205

Review 4.  The dynamics of chromosome organization and gene regulation.

Authors:  David L Spector
Journal:  Annu Rev Biochem       Date:  2003       Impact factor: 23.643

5.  Construction of 700 human/mouse A9 monochromosomal hybrids and analysis of imprinted genes on human chromosome 6.

Authors:  J Inoue; K Mitsuya; S Maegawa; H Kugoh; M Kadota; D Okamura; T Shinohara; S Nishihara; S Takehara; K Yamauchi; T C Schulz; M Oshimura
Journal:  J Hum Genet       Date:  2001       Impact factor: 3.172

6.  Human monochromosome hybrid cell panel characterized by FISH in the JCRB/HSRRB.

Authors:  H Tanabe; Y Nakagawa; D Minegishi; K Hashimoto; N Tanaka; M Oshimura; T Sofuni; H Mizusawa
Journal:  Chromosome Res       Date:  2000       Impact factor: 5.239

7.  Radial chromatin positioning is shaped by local gene density, not by gene expression.

Authors:  Katrin Küpper; Alexandra Kölbl; Dorothee Biener; Sandra Dittrich; Johann von Hase; Tobias Thormeyer; Heike Fiegler; Nigel P Carter; Michael R Speicher; Thomas Cremer; Marion Cremer
Journal:  Chromosoma       Date:  2007-02-27       Impact factor: 4.316

8.  Chromosome transfer induced aneuploidy results in complex dysregulation of the cellular transcriptome in immortalized and cancer cells.

Authors:  Madhvi B Upender; Jens K Habermann; Lisa M McShane; Edward L Korn; J Carl Barrett; Michael J Difilippantonio; Thomas Ried
Journal:  Cancer Res       Date:  2004-10-01       Impact factor: 12.701

9.  Comparative analysis of the functional genome architecture of animal and plant cell nuclei.

Authors:  Christoph Mayr; Zuzana Jasencakova; Armin Meister; Ingo Schubert; Daniele Zink
Journal:  Chromosome Res       Date:  2003       Impact factor: 4.620

10.  Inheritance of gene density-related higher order chromatin arrangements in normal and tumor cell nuclei.

Authors:  Marion Cremer; Katrin Küpper; Babett Wagler; Leah Wizelman; Johann von Hase; Yanina Weiland; Ludwika Kreja; Joachim Diebold; Michael R Speicher; Thomas Cremer
Journal:  J Cell Biol       Date:  2003-09-01       Impact factor: 10.539

View more
  10 in total

Review 1.  Nuclear structure, organization, and oncogenesis.

Authors:  Amanda L Rynearson; Caroline R Sussman
Journal:  J Gastrointest Cancer       Date:  2011-06

2.  Unrepaired DNA damage facilitates elimination of uniparental chromosomes in interspecific hybrid cells.

Authors:  Zheng Wang; Hao Yin; Lei Lv; Yingying Feng; Shaopeng Chen; Junting Liang; Yun Huang; Xiaohua Jiang; Hanwei Jiang; Ihtisham Bukhari; Lijun Wu; Howard J Cooke; Qinghua Shi
Journal:  Cell Cycle       Date:  2014-03-04       Impact factor: 4.534

3.  Transcription-dependent radial distribution of TCF7L2 regulated genes in chromosome territories.

Authors:  Keyvan Torabi; Darawalee Wangsa; Immaculada Ponsa; Markus Brown; Anna Bosch; Maria Vila-Casadesús; Tatiana S Karpova; Maria Calvo; Antoni Castells; Rosa Miró; Thomas Ried; Jordi Camps
Journal:  Chromosoma       Date:  2017-03-25       Impact factor: 4.316

4.  Can 3D diploid genome reconstruction from unphased Hi-C data be salvaged?

Authors:  Mark R Segal
Journal:  NAR Genom Bioinform       Date:  2022-05-12

5.  Spatial organization of the mouse genome and its role in recurrent chromosomal translocations.

Authors:  Yu Zhang; Rachel Patton McCord; Yu-Jui Ho; Bryan R Lajoie; Dominic G Hildebrand; Aline C Simon; Michael S Becker; Frederick W Alt; Job Dekker
Journal:  Cell       Date:  2012-02-16       Impact factor: 41.582

6.  Systems-level chromosomal parameters represent a suprachromosomal basis for the non-random chromosomal arrangement in human interphase nuclei.

Authors:  Sarosh N Fatakia; Ishita S Mehta; Basuthkar J Rao
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2016-11-15       Impact factor: 4.379

Review 7.  Three-dimensional organization and dynamics of the genome.

Authors:  Przemyslaw Szalaj; Dariusz Plewczynski
Journal:  Cell Biol Toxicol       Date:  2018-03-22       Impact factor: 6.691

8.  Evaluating annotations of an Agilent expression chip suggests that many features cannot be interpreted.

Authors:  E Michael Gertz; Kundan Sengupta; Michael J Difilippantonio; Thomas Ried; Alejandro A Schäffer
Journal:  BMC Genomics       Date:  2009-11-30       Impact factor: 3.969

9.  HAC stability in murine cells is influenced by nuclear localization and chromatin organization.

Authors:  Daniela Moralli; David Y L Chan; Andrew Jefferson; Emanuela V Volpi; Zoia L Monaco
Journal:  BMC Cell Biol       Date:  2009-03-06       Impact factor: 4.241

10.  Positioning of chromosomes in human spermatozoa is determined by ordered centromere arrangement.

Authors:  Olga S Mudrak; Igor B Nazarov; Estella L Jones; Andrei O Zalensky
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2012-12-27       Impact factor: 3.240

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.