Literature DB >> 18553521

Eeconomic evaluation of alternative ethanol fermentation processes.

B L Maiorella1, H W Blanch, C R Wilke.   

Abstract

Eleven alternative fermentation schemes for ethanol production are compared. Conventional batch, continuous, cell recycle, and immobilized cell processes, as well as membrane, extraction, and vacuum processes which remove ethanol from the broth selectively as it is produced, are considered. The processes are compared on identical bases using a consistent model for the yeast metabolism. Both molasses and cellulose hydrolyzate are considered as feeds. Optimized ethanol plants, including feed preparation, fermentation, and product recovery sections are designed and total costs are projected.

Entities:  

Year:  1984        PMID: 18553521     DOI: 10.1002/bit.260260902

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Biotechnol Bioeng        ISSN: 0006-3592            Impact factor:   4.530


  8 in total

1.  Exploitation of olive oil mill wastewaters and molasses for ethanol production using immobilized cells of Saccharomyces cerevisiae.

Authors:  Anastasios Nikolaou; Yiannis Kourkoutas
Journal:  Environ Sci Pollut Res Int       Date:  2017-12-26       Impact factor: 4.223

2.  Quantitative transcription dynamic analysis reveals candidate genes and key regulators for ethanol tolerance in Saccharomyces cerevisiae.

Authors:  Menggen Ma; Lewis Z Liu
Journal:  BMC Microbiol       Date:  2010-06-10       Impact factor: 3.605

Review 3.  Bioethanol production from fermentable sugar juice.

Authors:  Hossain Zabed; Golam Faruq; Jaya Narayan Sahu; Mohd Sofian Azirun; Rosli Hashim; Amru Nasrulhaq Boyce
Journal:  ScientificWorldJournal       Date:  2014-03-12

4.  Elimination of sucrose transport and hydrolysis in Saccharomyces cerevisiae: a platform strain for engineering sucrose metabolism.

Authors:  Wesley Leoricy Marques; Robert Mans; Eko Roy Marella; Rosa Lorizolla Cordeiro; Marcel van den Broek; Jean-Marc G Daran; Jack T Pronk; Andreas K Gombert; Antonius J A van Maris
Journal:  FEMS Yeast Res       Date:  2017-01-01       Impact factor: 2.796

5.  Metabolic engineering strategies for optimizing acetate reduction, ethanol yield and osmotolerance in Saccharomyces cerevisiae.

Authors:  Ioannis Papapetridis; Marlous van Dijk; Antonius J A van Maris; Jack T Pronk
Journal:  Biotechnol Biofuels       Date:  2017-04-26       Impact factor: 6.040

6.  An engineered non-oxidative glycolytic bypass based on Calvin-cycle enzymes enables anaerobic co-fermentation of glucose and sorbitol by Saccharomyces cerevisiae.

Authors:  Aafke C A van Aalst; Robert Mans; Jack T Pronk
Journal:  Biotechnol Biofuels Bioprod       Date:  2022-10-17

7.  Recovery of glucose from residual starch of sago hampas for bioethanol production.

Authors:  D S Awg-Adeni; K B Bujang; M A Hassan; S Abd-Aziz
Journal:  Biomed Res Int       Date:  2012-12-27       Impact factor: 3.411

8.  Sugar loss and enzyme inhibition due to oligosaccharide accumulation during high solids-loading enzymatic hydrolysis.

Authors:  Saisi Xue; Nirmal Uppugundla; Michael J Bowman; David Cavalier; Leonardo Da Costa Sousa; Bruce E Dale; Venkatesh Balan
Journal:  Biotechnol Biofuels       Date:  2015-11-26       Impact factor: 6.040

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.