PURPOSE: Hyperactivation of the phosphatidylinositol 3-kinase/Akt signaling through disruption of PTEN function is common in glioblastoma multiforme, and these genetic changes are predicted to enhance sensitivity to mammalian target of rapamycin (mTOR) inhibitors such as RAD001 (everolimus). EXPERIMENTAL DESIGN: To test whether PTEN loss could be used as a predictive marker for mTOR inhibitor sensitivity, the response of 17 serially transplantable glioblastoma multiforme xenografts was evaluated in an orthotopic therapy evaluation model. Of these 17 xenograft lines, 7 have either genomic deletion or mutation of PTEN. RESULTS: Consistent with activation of Akt signaling, there was a good correlation between loss of PTEN function and elevated levels of Akt phosphorylation. However, of the 7 lines with disrupted PTEN function, only 1 tumor line (GBM10) was significantly sensitive to RAD001 therapy (25% prolongation in median survival), whereas 1 of 10 xenograft lines with wild-type PTEN was significantly sensitive to RAD001 (GS22; 34% prolongation in survival). Relative to placebo, 5 days of RAD001 treatment was associated with a marked 66% reduction in the MIB1 proliferation index in the sensitive GBM10 line (deleted PTEN) compared with a 25% and 7% reduction in MIB1 labeling index in the insensitive GBM14 (mutant PTEN) and GBM15 (wild-type PTEN) lines, respectively. Consistent with a cytostatic antitumor effect, bioluminescent imaging of luciferase-transduced intracranial GBM10 xenografts showed slowed tumor growth without significant tumor regression during RAD001 therapy. CONCLUSION: These data suggest that loss of PTEN function is insufficient to adequately predict responsiveness to mTOR inhibitors in glioblastoma multiforme.
PURPOSE: Hyperactivation of the phosphatidylinositol 3-kinase/Akt signaling through disruption of PTEN function is common in glioblastoma multiforme, and these genetic changes are predicted to enhance sensitivity to mammalian target of rapamycin (mTOR) inhibitors such as RAD001 (everolimus). EXPERIMENTAL DESIGN: To test whether PTEN loss could be used as a predictive marker for mTOR inhibitor sensitivity, the response of 17 serially transplantable glioblastoma multiforme xenografts was evaluated in an orthotopic therapy evaluation model. Of these 17 xenograft lines, 7 have either genomic deletion or mutation of PTEN. RESULTS: Consistent with activation of Akt signaling, there was a good correlation between loss of PTEN function and elevated levels of Akt phosphorylation. However, of the 7 lines with disrupted PTEN function, only 1 tumor line (GBM10) was significantly sensitive to RAD001 therapy (25% prolongation in median survival), whereas 1 of 10 xenograft lines with wild-type PTEN was significantly sensitive to RAD001 (GS22; 34% prolongation in survival). Relative to placebo, 5 days of RAD001 treatment was associated with a marked 66% reduction in the MIB1 proliferation index in the sensitive GBM10 line (deleted PTEN) compared with a 25% and 7% reduction in MIB1 labeling index in the insensitive GBM14 (mutant PTEN) and GBM15 (wild-type PTEN) lines, respectively. Consistent with a cytostatic antitumor effect, bioluminescent imaging of luciferase-transduced intracranial GBM10 xenografts showed slowed tumor growth without significant tumor regression during RAD001 therapy. CONCLUSION: These data suggest that loss of PTEN function is insufficient to adequately predict responsiveness to mTOR inhibitors in glioblastoma multiforme.
Authors: B Geoerger; K Kerr; C B Tang; K M Fung; B Powell; L N Sutton; P C Phillips; A J Janss Journal: Cancer Res Date: 2001-02-15 Impact factor: 12.701
Authors: K Podsypanina; R T Lee; C Politis; I Hennessy; A Crane; J Puc; M Neshat; H Wang; L Yang; J Gibbons; P Frost; V Dreisbach; J Blenis; Z Gaciong; P Fisher; C Sawyers; L Hedrick-Ellenson; R Parsons Journal: Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A Date: 2001-08-14 Impact factor: 11.205
Authors: M S Neshat; I K Mellinghoff; C Tran; B Stiles; G Thomas; R Petersen; P Frost; J J Gibbons; H Wu; C L Sawyers Journal: Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A Date: 2001-08-14 Impact factor: 11.205
Authors: Jann N Sarkaria; Lin Yang; Patrick T Grogan; Gaspar J Kitange; Brett L Carlson; Mark A Schroeder; Evanthia Galanis; Caterina Giannini; Wenting Wu; Eduard B Dinca; C David James Journal: Mol Cancer Ther Date: 2007-03 Impact factor: 6.261
Authors: Gary Hudes; Michael Carducci; Piotr Tomczak; Janice Dutcher; Robert Figlin; Anil Kapoor; Elzbieta Staroslawska; Jeffrey Sosman; David McDermott; István Bodrogi; Zoran Kovacevic; Vladimir Lesovoy; Ingo G H Schmidt-Wolf; Olga Barbarash; Erhan Gokmen; Timothy O'Toole; Stephanie Lustgarten; Laurence Moore; Robert J Motzer Journal: N Engl J Med Date: 2007-05-31 Impact factor: 91.245
Authors: Warren P Mason; Mary Macneil; Petr Kavan; Jacob Easaw; David Macdonald; Brian Thiessen; Shweta Urva; Zarnie Lwin; Lynn McIntosh; Elizabeth Eisenhauer Journal: Invest New Drugs Date: 2011-12-09 Impact factor: 3.850
Authors: Victoria L Bae-Jump; Chunxiao Zhou; John F Boggess; Young E Whang; Lisa Barroilhet; Paola A Gehrig Journal: Gynecol Oncol Date: 2010-09-21 Impact factor: 5.482
Authors: David A Reardon; Annick Desjardins; James J Vredenburgh; Sridharan Gururangan; Allan H Friedman; James E Herndon; Jennifer Marcello; Julie A Norfleet; Roger E McLendon; John H Sampson; Henry S Friedman Journal: J Neurooncol Date: 2009-06-28 Impact factor: 4.130
Authors: Myriam M Chaumeil; Tomoko Ozawa; IlWoo Park; Kristen Scott; C David James; Sarah J Nelson; Sabrina M Ronen Journal: Neuroimage Date: 2011-07-23 Impact factor: 6.556
Authors: Brett L Carlson; Patrick T Grogan; Ann C Mladek; Mark A Schroeder; Gaspar J Kitange; Paul A Decker; Caterina Giannini; Wenting Wu; Karla A Ballman; C David James; Jann N Sarkaria Journal: Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys Date: 2009-09-01 Impact factor: 7.038