Literature DB >> 18556090

Cephalic phase insulin release in healthy humans after taste stimulation?

Tino Just1, Hans Wilhelm Pau, Ulrike Engel, Thomas Hummel.   

Abstract

In humans little is known as to whether taste solutions applied to the tongue elicit cephalic phase insulin release (CPIR). The aim of this study was to re-examine if any effect of different taste solutions on CPIR occurs. Under fasting conditions healthy human subjects sipped, and washed out their mouths with eight taste solutions (sucrose, saccharin, acetic acid, sodium chloride, quinine hydrochloride, distilled water, starch, and sodium glutamate) for 45 s and spat them out again. The taste stimuli were not swallowed; they were applied in a randomized order, each on a separate day. Blood collection for determination of plasma glucose and plasma insulin concentrations was performed 3 min before and 3, 5, 7 and 10 min after taste stimulation. Ratings of quality, intensity and hedonic characteristics were also obtained. A significant increase of plasma insulin concentration was apparent after stimulation with sucrose and saccharin. In conclusion, the current data suggest that the sweeteners sucrose and saccharin activate a CPIR even when applied to the oral cavity only.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2008        PMID: 18556090     DOI: 10.1016/j.appet.2008.04.271

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Appetite        ISSN: 0195-6663            Impact factor:   3.868


  38 in total

1.  Glucose elicits cephalic-phase insulin release in mice by activating KATP channels in taste cells.

Authors:  John I Glendinning; Yonina G Frim; Ayelet Hochman; Gabrielle S Lubitz; Anthony J Basile; Anthony Sclafani
Journal:  Am J Physiol Regul Integr Comp Physiol       Date:  2017-02-01       Impact factor: 3.619

2.  Endocrine taste cells.

Authors:  Zaza Kokrashvili; Karen K Yee; Erwin Ilegems; Ken Iwatsuki; Yan Li; Bedrich Mosinger; Robert F Margolskee
Journal:  Br J Nutr       Date:  2014-01-02       Impact factor: 3.718

Review 3.  The endocrinology of food intake.

Authors:  Denovan P Begg; Stephen C Woods
Journal:  Nat Rev Endocrinol       Date:  2013-07-23       Impact factor: 43.330

4.  Integration of Sweet Taste and Metabolism Determines Carbohydrate Reward.

Authors:  Maria Geraldine Veldhuizen; Richard Keith Babbs; Barkha Patel; Wambura Fobbs; Nils B Kroemer; Elizabeth Garcia; Martin R Yeomans; Dana M Small
Journal:  Curr Biol       Date:  2017-08-10       Impact factor: 10.834

Review 5.  Effect of mouth-rinsing carbohydrate solutions on endurance performance.

Authors:  Ian Rollo; Clyde Williams
Journal:  Sports Med       Date:  2011-06-01       Impact factor: 11.136

Review 6.  Non-nutritive Sweeteners and Glycaemic Control.

Authors:  Yoona Kim; Jennifer B Keogh; Peter M Clifton
Journal:  Curr Atheroscler Rep       Date:  2019-11-19       Impact factor: 5.113

Review 7.  An alternative pathway for sweet sensation: possible mechanisms and physiological relevance.

Authors:  Elena von Molitor; Katja Riedel; Michael Krohn; Rüdiger Rudolf; Mathias Hafner; Tiziana Cesetti
Journal:  Pflugers Arch       Date:  2020-10-08       Impact factor: 3.657

8.  Attenuation of saccharin-seeking in rats by orexin/hypocretin receptor 1 antagonist.

Authors:  Angie M Cason; Gary Aston-Jones
Journal:  Psychopharmacology (Berl)       Date:  2013-03-15       Impact factor: 4.530

9.  Genome-wide analysis of gene expression in primate taste buds reveals links to diverse processes.

Authors:  Peter Hevezi; Bryan D Moyer; Min Lu; Na Gao; Evan White; Fernando Echeverri; Dalia Kalabat; Hortensia Soto; Bianca Laita; Cherry Li; Shaoyang Anthony Yeh; Mark Zoller; Albert Zlotnik
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2009-07-28       Impact factor: 3.240

10.  Pancreatic Beta Cell G-Protein Coupled Receptors and Second Messenger Interactions: A Systems Biology Computational Analysis.

Authors:  Leonid E Fridlyand; Louis H Philipson
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2016-05-03       Impact factor: 3.240

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.