Literature DB >> 18551519

Proton transport inside the biofilm limits electrical current generation by anode-respiring bacteria.

César I Torres1, Andrew Kato Marcus, Bruce E Rittmann.   

Abstract

Anode-respiring bacteria (ARB) in a biofilm anode carry out an oxidation half-reaction of organic matter, producing an electrical current from renewable biomass, including wastes. At the same time, ARB produce protons, usually one proton for every electron. Our study shows how current density generated by an acclimated ARB biofilm was limited by proton transport out of the biofilm. We determined that, at high current densities, protons were mainly transported out of the biofilm by protonating the conjugate base of the buffer system; the maximum current generation was directly related to the transport of the buffer, mainly by diffusion, into and out of the biofilm. With non-limiting acetate concentrations, the current density increased with higher buffer concentrations, going from 2.21 +/- 0.02 A m(-2) with 12.5-mM phosphate buffer medium to 9.3 +/- 0.4 A m(-2) using a 100-mM phosphate buffer at a constant anode potential of E(anode) = -0.35 V versus Ag/AgCl. Increasing the concentration of sodium chloride in the medium (0-100 mM) increased current density by only 15%, indicating that ion migration was not as important as diffusion of phosphate inside the biofilm. The current density also varied strongly with medium pH as a result of the buffer speciation: The current density was 10.0 +/- 0.8 A m(-2) at pH 8, and the pH giving one-half the maximum rate was 6.5. A j-V curve analysis using 100 mM phosphate buffer showed a maximum current density of 11.5 +/- 0.9 A m(-2) and half-saturation potential of -0.414 V versus Ag/AgCl, a value that deviated only slightly from the standard acetate potential, resulting in small anode-potential losses. We discuss the implications of the proton-transport limitation in the field of microbial fuel cells and microbial electrolytic cells. (c) 2008 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2008        PMID: 18551519     DOI: 10.1002/bit.21821

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Biotechnol Bioeng        ISSN: 0006-3592            Impact factor:   4.530


  45 in total

Review 1.  Microbial electrosynthesis - revisiting the electrical route for microbial production.

Authors:  Korneel Rabaey; René A Rozendal
Journal:  Nat Rev Microbiol       Date:  2010-10       Impact factor: 60.633

2.  Influence of external resistance on electrogenesis, methanogenesis, and anode prokaryotic communities in microbial fuel cells.

Authors:  Sokhee Jung; John M Regan
Journal:  Appl Environ Microbiol       Date:  2010-11-12       Impact factor: 4.792

3.  Mass transfer studies of Geobacter sulfurreducens biofilms on rotating disk electrodes.

Authors:  Jerome T Babauta; Haluk Beyenal
Journal:  Biotechnol Bioeng       Date:  2013-09-19       Impact factor: 4.530

4.  Ratiometric imaging of extracellular pH in bacterial biofilms with C-SNARF-4.

Authors:  Sebastian Schlafer; Javier E Garcia; Matilde Greve; Merete K Raarup; Bente Nyvad; Irene Dige
Journal:  Appl Environ Microbiol       Date:  2015-02       Impact factor: 4.792

5.  Quantification of the methane concentration using anaerobic oxidation of methane coupled to extracellular electron transfer.

Authors:  Yaohuan Gao; Hodon Ryu; Bruce E Rittmann; Abid Hussain; Hyung-Sool Lee
Journal:  Bioresour Technol       Date:  2017-06-13       Impact factor: 9.642

6.  Ohmic resistance affects microbial community and electrochemical kinetics in a multi-anode microbial electrochemical cell.

Authors:  Bipro Ranjan Dhar; Hodon Ryu; Jorge W Santo Domingo; Hyung-Sool Lee
Journal:  J Power Sources       Date:  2016-11-01       Impact factor: 9.127

7.  High Biofilm Conductivity Maintained Despite Anode Potential Changes in a Geobacter-Enriched Biofilm.

Authors:  Bipro Ranjan Dhar; Hodon Ryu; Hao Ren; Jorge W Santo Domingo; Junkseck Chae; Hyung-Sool Lee
Journal:  ChemSusChem       Date:  2016-11-21       Impact factor: 8.928

8.  Microbial activity influences electrical conductivity of biofilm anode.

Authors:  Bipro Ranjan Dhar; Junyoung Sim; Hodon Ryu; Hao Ren; Jorge W Santo Domingo; Junseok Chae; Hyung-Sool Lee
Journal:  Water Res       Date:  2017-10-13       Impact factor: 11.236

9.  DIFFUSION IN BIOFILMS RESPIRING ON ELECTRODES.

Authors:  Rs Renslow; Jt Babauta; Pd Majors; H Beyenal
Journal:  Energy Environ Sci       Date:  2012-11-15       Impact factor: 38.532

10.  Initial development and structure of biofilms on microbial fuel cell anodes.

Authors:  Suzanne T Read; Paritam Dutta; Phillip L Bond; Jürg Keller; Korneel Rabaey
Journal:  BMC Microbiol       Date:  2010-04-01       Impact factor: 3.605

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.