Literature DB >> 18558274

Changes in pressure pain thresholds over C5-C6 zygapophyseal joint after a cervicothoracic junction manipulation in healthy subjects.

César Fernández-de-Las-Peñas1, Cristina Alonso-Blanco, Joshua A Cleland, Cleofás Rodríguez-Blanco, Francisco Alburquerque-Sendín.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: This study examines if C7-T1 manipulation results in changes in pressure pain thresholds (PPT) over bilateral C5-C6 zygapophyseal joints in asymptomatic subjects.
METHODS: Thirty subjects, 13 men and 17 women, without a current history of neck, shoulder, or upper extremity pain participated. Participants were randomly divided into 3 groups: experimental dominant group, subjects who received the manipulative thrust directed at the right side of the C7-T1 joint; experimental nondominant group, those who received the thrust on the left side of the C7-T1 joint; and a placebo group, those who received a sham-manual procedure. The outcome measure was the PPT on both right and left C5-C5 zygapophyseal joints, which was assessed at preintervention and 5 minutes postintervention by an assessor blinded to the treatment allocation of the subject. A 3-way repeated measures analysis of covariance was used to evaluate changes in PPT.
RESULTS: The analysis of covariance revealed time x group (F = 32.3; P < .001), time x side (F = 4.9; P < .05), time x sex (F = 7.93; P < .01), and time x group x sex (F = 7.606; P < .001) interactions. Post hoc analyses found that (a) both experimental groups showed greater improvements in PPT than the placebo group (P < .05), without significant differences between them (P > .6); (b) the right side had greater increases in PPT in both experimental groups (P < .05), but not within the placebo group (P > .8); (c) men experienced greater increases in PPT levels than women, particularly in the experimental nondominant group (P < .01). Within-group effect sizes were large for both experimental groups (d > 1), but small for the placebo condition (d < 0.2).
CONCLUSIONS: These results suggest that a C7-T1 manipulation induced changes in PPT in both right and left C5-C6 zygapophyseal joints in healthy subjects.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2008        PMID: 18558274     DOI: 10.1016/j.jmpt.2008.04.006

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Manipulative Physiol Ther        ISSN: 0161-4754            Impact factor:   1.437


  26 in total

1.  The immediate effects of thoracic transverse mobilization in patients with the primary complaint of mechanical neck pain: a pilot study.

Authors:  CIndy McGregor; Robert Boyles; Laura Murahashi; Tanya Sena; Robert Yarnall
Journal:  J Man Manip Ther       Date:  2014-11

Review 2.  Changes in pain sensitivity following spinal manipulation: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Rogelio A Coronado; Charles W Gay; Joel E Bialosky; Giselle D Carnaby; Mark D Bishop; Steven Z George
Journal:  J Electromyogr Kinesiol       Date:  2012-01-30       Impact factor: 2.368

3.  Placebo response to manual therapy: something out of nothing?

Authors:  Joel E Bialosky; Mark D Bishop; Steven Z George; Michael E Robinson
Journal:  J Man Manip Ther       Date:  2011-02

4.  The relationship of the audible pop to hypoalgesia associated with high-velocity, low-amplitude thrust manipulation: a secondary analysis of an experimental study in pain-free participants.

Authors:  Joel E Bialosky; Mark D Bishop; Michael E Robinson; Steven Z George
Journal:  J Manipulative Physiol Ther       Date:  2010-02       Impact factor: 1.437

5.  Effect of spinal manipulative therapy on mechanical pain sensitivity in patients with chronic nonspecific low back pain: a pilot randomized, controlled trial.

Authors:  Bryan M Bond; Chris D Kinslow; Adam W Yoder; Wen Liu
Journal:  J Man Manip Ther       Date:  2019-03-05

6.  A randomized sham-controlled trial of a neurodynamic technique in the treatment of carpal tunnel syndrome.

Authors:  Joel E Bialosky; Mark D Bishop; Don D Price; Michael E Robinson; Kevin R Vincent; Steven Z George
Journal:  J Orthop Sports Phys Ther       Date:  2009-10       Impact factor: 4.751

7.  The effectiveness of thoracic spine manipulation for the management of musculoskeletal conditions: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized clinical trials.

Authors:  Ronald F Walser; Brent B Meserve; Thomas R Boucher
Journal:  J Man Manip Ther       Date:  2009

8.  Spinal manipulation does not affect pressure pain thresholds in the absence of neuromodulators: a randomized controlled trial.

Authors:  Max K Jordon; Paul F Beattie; Sarah D'Urso; Sarah Scriven
Journal:  J Man Manip Ther       Date:  2016-09-12

9.  CAVITATION SOUNDS DURING CERVICOTHORACIC SPINAL MANIPULATION.

Authors:  James Dunning; Firas Mourad; Andrea Zingoni; Raffaele Iorio; Thomas Perreault; Noah Zacharko; César Fernández de Las Peñas; Raymond Butts; Joshua A Cleland
Journal:  Int J Sports Phys Ther       Date:  2017-08

10.  Dynamic, but not static, pain sensitivity predicts exercise-induced muscle pain: covariation of temporal sensory summation and pain intensity.

Authors:  Mark D Bishop; Steven Z George; Michael E Robinson
Journal:  Neurosci Lett       Date:  2012-09-20       Impact factor: 3.046

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.