Literature DB >> 18560880

Using three objective criteria to examine pedometer guidelines for free-living individuals.

Duncan James Macfarlane1, Dionise Chan, K L Chan, Edmond Y K Ho, Cherry C Y Lee.   

Abstract

The purpose was to examine in free-living individuals from a high-density city (1) the objectively determined physical activity levels across quartiles derived from pedometer step counts, (2) the pedometer steps day(-1) required to meet health-enhancing guidelines of accruing 30 min day(-1) of moderate physical activity and (3) the agreement between three objective criteria for the pedometer guidelines. Over 7 days 49 Hong Kong Chinese aged 15-55 years (n = 30 males) wore a polar heart rate monitor (HRM), an MTI and Tritrac accelerometer, plus a Yamax pedometer for >or=600 min day(-1). Participants averaged 9,839 +/- 3,088 steps day(-1), whilst accumulating 44.5 +/- 22.6, 43.1 +/- 21.7, and 24.7 +/- 19.3 min day(-1) of moderate physical activity by the Tritrac, MTI and HRM, respectively. Significant differences between quartiles of pedometer-determined activity were predominantly seen in the accelerometry data, especially during moderate and moderate-to-vigorous intensity activity (effect sizes >1.5 between upper and lower quartiles), but not seen in the HRM data. Using both criterion accelerometer datasets, a threshold of 8,000 steps day(-1) accurately categorized approximately 90% of those achieving, and approximately 80% of those not achieving, 30 min day(-1) of appropriate activity. They also produced a screening sensitivity of approximately 95% and a specificity of approximately 70%, which were considerably higher than those from the HRM data. Overall, the agreement between the three criterion measures suggests 8,000 steps day(-1) might be a valid screening tool as a proxy for classifying those meeting public health physical activity recommendations of 30 min day(-1) of moderate activity.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2008        PMID: 18560880     DOI: 10.1007/s00421-008-0789-4

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur J Appl Physiol        ISSN: 1439-6319            Impact factor:   3.078


  29 in total

Review 1.  Validity and reliability issues in objective monitoring of physical activity.

Authors:  D R Bassett
Journal:  Res Q Exerc Sport       Date:  2000-06       Impact factor: 2.500

2.  American Cancer Society guidelines on nutrition and physical activity for cancer prevention: Reducing the risk of cancer with healthy food choices and physical activity.

Authors:  Tim Byers; Marion Nestle; Anne McTiernan; Colleen Doyle; Alexis Currie-Williams; Ted Gansler; Michael Thun
Journal:  CA Cancer J Clin       Date:  2002 Mar-Apr       Impact factor: 508.702

Review 3.  Is physical activity or physical fitness more important in defining health benefits?

Authors:  S N Blair; Y Cheng; J S Holder
Journal:  Med Sci Sports Exerc       Date:  2001-06       Impact factor: 5.411

4.  Descriptive epidemiology of pedometer-determined physical activity.

Authors:  Catrine Tudor-Locke; Sandra A Ham; Caroline A Macera; Barbara E Ainsworth; Karen A Kirtland; Jared P Reis; C Dexter Kimsey
Journal:  Med Sci Sports Exerc       Date:  2004-09       Impact factor: 5.411

5.  Physical activity and public health: updated recommendation for adults from the American College of Sports Medicine and the American Heart Association.

Authors:  William L Haskell; I-Min Lee; Russell R Pate; Kenneth E Powell; Steven N Blair; Barry A Franklin; Caroline A Macera; Gregory W Heath; Paul D Thompson; Adrian Bauman
Journal:  Circulation       Date:  2007-08-01       Impact factor: 29.690

Review 6.  Evidence based physical activity for school-age youth.

Authors:  William B Strong; Robert M Malina; Cameron J R Blimkie; Stephen R Daniels; Rodney K Dishman; Bernard Gutin; Albert C Hergenroeder; Aviva Must; Patricia A Nixon; James M Pivarnik; Thomas Rowland; Stewart Trost; François Trudeau
Journal:  J Pediatr       Date:  2005-06       Impact factor: 4.406

7.  Reliability and validity of the Chinese version of IPAQ (short, last 7 days).

Authors:  Duncan J Macfarlane; Cherry C Y Lee; Edmond Y K Ho; K L Chan; Dionise T S Chan
Journal:  J Sci Med Sport       Date:  2006-06-30       Impact factor: 4.319

8.  Lifestyle activity. Current recommendations.

Authors:  W T Phillips; L A Pruitt; A C King
Journal:  Sports Med       Date:  1996-07       Impact factor: 11.136

9.  Comparison of pedometer and accelerometer measures of free-living physical activity.

Authors:  Catrine Tudor-Locke; Barbara E Ainsworth; Raymond W Thompson; Charles E Matthews
Journal:  Med Sci Sports Exerc       Date:  2002-12       Impact factor: 5.411

10.  Increasing daily walking lowers blood pressure in postmenopausal women.

Authors:  K L Moreau; R Degarmo; J Langley; C McMahon; E T Howley; D R Bassett; D L Thompson
Journal:  Med Sci Sports Exerc       Date:  2001-11       Impact factor: 5.411

View more
  5 in total

1.  Objective quantification of physical activity in bariatric surgery candidates and normal-weight controls.

Authors:  Dale S Bond; John M Jakicic; Sivamainthan Vithiananthan; J Graham Thomas; Tricia M Leahey; Harry C Sax; Dieter Pohl; G D Roye; Beth A Ryder; Rena R Wing
Journal:  Surg Obes Relat Dis       Date:  2009-09-10       Impact factor: 4.734

2.  Steps, moderate-to-vigorous physical activity, and cardiometabolic profiles.

Authors:  Samantha Hajna; Nancy A Ross; Kaberi Dasgupta
Journal:  Prev Med       Date:  2017-11-07       Impact factor: 4.018

3.  Agreement between pedometer and accelerometer in measuring physical activity in overweight and obese pregnant women.

Authors:  Tarja I Kinnunen; Peter W G Tennant; Catherine McParlin; Lucilla Poston; Stephen C Robson; Ruth Bell
Journal:  BMC Public Health       Date:  2011-06-27       Impact factor: 3.295

Review 4.  How many steps/day are enough? For adults.

Authors:  Catrine Tudor-Locke; Cora L Craig; Wendy J Brown; Stacy A Clemes; Katrien De Cocker; Billie Giles-Corti; Yoshiro Hatano; Shigeru Inoue; Sandra M Matsudo; Nanette Mutrie; Jean-Michel Oppert; David A Rowe; Michael D Schmidt; Grant M Schofield; John C Spence; Pedro J Teixeira; Mark A Tully; Steven N Blair
Journal:  Int J Behav Nutr Phys Act       Date:  2011-07-28       Impact factor: 6.457

5.  Accuracy of the energy expenditure during uphill exercise measured by the Waist-worn ActiGraph.

Authors:  Chun-Hao Chang; Kuo-Chuan Lin; Chin-Shan Ho; Chi-Chang Huang
Journal:  J Exerc Sci Fit       Date:  2019-01-23       Impact factor: 3.103

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.