Literature DB >> 1855684

Malignant colorectal polyps: venous invasion and successful treatment by endoscopic polypectomy.

J M Geraghty1, C B Williams, I C Talbot.   

Abstract

We reviewed the pathology of 81 malignant colorectal polyps in 80 patients treated by endoscopic polypectomy and assessed the importance of carcinomatous invasion of veins in the stalk (submucosa). All the patients were followed up for at least five years. Venous invasion was present in 30 of the polyps (37%). The histological features of lymphatic invasion were considered too subjective to be of value. Most of the tumours were well or moderately differentiated adenocarcinomas, one was poorly differentiated, and one was a signet ring cell carcinoma. Seventy one patients were treated by polypectomy alone, and 58 of these were alive and well five years later, with no evidence of recurrence. Nine died of unrelated causes within five years, but four died of carcinomatosis: one with recurrent tumour, one with a possible metachronous caecal cancer, and in two patients there was late development of malignancy of uncertain nature. The remaining nine patients underwent surgical resection after initial endoscopic polypectomy because of incompleteness of excision, poor differentiation of the tumour, or a decision by the surgeon. Tumour was not present in the resection specimens apart from a single lymph node deposit in the patient with signet ring cell carcinoma. These nine patients were alive and well without evidence of recurrence five years later. The results reemphasize the necessity of good cooperation between endoscopist and pathologist, meticulous laboratory technique, strict histopathological criteria including examination of resection margins and degree of differentiation of the tumour, and regular endoscopic follow up. Endoscopic polypectomy of pedunculated and sessile malignant polyps is adequate treatment if the lesion can be removed in one piece, the tumour is well or moderately differentiated, and local excision is judged complete by endoscopic and histological criteria. Patients with histologically incompletely excised polyps, containing well or moderately differentiated carcinoma, can be safely managed by conservative treatment provided the endoscopist is certain there is no residual tumour. Venous invasion by tumour is a common finding in malignant colorectal polyps and seems to have no prognostic importance.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1991        PMID: 1855684      PMCID: PMC1378994          DOI: 10.1136/gut.32.7.774

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Gut        ISSN: 0017-5749            Impact factor:   23.059


  18 in total

1.  Colonoscopic screening of persons with suspected risk factors for colon cancer: II. Past history of colorectal neoplasms.

Authors:  S Grossman; M L Milos; I S Tekawa; N P Jewell
Journal:  Gastroenterology       Date:  1989-02       Impact factor: 22.682

Review 2.  Early invasive carcinoma in colonic polyps. A review of the literature with emphasis on the assessment of the risk of metastasis.

Authors:  G M Wilcox; P B Anderson; T A Colacchio
Journal:  Cancer       Date:  1986-01-01       Impact factor: 6.860

3.  Factors influencing the prognosis of early cancer of the rectum.

Authors:  B C Morson
Journal:  Proc R Soc Med       Date:  1966-07

Review 4.  Colorectal adenomas containing invasive carcinoma. Pathologic assessment of lymph node metastatic potential.

Authors:  S Coverlizza; M Risio; A Ferrari; C M Fenoglio-Preiser; F P Rossini
Journal:  Cancer       Date:  1989-11-01       Impact factor: 6.860

5.  Significance of venous and lymphatic invasion in malignant polyps of the colon and rectum.

Authors:  S Muller; I M Chesner; M J Egan; D C Rowlands; M J Collard; E T Swarbrick; J Newman
Journal:  Gut       Date:  1989-10       Impact factor: 23.059

6.  Factors influencing mortality after curative resection for large bowel cancer in elderly patients.

Authors:  L P Fielding; R K Phillips; R Hittinger
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  1989-03-18       Impact factor: 79.321

7.  Prognostic factors in colorectal carcinomas arising in adenomas: implications for lesions removed by endoscopic polypectomy.

Authors:  R C Haggitt; R E Glotzbach; E E Soffer; L D Wruble
Journal:  Gastroenterology       Date:  1985-08       Impact factor: 22.682

Review 8.  Polypectomy or colectomy? Management of 106 consecutively encountered colorectal polyps.

Authors:  J P Christie
Journal:  Am Surg       Date:  1988-02       Impact factor: 0.688

9.  When is endoscopic polypectomy adequate therapy for colonic polyps containing invasive carcinoma?

Authors:  J P Cranley; R E Petras; W D Carey; K Paradis; M V Sivak
Journal:  Gastroenterology       Date:  1986-08       Impact factor: 22.682

10.  Prognostic value of direct spread in Dukes' C cases of rectal cancer.

Authors:  J R Jass; S B Love
Journal:  Dis Colon Rectum       Date:  1989-06       Impact factor: 4.585

View more
  11 in total

1.  Transabdominal transcolonic polypectomy.

Authors:  Edward Alexander Schmitt
Journal:  World J Surg       Date:  2005-10       Impact factor: 3.352

2.  Lymphovascular invasion in colorectal cancer: an interobserver variability study.

Authors:  Elizabeth I Harris; David N Lewin; Hanlin L Wang; Gregory Y Lauwers; Amitabh Srivastava; Yu Shyr; Bashar Shakhtour; Frank Revetta; Mary K Washington
Journal:  Am J Surg Pathol       Date:  2008-12       Impact factor: 6.394

3.  Double immunohistochemistry enhances detection of lymphatic and venous invasion in early-stage colorectal cancer.

Authors:  A J Ervine; H A McBride; P J Kelly; M B Loughrey
Journal:  Virchows Arch       Date:  2015-06-16       Impact factor: 4.064

Review 4.  Clinical outcome of low- and high-risk malignant colorectal polyps: results of a population-based study and meta-analysis of the available literature.

Authors:  Carmela Di Gregorio; Luca Reggiani Bonetti; Carmela de Gaetani; Monica Pedroni; Shaniko Kaleci; Maurizio Ponz de Leon
Journal:  Intern Emerg Med       Date:  2012-03-27       Impact factor: 3.397

5.  Risk factor assessment of endoscopically removed malignant colorectal polyps.

Authors:  P Netzer; C Forster; R Biral; C Ruchti; J Neuweiler; E Stauffer; R Schönegg; C Maurer; J Hüsler; F Halter; A Schmassmann
Journal:  Gut       Date:  1998-11       Impact factor: 23.059

Review 6.  The malignant adenoma: when to operate and when to watch.

Authors:  Peter J Mitchell; Najib Y Haboubi
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2008-03-25       Impact factor: 4.584

7.  The concurrence of histologically positive resection margins and sessile morphology is an important risk factor for lymph node metastasis after complete endoscopic removal of malignant colorectal polyps.

Authors:  Lars Boenicke; Martin Fein; Marco Sailer; Christoph Isbert; Christoph-Tomas Germer; Andreas Thalheimer
Journal:  Int J Colorectal Dis       Date:  2009-11-06       Impact factor: 2.571

8.  Immunohistochemical evaluation of tissue-specific proteolytic enzymes in adenomas containing foci of early carcinoma: correlations with cathepsin D expression and other malignant features.

Authors:  Toshiaki Kunimura; Tomoko Inagaki; Masahiro Wada; Jun Ushio; Kasumi Sato; Tetsuji Enosawa; Masanao Nakashima; Hirotaka Kato; Ryouji Hayashi; Kouji Saitou; Toshio Morohoshi
Journal:  Int J Gastrointest Cancer       Date:  2003

Review 9.  Management of Malignant Adenomas.

Authors:  Jason F Hall
Journal:  Clin Colon Rectal Surg       Date:  2015-12

10.  Management of colorectal polyp cancers.

Authors:  S Naqvi; S Burroughs; H S Chave; G Branagan
Journal:  Ann R Coll Surg Engl       Date:  2012-11       Impact factor: 1.891

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.