DESIGN: Prospective cohort study. OBJECTIVES: To determine the relationship between quadriceps angle (Q-angle) and risk of lower extremity injury among adolescent cross-country runners. BACKGROUND: No consensus exists on the role of the Q-angle as a risk factor for lower-extremity overuse injury, especially the effect of large Q-angle or right-left Q-angle difference. METHODS AND MEASURES: The Q-angles of 393 high school cross-country runners, 13 to 19 years of age, were goniometrically measured in a static, standing position with quadriceps relaxed. The runners were followed during a cross-country season to assess lower extremity injuries resulting from running in practices or competitions. RESULTS: Runners with a Q-angle >20 degrees were at 1.7 times greater risk of injury (relative risk [RR], 1.7; 95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.2, 2.4) compared with runners whose Q-angle was 10 degrees to <15 degrees . The RR estimates were similar among girls and boys. Runners with >4 degrees absolute right-left Q-angle difference were at 1.8 times greater risk (RR, 1.8; 95% CI: 1.4, 2.5) compared to runners with a smaller difference. Runners with a Q-angle >20 degrees were more likely to injure their knee, while runners with >4 degrees Q-angle difference were more likely to injure their shin. Runners with a Q-angle >20 degrees had greater time lost due to injury. CONCLUSIONS: High school cross-country runners with large or asymmetric Q-angles may be at greater risk for running injury. Our study suggests that Q-angle measurement be included in preseason screening exams.
DESIGN: Prospective cohort study. OBJECTIVES: To determine the relationship between quadriceps angle (Q-angle) and risk of lower extremity injury among adolescent cross-country runners. BACKGROUND: No consensus exists on the role of the Q-angle as a risk factor for lower-extremity overuse injury, especially the effect of large Q-angle or right-left Q-angle difference. METHODS AND MEASURES: The Q-angles of 393 high school cross-country runners, 13 to 19 years of age, were goniometrically measured in a static, standing position with quadriceps relaxed. The runners were followed during a cross-country season to assess lower extremity injuries resulting from running in practices or competitions. RESULTS: Runners with a Q-angle >20 degrees were at 1.7 times greater risk of injury (relative risk [RR], 1.7; 95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.2, 2.4) compared with runners whose Q-angle was 10 degrees to <15 degrees . The RR estimates were similar among girls and boys. Runners with >4 degrees absolute right-left Q-angle difference were at 1.8 times greater risk (RR, 1.8; 95% CI: 1.4, 2.5) compared to runners with a smaller difference. Runners with a Q-angle >20 degrees were more likely to injure their knee, while runners with >4 degrees Q-angle difference were more likely to injure their shin. Runners with a Q-angle >20 degrees had greater time lost due to injury. CONCLUSIONS: High school cross-country runners with large or asymmetric Q-angles may be at greater risk for running injury. Our study suggests that Q-angle measurement be included in preseason screening exams.
Authors: Maria Ortqvist; Eva B Moström; Ewa M Roos; Pia Lundell; Per-Mats Janarv; Suzanne Werner; Eva W Broström Journal: Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc Date: 2011-05-17 Impact factor: 4.342
Authors: Gregory D Myer; Kevin R Ford; Kim D Barber Foss; Arlene Goodman; Adrick Ceasar; Mitchell J Rauh; Jon G Divine; Timothy E Hewett Journal: Clin Biomech (Bristol, Avon) Date: 2010-05-14 Impact factor: 2.063
Authors: Melissa C Kay; Johna K Register-Mihalik; Aaron D Gray; Aristarque Djoko; Thomas P Dompier; Zachary Y Kerr Journal: J Athl Train Date: 2017-01-24 Impact factor: 2.860
Authors: Bruno Tirotti Saragiotto; Tiê Parma Yamato; Luiz Carlos Hespanhol Junior; Michael J Rainbow; Irene S Davis; Alexandre Dias Lopes Journal: Sports Med Date: 2014-08 Impact factor: 11.136