Literature DB >> 18552530

[The results of internal fixation of proximal humeral fractures with the PHILOS locking plate].

Mehmet Fatih Korkmaz1, Neslihan Aksu, Abdullah Göğüş, Mürsel Debre, Ayhan Nedim Kara, Zekeriya Uğur Işiklar.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: Proximal and diaphyseal humeral fractures are common especially in the elderly, presenting as a challenging problem due to their high complication rates following surgical treatment. In this prospective study, we evaluated the results of patients treated with the PHILOS (Proximal Humeral Internal Locking System) locking plate, a new technique recently developed by the AO/ASIF.
METHODS: Forty-one patients who were treated with the PHILOS plate for proximal humeral fractures were evaluated in two age groups. Group A included 24 patients (12 males, 12 females; mean age 47 years; range 24 to 64 years) younger than 65 years, and group B involved 17 patients (4 males, 13 females; mean age 78 years; range 67 to 90 years) at or above 65 years. Radiographically, all fractures were classified according to the AO/ASIF system. Surgery was performed with the deltopectoral approach in 10 and two patients, and with a deltoid split in 14 and 15 patients in group A and B, respectively. Functional and radiographic results were evaluated after a mean follow-up of 15 months (range 6 to 28 months).
RESULTS: The mean Constant scores were 95.0 (range 74 to 100) and 92.8 (range 72 to 100) in group A and B, respectively (p>0.05). After six months of surgery, Constant scores and functional outcomes were similar in patients operated on with the deltopectoral approach or deltoid split. There was neither nonunion nor implant failure. Complications included intra-articular screw penetration (n=1), displacement of the greater tuberculum (n=1) with oblique placement of the plate (n=1), insufficient reduction (n=4), and varus displacement of the humeral head (n=3). No avascular necrosis was seen.
CONCLUSION: Locking plate system is superior over other means of fixation methods, particularly in osteoporotic fractures, because it allows early rehabilitation and does not result in implant failure.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2008        PMID: 18552530     DOI: 10.3944/aott.2008.42.2.097

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Acta Orthop Traumatol Turc        ISSN: 1017-995X            Impact factor:   1.511


  6 in total

1.  Plating of proximal fracture of the humerus: a study of 30 cases.

Authors:  C Iacobellis; K Fountzoulas; R Aldegheri
Journal:  Musculoskelet Surg       Date:  2011-03-04

2.  Surgical management of complex proximal humeral fractures: pinning, locked plate and arthroplasty : Clinical results and functional outcome on retrospective series of patients.

Authors:  I Repetto; M Alessio-Mazzola; P Cerruti; F Sanguineti; M Formica; L Felli
Journal:  Musculoskelet Surg       Date:  2017-01-24

3.  The role of locking technology in the upper extremity.

Authors:  Siddharth B Joglekar; Asif M Ilyas
Journal:  J Hand Microsurg       Date:  2010-01-08

4.  The treatment of complex proximal humeral fractures: analysis of the results of 55 cases treated with PHILOS plate.

Authors:  D Fattoretto; A Borgo; C Iacobellis
Journal:  Musculoskelet Surg       Date:  2016-02-01

Review 5.  Locking plate osteosynthesis in displaced 4-part fractures of the proximal humerus.

Authors:  Stig Brorson; Lars H Frich; Annika Winther; Asbjørn Hróbjartsson
Journal:  Acta Orthop       Date:  2011-06-10       Impact factor: 3.717

6.  Effect of surgical approaches on deltoid innervation and clinical outcomes in the treatment of proximal humeral fractures.

Authors:  Mehmet Özbey Büyükkuşcu; Ahmet Kulduk; Abdülhamit Mısır; Engin Çetinkaya; İsmet Yalkın Çamurcu; Şükrü Sarper Gürsu
Journal:  Jt Dis Relat Surg       Date:  2020
  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.