Literature DB >> 18562645

Evolution of fitnesses in structured populations with correlated environments.

Bastiaan Star1, Meredith V Trotter, Hamish G Spencer.   

Abstract

The outcome of selection in structured populations with spatially varying selection pressures depends on the interaction of two factors: the level of gene flow and the amount of heterogeneity among the demes. Here we investigate the effect of three different levels of spatial heterogeneity on the levels of genetic polymorphisms for different levels of gene flow, using a construction approach in which a population is constantly bombarded with new mutations. We further compare the relative importance of two kinds of balancing selection (heterozygote advantage and selection arising from spatial heterogeneity), the level of adaptation and the stability of the resulting polymorphic equilibria. The different levels of environmental heterogeneity and gene flow have a large influence on the final level of polymorphism. Both factors also influence the relative importance of the two kinds of balancing selection in the maintenance of variation. In particular, selection arising from spatial heterogeneity does not appear to be an important form of balancing selection for the most homogeneous scenario. The level of adaptation is highest for low levels of gene flow and, at those levels, remarkably similar for the different levels of spatial heterogeneity, whereas for higher levels of gene flow the level of adaptation is substantially reduced.

Mesh:

Year:  2008        PMID: 18562645      PMCID: PMC2475747          DOI: 10.1534/genetics.108.087817

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Genetics        ISSN: 0016-6731            Impact factor:   4.562


  11 in total

1.  Evolution of migration under kin selection and local adaptation.

Authors:  Sylvain Billiard; Thomas Lenormand
Journal:  Evolution       Date:  2005-01       Impact factor: 3.694

2.  Multiallelic selection polymorphism.

Authors:  Thomas Nagylaki; Yuan Lou
Journal:  Theor Popul Biol       Date:  2005-12-15       Impact factor: 1.570

3.  Evolution under the multiallelic Levene model.

Authors:  Thomas Nagylaki; Yuan Lou
Journal:  Theor Popul Biol       Date:  2006-05-11       Impact factor: 1.570

4.  Evolution of fitnesses and allele frequencies in a population with spatially heterogeneous selection pressures.

Authors:  Bastiaan Star; Rick J Stoffels; Hamish G Spencer
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2007-10-18       Impact factor: 4.562

5.  Evolution under multiallelic migration-selection models.

Authors:  Thomas Nagylaki; Yuan Lou
Journal:  Theor Popul Biol       Date:  2007-03-18       Impact factor: 1.570

6.  Single-locus polymorphism in a heterogeneous two-deme model.

Authors:  Bastiaan Star; Rick J Stoffels; Hamish G Spencer
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2007-05-04       Impact factor: 4.562

7.  Natural selection in populations subject to a migration load.

Authors:  Daniel I Bolnick; Patrik Nosil
Journal:  Evolution       Date:  2007-09       Impact factor: 3.694

8.  Heterosis as an explanation for large amounts of genic polymorphism.

Authors:  R C Lewontin; L R Ginzburg; S D Tuljapurkar
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  1978-01       Impact factor: 4.562

9.  Polymorphism in a varied environment: how robust are the models?

Authors:  J M Smith; R Hoekstra
Journal:  Genet Res       Date:  1980-02       Impact factor: 1.588

10.  Molecular-level variation affects population growth in a butterfly metapopulation.

Authors:  Ilkka Hanski; Ilik Saccheri
Journal:  PLoS Biol       Date:  2006-04-25       Impact factor: 8.029

View more
  3 in total

1.  Effects of genetic drift and gene flow on the selective maintenance of genetic variation.

Authors:  Bastiaan Star; Hamish G Spencer
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2013-03-02       Impact factor: 4.562

2.  The maintenance of single-locus polymorphism by maternal selection.

Authors:  Hamish G Spencer; Kai X Chiew
Journal:  G3 (Bethesda)       Date:  2015-03-19       Impact factor: 3.154

3.  The Selective Maintenance of Allelic Variation Under Generalized Dominance.

Authors:  Hamish G Spencer; Cuilodair Mitchell
Journal:  G3 (Bethesda)       Date:  2016-11-08       Impact factor: 3.154

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.