Literature DB >> 18554648

Safety and efficacy of supracostal percutaneous nephrolithotomy in pediatric patients.

Ahmed R El-Nahas1, Ahmed A Shokeir, Mahmoud R El-Kenawy, Ahmed M Shoma, Ibrahim Eraky, Ahmed M El-Assmy, Ahmed M Ghaly, Hamdy A El-Kappany.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: This study was conducted to evaluate the safety and efficacy of the supracostal approach for percutaneous nephrolithotomy in pediatric patients.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: We retrospectively reviewed 60 percutaneous nephrolithotomy procedures done in 50 children (32 boys and 18 girls) between 2000 and 2007. Mean patient age was 7 +/- 4 years (range 9 months to 14 years). Noncontrast computerized tomography was the primary radiological investigation for most of the cases. The subcostal approach was used in 40 procedures, and the supracostal approach (above the 12th rib) was required in 20. We compared both approaches regarding preoperative characteristics, stone-free and complication rates, and the need for auxiliary procedures.
RESULTS: The preoperative characteristics of the patients, urinary tracts and stones were comparable for both treatment groups. There were no major complications. Significant bleeding requiring blood transfusion was observed in 3 patients (5%), transient fever in 3 (5%) and urinary leakage through the nephrostomy site in 3 (5%). The distribution of complications among subcostal and supracostal approaches was comparable. Of the 60 renal units 46 (77%) were stone-free after percutaneous nephrolithotomy at discharge from the hospital. Of the remaining 14 units 9 (15%) were stone-free after shock wave lithotripsy and 5 (8%) had insignificant residual stones. Therefore, the overall stone-free rate at 3 months was 92.5%. Comparing the subcostal and supracostal approaches, there were no significant differences between hospital stays, complication rates, unplanned auxiliary procedures, and stone-free rates at discharge home and at 3-month followup.
CONCLUSIONS: Percutaneous nephrolithotomy for treating renal stones in children provides a high degree of safety and efficacy whether a supracostal or subcostal approach is used.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2008        PMID: 18554648     DOI: 10.1016/j.juro.2008.04.046

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Urol        ISSN: 0022-5347            Impact factor:   7.450


  7 in total

Review 1.  Genitourinary intervention in children.

Authors:  Derek J Roebuck
Journal:  Pediatr Radiol       Date:  2010-06-03

Review 2.  Clinical practice: surgical approaches to urolithiasis in children.

Authors:  Kathleen Hwang; Matthew D Mason; Craig A Peters
Journal:  Eur J Pediatr       Date:  2010-12-30       Impact factor: 3.183

Review 3.  Minimally invasive surgical approaches to kidney stones in children.

Authors:  Hasan Serkan Dogan; Serdar Tekgul
Journal:  Curr Urol Rep       Date:  2012-08       Impact factor: 3.092

4.  Outcomes of Mini-Percutaneous Nephrolithotomy in Children and Adolescents: A 10-Year Single-Centre Experience From Kuwait.

Authors:  Mohamed Zeid; Hani Sayedin; Abdulnaser Alsaid; Natrajan Sridharan; Arun Narayanaswa; Subhasis Giri; Fawzi Abul; Shabir Almousawi
Journal:  Cureus       Date:  2022-05-15

Review 5.  Pediatric Interventional Radiology: Non-Vascular Interventions.

Authors:  Devasenathipathy Kandasamy; Shivanand Gamanagatti; Arun Kumar Gupta
Journal:  Indian J Pediatr       Date:  2016-01-14       Impact factor: 1.967

6.  Comparison of children versus adults undergoing mini-percutaneous nephrolithotomy: large-scale analysis of a single institution.

Authors:  Guohua Zeng; Zhijian Zhao; ShawPong Wan; Wen Zhong; Wenqi Wu
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2013-06-24       Impact factor: 3.240

7.  Supracostal percutaneous nephrolithotomy: A prospective comparative study.

Authors:  Maneesh Sinha; Pramod Krishnappa; Santosh Kumar Subudhi; Venkatesh Krishnamoorthy
Journal:  Indian J Urol       Date:  2016 Jan-Mar
  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.