Literature DB >> 17483422

Single-locus polymorphism in a heterogeneous two-deme model.

Bastiaan Star1, Rick J Stoffels, Hamish G Spencer.   

Abstract

Environmental heterogeneity has long been considered a likely explanation for the high levels of genetic variation found in most natural populations: selection in a spatially heterogeneous environment can maintain more variation. While this theoretical result has been extensively studied in models with limited parameters (e.g., two alleles, fixed gene flow, and particular selection schemes), the effect of spatial heterogeneity is poorly understood for models with a wider range of parameters (e.g., multiple alleles, different levels of gene flow, and more general selection schemes). We have compared the volume of fitness space that maintains variation in a single-deme model to the volume in a two-deme model for multiple alleles, random selection schemes, and various levels of migration. Furthermore, equilibrium allele-frequency vectors were examined to see if particular patterns of variation are more prevalent than first expected. The two-deme model maintains variation for substantially larger volumes of fitness space with lower heterozygote fitness than the single-deme model. This result implies that selection schemes in the two-deme model can have a wider range of fitness patterns while still maintaining variation. The equilibrium allele-frequency patterns emerging from the two-deme model are more variable and strongly influenced by gene flow.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2007        PMID: 17483422      PMCID: PMC1931554          DOI: 10.1534/genetics.107.071639

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Genetics        ISSN: 0016-6731            Impact factor:   4.562


  20 in total

1.  Patterns of multiallelic polymorphism maintained by migration and selection.

Authors:  T Nagylaki; Y Lou
Journal:  Theor Popul Biol       Date:  2001-06       Impact factor: 1.570

2.  Adaptation to marginal habitats: contrasting influence of the dispersal rate on the fate of alleles with small and large effects.

Authors:  T J Kawecki
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2000-07-07       Impact factor: 5.349

3.  Heterozygote advantage fails to explain the high degree of polymorphism of the MHC.

Authors:  Rob J De Boer; José A M Borghans; Michiel van Boven; Can Keşmir; Franz J Weissing
Journal:  Immunogenetics       Date:  2004-01-13       Impact factor: 2.846

4.  Testing neutrality in subdivided populations.

Authors:  M Slatkin
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  1982-03       Impact factor: 4.562

5.  The maintenance of single-locus polymorphism. IV. Models with mutation from existing alleles.

Authors:  H G Spencer; R W Marks
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  1992-01       Impact factor: 4.562

6.  The sampling theory of selectively neutral alleles.

Authors:  W J Ewens
Journal:  Theor Popul Biol       Date:  1972-03       Impact factor: 1.570

7.  Moran's island migration model.

Authors:  E A Eyland
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  1971-11       Impact factor: 4.562

8.  Polymorphism in a varied environment: how robust are the models?

Authors:  J M Smith; R Hoekstra
Journal:  Genet Res       Date:  1980-02       Impact factor: 1.588

9.  Environmental heterogeneity and balancing selection in the acorn barnacle Semibalanus balanoides.

Authors:  P S Schmidt; M D Bertness; D M Rand
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2000-02-22       Impact factor: 5.349

10.  Genotype-environment interaction at quantitative trait loci affecting sensory bristle number in Drosophila melanogaster.

Authors:  M C Gurganus; J D Fry; S V Nuzhdin; E G Pasyukova; R F Lyman; T F Mackay
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  1998-08       Impact factor: 4.562

View more
  12 in total

1.  Evolution of fitnesses and allele frequencies in a population with spatially heterogeneous selection pressures.

Authors:  Bastiaan Star; Rick J Stoffels; Hamish G Spencer
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2007-10-18       Impact factor: 4.562

2.  Multilocus selection in subdivided populations II. Maintenance of polymorphism under weak or strong migration.

Authors:  Reinhard Bürger
Journal:  J Math Biol       Date:  2008-11-27       Impact factor: 2.259

3.  Models of frequency-dependent selection with mutation from parental alleles.

Authors:  Meredith V Trotter; Hamish G Spencer
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2013-07-12       Impact factor: 4.562

4.  A fundamental relationship between genotype frequencies and fitnesses.

Authors:  Joseph Lachance
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2008-09-09       Impact factor: 4.562

5.  The generation and maintenance of genetic variation by frequency-dependent selection: constructing polymorphisms under the pairwise interaction model.

Authors:  Meredith V Trotter; Hamish G Spencer
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2008-09-14       Impact factor: 4.562

6.  Evolution of fitnesses in structured populations with correlated environments.

Authors:  Bastiaan Star; Meredith V Trotter; Hamish G Spencer
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2008-06-18       Impact factor: 4.562

7.  Establishment of Locally Adapted Mutations Under Divergent Selection.

Authors:  Matteo Tomasini; Stephan Peischl
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2018-05-17       Impact factor: 4.562

8.  Effects of genetic drift and gene flow on the selective maintenance of genetic variation.

Authors:  Bastiaan Star; Hamish G Spencer
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2013-03-02       Impact factor: 4.562

Review 9.  Pleiotropy, constraint, and modularity in the evolution of life histories: insights from genomic analyses.

Authors:  Kimberly A Hughes; Jeff Leips
Journal:  Ann N Y Acad Sci       Date:  2016-12-09       Impact factor: 5.691

10.  The maintenance of single-locus polymorphism by maternal selection.

Authors:  Hamish G Spencer; Kai X Chiew
Journal:  G3 (Bethesda)       Date:  2015-03-19       Impact factor: 3.154

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.