Literature DB >> 18559176

Visitation by wild and managed bees (Hymenoptera: Apoidea) to eastern U.S. native plants for use in conservation programs.

Julianna K Tuell1, Anna K Fiedler, Douglas Landis, Rufus Isaacs.   

Abstract

Addition of floral resources to agricultural field margins has been shown to increase abundance of beneficial insects in crop fields, but most plants recommended for this use are non-native annuals. Native perennial plants with different bloom periods can provide floral resources for bees throughout the growing season for use in pollinator conservation projects. To identify the most suitable plants for this use, we examined the relative attractiveness to wild and managed bees of 43 eastern U.S. native perennial plants, grown in a common garden setting. Floral characteristics were evaluated for their ability to predict bee abundance and taxa richness. Of the wild bees collected, the most common species (62%) was Bombus impatiens Cresson. Five other wild bee species were present between 3 and 6% of the total: Lasioglossum admirandum (Sandhouse), Hylaeus affinis (Smith), Agapostemon virescens (F.), Halictus ligatus Say, and Ceratina calcarata/dupla Robertson/Say. The remaining wild bee species were present at <2% of the total. Abundance of honey bees (Apis mellifera L.) was nearly identical to that of B. impatiens. All plant species were visited at least once by wild bees; 9 were highly attractive, and 20 were moderately attractive. Honey bees visited 24 of the 43 plant species at least once. Floral area was the only measured factor accounting for variation in abundance and richness of wild bees but did not explain variation in honey bee abundance. Results of this study can be used to guide selection of flowering plants to provide season-long forage for conservation of wild bees.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2008        PMID: 18559176     DOI: 10.1603/0046-225x(2008)37[707:vbwamb]2.0.co;2

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Environ Entomol        ISSN: 0046-225X            Impact factor:   2.377


  18 in total

1.  Landscape context shifts the balance of costs and benefits from wildflower borders on multiple ecosystem services.

Authors:  Heather Grab; Katja Poveda; Bryan Danforth; Greg Loeb
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2018-08-01       Impact factor: 5.349

2.  Landscape simplification shapes pathogen prevalence in plant-pollinator networks.

Authors:  Laura L Figueroa; Heather Grab; Wee Hao Ng; Christopher R Myers; Peter Graystock; Quinn S McFrederick; Scott H McArt
Journal:  Ecol Lett       Date:  2020-04-28       Impact factor: 9.492

3.  Bee genera, diversity and abundance in genetically modified canola fields.

Authors:  Colton O'Brien; H S Arathi
Journal:  GM Crops Food       Date:  2018-04-02       Impact factor: 3.074

4.  Land-use change reduces habitat suitability for supporting managed honey bee colonies in the Northern Great Plains.

Authors:  Clint R V Otto; Cali L Roth; Benjamin L Carlson; Matthew D Smart
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2016-08-29       Impact factor: 11.205

5.  Rising atmospheric CO2 is reducing the protein concentration of a floral pollen source essential for North American bees.

Authors:  Lewis H Ziska; Jeffery S Pettis; Joan Edwards; Jillian E Hancock; Martha B Tomecek; Andrew Clark; Jeffrey S Dukes; Irakli Loladze; H Wayne Polley
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2016-04-13       Impact factor: 5.349

6.  Do Viruses From Managed Honey Bees (Hymenoptera: Apidae) Endanger Wild Bees in Native Prairies?

Authors:  Zoe A Pritchard; Harmen P Hendriksma; Ashley L St Clair; David S Stein; Adam G Dolezal; Matthew E O'Neal; Amy L Toth
Journal:  Environ Entomol       Date:  2021-04-23       Impact factor: 2.377

7.  Use of video surveillance to measure the influences of habitat management and landscape composition on pollinator visitation and pollen deposition in pumpkin (Cucurbita pepo) agroecosystems.

Authors:  Benjamin W Phillips; Mary M Gardiner
Journal:  PeerJ       Date:  2015-11-05       Impact factor: 2.984

8.  Taxonomic Characterization of Honey Bee (Apis mellifera) Pollen Foraging Based on Non-Overlapping Paired-End Sequencing of Nuclear Ribosomal Loci.

Authors:  R Scott Cornman; Clint R V Otto; Deborah Iwanowicz; Jeffery S Pettis
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2015-12-23       Impact factor: 3.240

9.  Supporting crop pollinators with floral resources: network-based phenological matching.

Authors:  Laura Russo; Nelson Debarros; Suann Yang; Katriona Shea; David Mortensen
Journal:  Ecol Evol       Date:  2013-08-02       Impact factor: 2.912

10.  DNA barcoding to identify leaf preference of leafcutting bees.

Authors:  J Scott MacIvor
Journal:  R Soc Open Sci       Date:  2016-03-02       Impact factor: 2.963

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.