| Literature DB >> 18560528 |
Karin Schläwicke Engström1, Ulf Strömberg, Thomas Lundh, Ingegerd Johansson, Bengt Vessby, Göran Hallmans, Staffan Skerfving, Karin Broberg.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Exposure to toxic methylmercury (MeHg) through fish consumption is a large problem worldwide, and it has led to governmental recommendations of reduced fish consumption and blacklisting of mercury-contaminated fish. The elimination kinetics of MeHg varies greatly among individuals. Knowledge about the reasons for such variation is of importance for improving the risk assessment for MeHg. One possible explanation is hereditary differences in MeHg metabolism. MeHg is eliminated from the body as a glutathione (GSH) conjugate.Entities:
Keywords: GCLC; GCLM; GSTP1; metabolism; methylmercury; polymorphism
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2008 PMID: 18560528 PMCID: PMC2430228 DOI: 10.1289/ehp.10804
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Environ Health Perspect ISSN: 0091-6765 Impact factor: 9.031
Summary Ery-Hg and exposure data for the study population (n = 292).
| Characteristic | Mean | Median | Range |
|---|---|---|---|
| Ery-Hg (μg/L) | 5.5 | 4.2 | < LOD–40 |
| P-PUFA (%) | 6.9 | 6.6 | 3.6–16 |
| Fish consumption (no. of meals per day) | |||
| Total | 0.52 | 0.44 | 0.36–2.0 |
| Fat fish | 0.22 | 0.14 | 0–1.0 |
| Lean fish | 0.30 | 0.36 | 0.040–1.0 |
LOD, limit of detection.
Figure 1Relationship between P-PUFA and Ery-Hg.
Figure 2Relationship between P-PUFA (ln transformed) and Ery-Hg (ln transformed).
Figure 3Relationship between P-PUFA (double ln transformed) and Ery-Hg (ln transformed).
Genotype frequencies for GCLC-129, GCLM-588, GSTP1-105, and GSTP1-114.
| Gene | Polymorphism | Genotype | Frequency (%) |
|---|---|---|---|
| −129C/T | CC | 88 | |
| rs17883901 | CT | 11 | |
| TT | 0.3 | ||
| −588C/T | CC | 76 | |
| rs41303970 | CT | 20 | |
| TT | 4 | ||
| Ile105Val | Ile/Ile | 45 | |
| rs1695 | Ile/Val | 47 | |
| Val/Val | 9 | ||
| Ala114Val | Ala/Ala | 80 | |
| rs1138272 | Ala/Val | 19 | |
| Val/Val | 1 |
The rs (refSNP) numbers are from the SNP Database (NCBI 2006a).
Ery-Hg (geometric mean) for different genotypes among the different exposure groups.
| Low (3.6–5.8% P-PUFA)
| Intermediate (5.9–7.5% P-PUFA)
| High (7.6–16% P-PUFA)
| ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Genotype | Ery-Hg | No. | Ery-Hg | No. | Ery-Hg | No. |
| CC | 2.9 | 83 | 3.9 | 85 | 5.9 | 90 |
| CT + TT | 3.3 | 14 | 4.1 | 13 | 7.9 | 7 |
| CC | 3.2 | 74 | 4.0 | 72 | 6.0 | 75 |
| CT | 2.2 | 20 | 3.4 | 19 | 5.7 | 18 |
| TT | 4.6 | 3 | 5.8 | 5 | 9.0 | 4 |
| IleIle | 3.1 | 45 | 4.1 | 41 | 7.0 | 44 |
| IleVal | 2.7 | 43 | 3.6 | 47 | 5.6 | 46 |
| ValVal | 3.7 | 9 | 5.2 | 9 | 4.4 | 7 |
| AlaAla | 2.9 | 80 | 4.0 | 77 | 6.5 | 75 |
| AlaVal, ValVal | 3.1 | 16 | 3.9 | 21 | 4.7 | 22 |
| No variant alleles | 3.0 | 44 | 4.1 | 40 | 7.0 | 44 |
| One variant allele | 2.7 | 33 | 3.6 | 33 | 6.1 | 28 |
| Two variant alleles | 3.2 | 19 | 4.2 | 24 | 4.6 | 25 |
GCLC CT and TT are pooled because of the low number of individuals with the TT genotype (n = 1).
GSTP1 AlaVal and ValVal are pooled because of the low number of individuals with the ValVal genotype (n = 4).
p < 0.05 within the exposure group.
Multivariate regression model.a
| Polymorphism | Effect modification β5 | |
|---|---|---|
| 0.67 | 0.40 | |
| 0.25 | 0.90 | |
| 1.8 | 0.077 | |
| 1.3 | 0.061 | |
| 0 and 1 variant allele (222) vs. 2 variant alleles (68) | 1.5 | 0.038 |
| 0 and 1 variant allele (249) vs. 2 variant alleles (42) | 1.3 | 0.095 |
| 0 and 1 variant allele (262) vs. 2 variant alleles (27) | 1.8 | 0.091 |
| 0 and 1 variant allele (270) vs. 2 variant alleles (20) | −1.0 | 0.41 |
| 0 and 1 variant allele (226) vs. 2 variant alleles (64) | 0.33 | 0.65 |
| 0 and 1 variant allele (262) vs. 2 variant alleles (27) | 0.66 | 0.50 |
Genotypes are dichotomized, and referents are denoted last. Ery-Hg is ln transformed, and P-PUFA is double ln transformed. Only the results of the effect modification (genotype*P-PUFA) on Ery-Hg levels are presented.
The term β5 denotes the difference between the inclinations of the regression slopes for Ery-Hg on P-PUFA.
Figure 4Ery-Hg as a function of P-PUFA for different GCLM C588T genotypes. The regression lines do not reflect adjustments for age and year of sampling, as does the multivariate regression model presented in the text.
Figure 5Ery-Hg as a function of P-PUFA for different numbers of variant alleles for GSTP1 Ile105Val and GSTP1 Ala114Val. The regression lines are aimed at illustrating the general direction of interaction; thus, they were not derived from the multivariate regression model presented in Table 4.