Literature DB >> 18563326

Evaluation of myocardial viability after myocardial infarction with intravenous real-time myocardial contrast echocardiography.

Weihui Shentu1, Youbin Deng, Runqing Huang, Peng Li, Xiang Wei, Haoyi Yang, Yun Zhang, Li Xiong, Fen Yu, Yuhan Wu.   

Abstract

The myocardial viability after myocardial infarction was evaluated by intravenous myocardial contrast echocardiography. Intravenous real-time myocardial contrast echocardiography was performed on 18 patients with myocardial infarction before coronary revascularization. Follow-up echocardiography was performed 3 months after coronary revascularization. Segmental wall motion was assessed using 18-segment LV model and classified as normal, hypokinesis, akinesis and dyskinesis. Viable myocardium was defined by evident improvement of segmental wall motion 3 months after coronary revascularization. Myocardial perfusion was assessed by visual interpretation and divided into 3 conditions: homogeneous opacification; partial or reduced opacification or subendocardial contrast defect; contrast defect. The former two conditions were used as the standard to define the viable myocardium. The results showed that 109 abnormal wall motion segments were detected among 18 patients with myocardial infarction, including 47 segments of hypokinesis, 56 segments of akinesis and 6 segments of dyskinesis. The wall motion of 2 segments with hypokinesis before coronary revascularization which showed homogeneous opacification, 14 of 24 segments with hypokinese and 20 of 24 segments with akinese before coronary revascularization which showed partial or reduced opacification or subendocardial contrast defect was improved 3 months after coronary revascularization. In our study, the sensitivity and specificity of evaluation of myocardial viability after myocardial infarction by intravenous real-time myocardial contrast echocardiography were 94.7% and 78.9%, respectively. It was concluded that intravenous real-time myocardial contrast echocardiography could accurately evaluate myocardial viability after myocardial infarction.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2008        PMID: 18563326     DOI: 10.1007/s11596-008-0314-3

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Huazhong Univ Sci Technolog Med Sci        ISSN: 1672-0733


  10 in total

1.  Lack of myocardial perfusion immediately after successful thrombolysis. A predictor of poor recovery of left ventricular function in anterior myocardial infarction.

Authors:  H Ito; T Tomooka; N Sakai; H Yu; Y Higashino; K Fujii; T Masuyama; A Kitabatake; T Minamino
Journal:  Circulation       Date:  1992-05       Impact factor: 29.690

2.  Knowledge of perfusion and contractile reserve improves the predictive value of recovery of regional myocardial function postrevascularization: a study using the combination of myocardial contrast echocardiography and dobutamine echocardiography.

Authors:  M F Meza; S Ramee; T Collins; D Stapleton; R V Milani; J P Murgo; J Cheirif
Journal:  Circulation       Date:  1997-11-18       Impact factor: 29.690

3.  Assessment of myocardial postreperfusion viability by intravenous myocardial contrast echocardiography: analysis of the intensity and texture of opacification.

Authors:  K Ohmori; B Cotter; E Leistad; V Bhargava; P L Wolf; K Mizushige; A N DeMaria
Journal:  Circulation       Date:  2001-04-17       Impact factor: 29.690

Review 4.  18-Fluorodeoxyglucose imaging with positron emission tomography and single photon emission computed tomography: cardiac applications.

Authors:  J J Bax; J A Patton; D Poldermans; A Elhendy; M P Sandler
Journal:  Semin Nucl Med       Date:  2000-10       Impact factor: 4.446

5.  Detection of myocardial viability by contrast echocardiography in acute infarction predicts recovery of resting function and contractile reserve.

Authors:  Eduardo Balcells; Eric R Powers; Wolfgang Lepper; Todd Belcik; Kevin Wei; Michael Ragosta; Habib Samady; Jonathan R Lindner
Journal:  J Am Coll Cardiol       Date:  2003-03-05       Impact factor: 24.094

6.  Evaluation of transmural myocardial perfusion by ultra-harmonic myocardial contrast echocardiography in reperfused acute myocardial infarction.

Authors:  Hiroshi Wada; Takanori Yasu; Hiroyuki Kotsuka; Yuhki Hayakawa; Yoshiaki Tsukamoto; Nobuhiko Kobayashi; Takeshi Ishida; Yasuyuki Kobayashi; Norifumi Kubo; Masanobu Kawakami; Muneyasu Saito
Journal:  Circ J       Date:  2005-09       Impact factor: 2.993

7.  Comparison of myocardial contrast echocardiography and low-dose dobutamine stress echocardiography in predicting recovery of left ventricular function after coronary revascularization in chronic ischemic heart disease.

Authors:  C R deFilippi; D L Willett; W N Irani; E J Eichhorn; C E Velasco; P A Grayburn
Journal:  Circulation       Date:  1995-11-15       Impact factor: 29.690

8.  Attenuation-corrected 99mTc-tetrofosmin single-photon emission computed tomography in the detection of viable myocardium: comparison with positron emission tomography using 18F-fluorodeoxyglucose.

Authors:  I Matsunari; G Böning; S I Ziegler; S G Nekolla; J C Stollfuss; I Kosa; E P Ficaro; M Schwaiger
Journal:  J Am Coll Cardiol       Date:  1998-10       Impact factor: 24.094

9.  Microvascular structural correlates of myocardial contrast echocardiography in patients with coronary artery disease and left ventricular dysfunction: implications for the assessment of myocardial hibernation.

Authors:  Sarah Shimoni; Nikolaos G Frangogiannis; Constadina J Aggeli; Kesavan Shan; Miguel A Quinones; Rafael Espada; George V Letsou; Gerald M Lawrie; William L Winters; Michael J Reardon; William A Zoghbi
Journal:  Circulation       Date:  2002-08-20       Impact factor: 29.690

10.  Ultrastructural evidence of microvascular damage and myocardial cell injury after coronary artery occlusion: which comes first?

Authors:  R A Kloner; R E Rude; N Carlson; P R Maroko; L W DeBoer; E Braunwald
Journal:  Circulation       Date:  1980-11       Impact factor: 29.690

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.