Literature DB >> 18553641

Alternative measures of lipophilicity: from octanol-water partitioning to IAM retention.

Costas Giaginis1, Anna Tsantili-Kakoulidou.   

Abstract

This review describes lipophilicity parameters currently used in drug design and QSAR studies. After a short historical overview, the complex nature of lipophilicity as the outcome of polar/nonpolar inter- and intramolecular interactions is analysed and considered as the background for the discussion of the different lipophilicity descriptors. The first part focuses on octanol-water partitioning of neutral and ionisable compounds, evaluates the efficiency of predictions and provides a short description of the experimental methods for the determination of distribution coefficients. A next part is dedicated to reversed-phase chromatographic techniques, HPLC and TLC in lipophilicity assessment. The two methods are evaluated for their efficiency to simulate octanol-water and the progress achieved in the refinement of suitable chromatographic conditions, in particular in the field of HPLC, is outlined. Liposomes as direct models of biological membranes are examined and phospolipophilicity is compared to the traditional lipophilicity concept. Difficulties associated with liposome-water partitioning are discussed. The last part focuses on Immobilised Artificial Membrane (IAM) chromatography as an alternative which combines membrane simulation with rapid measurements. IAM chromatographic retention is compared to octanol-water and liposome-water partitioning as well as to reversed-phase retention and its potential to predict biopartitioning and biological activities is discussed.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2008        PMID: 18553641     DOI: 10.1002/jps.21244

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Pharm Sci        ISSN: 0022-3549            Impact factor:   3.534


  17 in total

1.  An index for characterization of nanomaterials in biological systems.

Authors:  Xin-Rui Xia; Nancy A Monteiro-Riviere; Jim E Riviere
Journal:  Nat Nanotechnol       Date:  2010-08-15       Impact factor: 39.213

2.  Evaluation of the membrane permeability (PAMPA and skin) of benzimidazoles with potential cannabinoid activity and their relation with the Biopharmaceutics Classification System (BCS).

Authors:  M Javiera Alvarez-Figueroa; C David Pessoa-Mahana; M Elisa Palavecino-González; Jaime Mella-Raipán; Cristián Espinosa-Bustos; Manuel E Lagos-Muñoz
Journal:  AAPS PharmSciTech       Date:  2011-05-04       Impact factor: 3.246

3.  The influence of hydrogen bonding on partition coefficients.

Authors:  Nádia Melo Borges; Peter W Kenny; Carlos A Montanari; Igor M Prokopczyk; Jean F R Ribeiro; Josmar R Rocha; Geraldo Rodrigues Sartori
Journal:  J Comput Aided Mol Des       Date:  2017-01-04       Impact factor: 3.686

Review 4.  In vitro blood-brain barrier models: current and perspective technologies.

Authors:  Pooja Naik; Luca Cucullo
Journal:  J Pharm Sci       Date:  2011-12-27       Impact factor: 3.534

5.  Europium coordination complexes as potential anticancer drugs: their partitioning and permeation into lipid bilayers as revealed by pyrene fluorescence quenching.

Authors:  Valeriya Trusova; Andrey Yudintsev; Ludmila Limanskaya; Galyna Gorbenko; Todor Deligeorgiev
Journal:  J Fluoresc       Date:  2012-10-06       Impact factor: 2.217

6.  Effect of structural modifications on 3-(3,5-dichlorophenyl)-2,4-thiazolidinedione-induced hepatotoxicity in Fischer 344 rats.

Authors:  Niti N Patel; Christine M Crincoli; Douglas M Frederick; Ruy Tchao; Peter J Harvison
Journal:  J Appl Toxicol       Date:  2011-02-21       Impact factor: 3.446

7.  Cytotoxicity of thiazolidinedione-, oxazolidinedione- and pyrrolidinedione-ring containing compounds in HepG2 cells.

Authors:  Alyssa M Keil; Douglas M Frederick; Erina Y Jacinto; Erica L Kennedy; Randy J Zauhar; Nathan M West; Ruy Tchao; Peter J Harvison
Journal:  Toxicol In Vitro       Date:  2015-07-17       Impact factor: 3.500

8.  Comparison of logP and logD correction models trained with public and proprietary data sets.

Authors:  Ignacio Aliagas; Alberto Gobbi; Man-Ling Lee; Benjamin D Sellers
Journal:  J Comput Aided Mol Des       Date:  2022-04-01       Impact factor: 3.686

Review 9.  In vitro cerebrovascular modeling in the 21st century: current and prospective technologies.

Authors:  Christopher A Palmiotti; Shikha Prasad; Pooja Naik; Kaisar M D Abul; Ravi K Sajja; Anilkumar H Achyuta; Luca Cucullo
Journal:  Pharm Res       Date:  2014-08-07       Impact factor: 4.200

10.  A Biophysical Insight of Camptothecin Biodistribution: Towards a Molecular Understanding of Its Pharmacokinetic Issues.

Authors:  Andreia Almeida; Eduarda Fernandes; Bruno Sarmento; Marlene Lúcio
Journal:  Pharmaceutics       Date:  2021-06-12       Impact factor: 6.321

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.