Literature DB >> 15911888

Approaches to the study of haptic sensing.

Denise Y P Henriques1, John F Soechting.   

Abstract

This review surveys results from a new approach to the problem of haptic sensing, in which subjects use primarily proximal arm movements to explore the shapes of virtual objects. These shapes are generated using a robotically controlled manipulandum. We begin by summarizing distortions of simple geometric properties (such as the length and orientation of lines) in the haptic perception of space. We then consider the extent to which the sense of more complex shapes (such as quadrilaterals) can be explained by these geometric distortions, i.e., the extent to which the shape of a complex object is synthesized from simpler constituent elements, and some of the sensory cues that may be important in this process. Haptic and visual processing of shapes appear to lead to some similar illusions. However, we argue that the processing of haptic information differs fundamentally from visual processing in that the former requires the integration of information that evolves in time as well as in space.

Mesh:

Year:  2005        PMID: 15911888     DOI: 10.1152/jn.00010.2005

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Neurophysiol        ISSN: 0022-3077            Impact factor:   2.714


  16 in total

1.  Factors influencing the radial-tangential illusion in haptic perception.

Authors:  James McFarland; John F Soechting
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2006-10-12       Impact factor: 1.972

2.  Multiple Factors Underlying Haptic Perception of Length and Orientation.

Authors:  John F Soechting; Martha Flanders
Journal:  IEEE Trans Haptics       Date:  2011-04-21       Impact factor: 2.487

3.  Predicted sensory feedback derived from motor commands does not improve haptic sensitivity.

Authors:  Alessandra Sciutti; Valentina Squeri; Monica Gori; Lorenzo Masia; Giulio Sandini; Jürgen Konczak
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2010-01       Impact factor: 1.972

4.  The effects of secondary task interference on shape reproduction.

Authors:  Blake Cameron Wesley Martin; Denise Y P Henriques
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2009-12-05       Impact factor: 1.972

5.  Differences in curvature between constrained and unconstrained goal-directed movements to haptic targets.

Authors:  Marieke C W van der Graaff; Eli Brenner; Jeroen B J Smeets
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2014-07-10       Impact factor: 1.972

6.  Bimanual proprioception: are two hands better than one?

Authors:  Jeremy D Wong; Elizabeth T Wilson; Dinant A Kistemaker; Paul L Gribble
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2013-12-31       Impact factor: 2.714

Review 7.  Sensorimotor control of contact force.

Authors:  John F Soechting; Martha Flanders
Journal:  Curr Opin Neurobiol       Date:  2008-12-08       Impact factor: 6.627

8.  Predictive mechanisms in the control of contour following.

Authors:  Julian J Tramper; Martha Flanders
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2013-05-07       Impact factor: 1.972

9.  Differential effects of non-informative vision and visual interference on haptic spatial processing.

Authors:  Robert Volcic; Joram J van Rheede; Albert Postma; Astrid M L Kappers
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2008-06-14       Impact factor: 1.972

10.  Perception of hand motion direction uses a gravitational reference.

Authors:  Warren G Darling; Angela N Viaene; Clayton R Peterson; James P Schmiedeler
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2007-12-05       Impact factor: 1.972

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.