Literature DB >> 18556793

Regulation of autolysis-dependent extracellular DNA release by Enterococcus faecalis extracellular proteases influences biofilm development.

Vinai Chittezham Thomas1, Lance R Thurlow, Dan Boyle, Lynn E Hancock.   

Abstract

Enterococci are major contributors of hospital-acquired infections and have emerged as important reservoirs for the dissemination of antibiotic resistance traits. The ability to form biofilms on medical devices is an important aspect of pathogenesis in the hospital environment. The Enterococcus faecalis Fsr quorum system has been shown to regulate biofilm formation through the production of gelatinase, but the mechanism has been hitherto unknown. Here we show that both gelatinase (GelE) and serine protease (SprE) contribute to biofilm formation by E. faecalis and provide clues to how the activity of these proteases governs this developmental process. Confocal imaging of biofilms suggested that GelE(-) mutants were significantly reduced in biofilm biomass compared to the parental strain, whereas the absence of SprE appeared to accelerate the progression of biofilm development. The phenotype observed in a SprE(-) mutant was linked to an observed increase in autolytic rate compared to the parental strain. Culture supernatant analysis and confocal microscopy confirmed the inability of mutants deficient in GelE to release extracellular DNA (eDNA) in planktonic and biofilm cultures, whereas cells deficient in SprE produced significantly more eDNA as a component of the biofilm matrix. DNase I treatment of E. faecalis biofilms reduced the accumulation of biofilm, implying a critical role for eDNA in biofilm development. In conclusion, our data suggest that the interplay of two secreted and coregulated proteases--GelE and SprE--is responsible for regulating autolysis and the release of high-molecular-weight eDNA, a critical component for the development of E. faecalis biofilms.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2008        PMID: 18556793      PMCID: PMC2519388          DOI: 10.1128/JB.00314-08

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Bacteriol        ISSN: 0021-9193            Impact factor:   3.490


  59 in total

Review 1.  What drives bacteria to produce a biofilm?

Authors:  Kimberly K Jefferson
Journal:  FEMS Microbiol Lett       Date:  2004-07-15       Impact factor: 2.742

2.  Bacterial linguistic communication and social intelligence.

Authors:  Eshel Ben Jacob; Israela Becker; Yoash Shapira; Herbert Levine
Journal:  Trends Microbiol       Date:  2004-08       Impact factor: 17.079

Review 3.  Bacterial biofilms: from the natural environment to infectious diseases.

Authors:  Luanne Hall-Stoodley; J William Costerton; Paul Stoodley
Journal:  Nat Rev Microbiol       Date:  2004-02       Impact factor: 60.633

4.  Strong biofilm production, antibiotic multi-resistance and high gelE expression in epidemic clones of Enterococcus faecalis from orthopaedic implant infections.

Authors:  Carla Renata Arciola; Lucilla Baldassarri; Davide Campoccia; Roberta Creti; Valter Pirini; Johannes Huebner; Lucio Montanaro
Journal:  Biomaterials       Date:  2008-02       Impact factor: 12.479

5.  Construction of the mobilizable plasmid pMV158GFP, a derivative of pMV158 that carries the gene encoding the green fluorescent protein.

Authors:  Concepción Nieto; Manuel Espinosa
Journal:  Plasmid       Date:  2003-05       Impact factor: 3.466

6.  Cannibalism by sporulating bacteria.

Authors:  José E González-Pastor; Errett C Hobbs; Richard Losick
Journal:  Science       Date:  2003-06-19       Impact factor: 47.728

7.  Influence of origin of isolates, especially endocarditis isolates, and various genes on biofilm formation by Enterococcus faecalis.

Authors:  Jamal A Mohamed; Wenxiang Huang; Sreedhar R Nallapareddy; Fang Teng; Barbara E Murray
Journal:  Infect Immun       Date:  2004-06       Impact factor: 3.441

8.  Contribution of gelatinase, serine protease, and fsr to the pathogenesis of Enterococcus faecalis endophthalmitis.

Authors:  Michael Engelbert; Eleftherios Mylonakis; Frederick M Ausubel; Stephen B Calderwood; Michael S Gilmore
Journal:  Infect Immun       Date:  2004-06       Impact factor: 3.441

9.  Genetic analysis of a high-level vancomycin-resistant isolate of Staphylococcus aureus.

Authors:  Linda M Weigel; Don B Clewell; Steven R Gill; Nancye C Clark; Linda K McDougal; Susan E Flannagan; James F Kolonay; Jyoti Shetty; George E Killgore; Fred C Tenover
Journal:  Science       Date:  2003-11-28       Impact factor: 47.728

10.  Effects of glucose on fsr-mediated biofilm formation in Enterococcus faecalis.

Authors:  Satish K Pillai; George Sakoulas; George M Eliopoulos; Robert C Moellering; Barbara E Murray; Roger T Inouye
Journal:  J Infect Dis       Date:  2004-07-27       Impact factor: 5.226

View more
  110 in total

Review 1.  Biofilm formation by the human pathogen Neisseria meningitidis.

Authors:  Martin Lappann; Ulrich Vogel
Journal:  Med Microbiol Immunol       Date:  2010-04-08       Impact factor: 3.402

2.  Inhibition of biofilm in Bacillus amyloliquefaciens Q-426 by diketopiperazines.

Authors:  Jian-Hua Wang; Cui-Yun Yang; Sheng-Tao Fang; Jian Lu; Chun-Shan Quan
Journal:  World J Microbiol Biotechnol       Date:  2016-09       Impact factor: 3.312

3.  msaABCR operon positively regulates biofilm development by repressing proteases and autolysis in Staphylococcus aureus.

Authors:  Gyan S Sahukhal; Justin L Batte; Mohamed O Elasri
Journal:  FEMS Microbiol Lett       Date:  2015-01-18       Impact factor: 2.742

Review 4.  Bacterial programmed cell death: making sense of a paradox.

Authors:  Kenneth W Bayles
Journal:  Nat Rev Microbiol       Date:  2014-01       Impact factor: 60.633

5.  Catabolite control protein A controls hydrogen peroxide production and cell death in Streptococcus sanguinis.

Authors:  Lanyan Zheng; Zhijun Chen; Andreas Itzek; Michael Ashby; Jens Kreth
Journal:  J Bacteriol       Date:  2010-10-29       Impact factor: 3.490

6.  Signals, regulatory networks, and materials that build and break bacterial biofilms.

Authors:  Ece Karatan; Paula Watnick
Journal:  Microbiol Mol Biol Rev       Date:  2009-06       Impact factor: 11.056

7.  The 52nd Annual Wind River Conference On Prokaryotic Biology--2008.

Authors:  E Mann; M A Zaunbrecher; K Hitz; G Churchward
Journal:  J Bacteriol       Date:  2008-10-17       Impact factor: 3.490

8.  PrgB promotes aggregation, biofilm formation, and conjugation through DNA binding and compaction.

Authors:  Andreas Schmitt; Kai Jiang; Martha I Camacho; Venkateswara Rao Jonna; Anders Hofer; Fredrik Westerlund; Peter J Christie; Ronnie P-A Berntsson
Journal:  Mol Microbiol       Date:  2018-07-31       Impact factor: 3.501

Review 9.  Enteric bacterial proteases in inflammatory bowel disease- pathophysiology and clinical implications.

Authors:  Ian M Carroll; Nitsan Maharshak
Journal:  World J Gastroenterol       Date:  2013       Impact factor: 5.742

10.  Enterococcus faecalis Gelatinase Mediates Intestinal Permeability via Protease-Activated Receptor 2.

Authors:  Nitsan Maharshak; Eun Young Huh; Chorlada Paiboonrungruang; Michael Shanahan; Lance Thurlow; Jeremy Herzog; Zorka Djukic; Roy Orlando; Rafal Pawlinski; Melissa Ellermann; Luke Borst; Siten Patel; Iris Dotan; Ryan B Sartor; Ian M Carroll
Journal:  Infect Immun       Date:  2015-04-27       Impact factor: 3.441

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.