Literature DB >> 18557693

Detection of aberrant responding on a personality scale in a military sample: an application of evaluating person fit with two-level logistic regression.

Carol M Woods1, Thomas F Oltmanns, Eric Turkheimer.   

Abstract

Person-fit assessment is used to identify persons who respond aberrantly to a test or questionnaire. In this study, S. P. Reise's (2000) method for evaluating person fit using 2-level logistic regression was applied to 13 personality scales of the Schedule for Nonadaptive and Adaptive Personality (SNAP; L. Clark, 1996) that had been administered to military recruits (N = 2,026). Results revealed significant person-fit heterogeneity and indicated that for 5 SNAP scales (Disinhibition, Entitlement, Exhibitionism, Negative Temperament, and Workaholism), the scale was more discriminating for some people than for others. Possible causes of aberrant responding were explored with several covariates. On all 5 scales, severe pathology emerged as a key influence on responses, and there was evidence of differential test functioning with respect to gender, ethnicity, or both. Other potential sources of aberrancy were carelessness, haphazard responding, or uncooperativeness. Social desirability was not as influential as expected.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2008        PMID: 18557693      PMCID: PMC2862751          DOI: 10.1037/1040-3590.20.2.159

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Psychol Assess        ISSN: 1040-3590


  12 in total

1.  Self-other agreement in personality and affectivity: the role of acquaintanceship, trait visibility, and assumed similarity.

Authors:  D Watson; B Hubbard; D Wiese
Journal:  J Pers Soc Psychol       Date:  2000-03

2.  Factorial structure of pathological personality as evaluated by peers.

Authors:  Cannon Thomas; Eric Turkheimer; Thomas F Oltmanns
Journal:  J Abnorm Psychol       Date:  2003-02

3.  How many IRT parameters does it take to model psychopathology items?

Authors:  Steven P Reise; Niels G Waller
Journal:  Psychol Methods       Date:  2003-06

4.  Self- and other-reports of traits from the five-factor model: relations to personality disorder.

Authors:  Joshua D Miller; Paul A Pilkonis; Allan Clifton
Journal:  J Pers Disord       Date:  2005-08

5.  What do you learn about someone over time? The relationship between length of acquaintance and consensus and self-other agreement in judgments of personality.

Authors:  Jeremy C Biesanz; Stephen G West; Allison Millevoi
Journal:  J Pers Soc Psychol       Date:  2007-01

6.  Ramsay-curve item response theory (RC-IRT) to detect and correct for nonnormal latent variables.

Authors:  Carol M Woods
Journal:  Psychol Methods       Date:  2006-09

7.  On the invalidity of validity scales: evidence from self-reports and observer ratings in volunteer samples.

Authors:  R L Piedmont; R R McCrae; R Riemann; A Angleitner
Journal:  J Pers Soc Psychol       Date:  2000-03

8.  Assessment and diagnosis of personality disorder: perennial issues and an emerging reconceptualization.

Authors:  Lee Anna Clark
Journal:  Annu Rev Psychol       Date:  2007       Impact factor: 24.137

9.  Patients' versus informants' reports of personality disorders in predicting 7 1/2-year outcome in outpatients with depressive disorders.

Authors:  Daniel N Klein
Journal:  Psychol Assess       Date:  2003-06

10.  Detection and validation of unscalable item score patterns using item response theory: an illustration with Harter's Self-Perception Profile for Children.

Authors:  Rob R Meijer; Iris J L Egberink; Wilco H M Emons; Klaas Sijtsma
Journal:  J Pers Assess       Date:  2008-05
View more
  7 in total

1.  Identifying Person-Fit Latent Classes, and Explanation of Categorical and Continuous Person Misfit.

Authors:  Judith M Conijn; Klaas Sijtsma; Wilco H M Emons
Journal:  Appl Psychol Meas       Date:  2015-10-30

2.  Illustration of MIMIC-Model DIF Testing with the Schedule for Nonadaptive and Adaptive Personality.

Authors:  Carol M Woods; Thomas F Oltmanns; Eric Turkheimer
Journal:  J Psychopathol Behav Assess       Date:  2009

3.  Person misfit on the Inventory of Depressive Symptomatology: Low quality self-report or true atypical symptom profile?

Authors:  Judith M Conijn; Philip Spinhoven; Rob R Meijer; Femke Lamers
Journal:  Int J Methods Psychiatr Res       Date:  2016-11-14       Impact factor: 4.035

4.  A Note on the Use of Mixture Models for Individual Prediction.

Authors:  Veronica T Cole; Daniel J Bauer
Journal:  Struct Equ Modeling       Date:  2016-05-09       Impact factor: 6.125

5.  Careless responding in internet-based quality of life assessments.

Authors:  Stefan Schneider; Marcella May; Arthur A Stone
Journal:  Qual Life Res       Date:  2017-12-16       Impact factor: 4.147

6.  Predicting Dropout from Inpatient Substance Use Disorder Treatment: A Prospective Validation Study of the OQ-Analyst.

Authors:  Hanne H Brorson; Espen Ajo Arnevik; Kim Rand
Journal:  Subst Abuse       Date:  2019-08-15

7.  Satisficing in Mental Health Care Patients: The Effect of Cognitive Symptoms on Self-Report Data Quality.

Authors:  Judith M Conijn; L Andries van der Ark; Philip Spinhoven
Journal:  Assessment       Date:  2017-07-13
  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.