Literature DB >> 18560139

The interrater and intrarater reliability of the Modified Ashworth Scale in the assessment of muscle spasticity: limb and muscle group effect.

Noureddin Nakhostin Ansari1, Soofia Naghdi, Tahereh Khosravian Arab, Shohreh Jalaie.   

Abstract

The Modified Ashworth Scale (MAS) is a clinical scale used to assess muscle spasticity. While the evidence indicates that the reliability of the MAS is better in the upper limb and in certain distal muscle groups, no investigation has compared the effect of limbs and muscle groups on the MAS reliability. This study aimed to evaluate the effect of limb and muscle group on the reliability of the MAS in patients with spastic hemiplegia. Thirty subjects with upper and lower limb muscle spasticity were recruited for this trial. Two female experienced physiotherapists participated in this examination of reliability, and rated each patient in a randomized order in a single session. For the intrarater reliability, the second rater repeated the test 1 week later. Shoulder adductor, elbow flexor, wrist flexor, hip adductor, knee extensor, and ankle plantar flexor were tested on the hemiplegic side. Results demonstrated moderate inter (kappa=0.514, SE=0.046, p < 0.001) and intrarater (kappa=0.590, SE=0.051, p<0.001) reliability. For the inter and intrarater reliability, the agreement obtained for the upper and lower limb was similar. In the upper limb, the agreement between raters on the distal wrist flexor was significantly higher than the agreement on the proximal shoulder adductor. In the lower limb, there was a similar agreement between raters on the distal ankle plantar flexor and proximal hip adductor. For within rater, the agreement on the proximal and distal muscles of both limbs was not statistically significant. The Modified Ashworth Scale had moderate reliability. The limbs had no effect on the reliability. The agreement on distal wrist flexor in the upper limb was significantly higher between rater than in the proximal shoulder adductor. The agreement obtained with the MAS was not good, which questions the validity of the measurements.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2008        PMID: 18560139

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  NeuroRehabilitation        ISSN: 1053-8135            Impact factor:   2.138


  39 in total

1.  Examining impairment of adaptive compensation for stabilizing motor repetitions in stroke survivors.

Authors:  Yushin Kim; Kyung Koh; BumChul Yoon; Woo-Sub Kim; Joon-Ho Shin; Hyung-Soon Park; Jae Kun Shim
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2017-09-06       Impact factor: 1.972

2.  Evaluation of spasticity after stroke by using ultrasound to measure the muscle architecture parameters: a clinical study.

Authors:  Yuan-Bin Yang; Jing Zhang; Zhen-Peng Leng; Xin Chen; Wei-Qun Song
Journal:  Int J Clin Exp Med       Date:  2014-09-15

3.  Neurological manifestations in individuals with HTLV-1-associated myelopathy/tropical spastic paraparesis in the Amazon.

Authors:  G A S Dias; G T Yoshikawa; R V L Koyama; S Fujihara; L C S Martins; R Medeiros; J A S Quaresma; H T Fuzii
Journal:  Spinal Cord       Date:  2015-07-14       Impact factor: 2.772

4.  The home stroke rehabilitation and monitoring system trial: a randomized controlled trial.

Authors:  Susan M Linder; Anson B Rosenfeldt; Aimee Reiss; Sharon Buchanan; Komal Sahu; Curtis R Bay; Steven L Wolf; Jay L Alberts
Journal:  Int J Stroke       Date:  2013-01       Impact factor: 5.266

5.  Assessment of forearm muscle spasticity with sonoelastography in patients with stroke.

Authors:  Evren Yaşar; Emre Adigüzel; Serdar Kesikburun; Itır Yenihayat; Bilge Yilmaz; Rıdvan Alaca; Arif K Tan
Journal:  Br J Radiol       Date:  2016-10-25       Impact factor: 3.039

6.  Incorporating robotic-assisted telerehabilitation in a home program to improve arm function following stroke.

Authors:  Susan M Linder; Aimee Reiss; Sharon Buchanan; Komal Sahu; Anson B Rosenfeldt; Cindy Clark; Steven L Wolf; Jay L Alberts
Journal:  J Neurol Phys Ther       Date:  2013-09       Impact factor: 3.649

7.  Comparison of transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulation (TENS) and functional electrical stimulation (FES) for spasticity in spinal cord injury - A pilot randomized cross-over trial.

Authors:  Anjali Sivaramakrishnan; John M Solomon; Natarajan Manikandan
Journal:  J Spinal Cord Med       Date:  2017-10-25       Impact factor: 1.985

8.  Effect of baseline spastic hemiparesis on recovery of upper-limb function following botulinum toxin type A injections and postinjection therapy.

Authors:  Chia-Lin Chang; Michael C Munin; Elizabeth R Skidmore; Christian Niyonkuru; Lynne M Huber; Douglas J Weber
Journal:  Arch Phys Med Rehabil       Date:  2009-09       Impact factor: 3.966

9.  Deficits in motor abilities for multi-finger force control in hemiparetic stroke survivors.

Authors:  Yushin Kim; Woo-Sub Kim; Kyung Koh; BumChul Yoon; Diane L Damiano; Jae Kun Shim
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2016-04-12       Impact factor: 1.972

Review 10.  Contribution of Single-Fiber Evaluation on Monitoring Outcomes Following Injection of Botulinum Toxin-A: A Narrative Review of the Literature.

Authors:  Hélène Moron; Corine Gagnard-Landra; David Guiraud; Arnaud Dupeyron
Journal:  Toxins (Basel)       Date:  2021-05-17       Impact factor: 4.546

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.