Literature DB >> 18551327

Longitudinal comparison study of pressure relief (C-Flex) vs. CPAP in OSA patients.

Diana C Dolan1, Renata Okonkwo, Florian Gfullner, J Randall Hansbrough, Richard J Strobel, Leon Rosenthal.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Continuous positive airway pressure (CPAP) devices with the option of flexible pressure delivery (e.g., C-Flex) are thought to provide an improved degree of comfort and result in better therapeutic adherence while maintaining standard CPAP efficacy. The purpose of this study was to compare adherence and subjective measures of comfort between C-Flex and CPAP treatment.
METHODS: The study was an international, multisite, single-blinded study with participants randomized to either C-Flex or CPAP. Participants completed subjective measures of sleepiness and comfort at baseline, and at 30-, 90-, and 180-day follow-ups. Additionally, compliance data were downloaded from the device at each follow-up. Repeated measures analysis of variance was used to assess the effects of treatment.
RESULTS: There were 138 men and 46 women (average age of 48 +/- 9.2, average Epworth Sleepiness Scale score of 14.9 +/- 3.6, and average diagnostic apnea/hypopnea index (AHI) of 51.9 +/- 27.7). C-Flex and CPAP groups were comparable on baseline measures, achieved comparable AHI on titration, and had comparable PAP pressure requirements. C-Flex users had comparable average hours of use per night and total nights of use across the study, but had a trend (p < .07) toward achieving greater total hours of utilization. While both groups had comparable decreases in sleepiness, C-Flex users reported on visual analog scales greater comfort (64.3 vs. 57.4; p = .01).
CONCLUSIONS: The results of this study demonstrated that C-Flex has comparable resolution of respiratory indices and adherence. Furthermore, C-Flex users reported greater mask comfort.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2008        PMID: 18551327     DOI: 10.1007/s11325-008-0199-1

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Sleep Breath        ISSN: 1520-9512            Impact factor:   2.816


  19 in total

Review 1.  Sleep-related breathing disorders in adults: recommendations for syndrome definition and measurement techniques in clinical research. The Report of an American Academy of Sleep Medicine Task Force.

Authors: 
Journal:  Sleep       Date:  1999-08-01       Impact factor: 5.849

2.  The age and other factors in the evaluation of compliance with nasal continuous positive airway pressure for obstructive sleep apnea syndrome. A Cox's proportional hazard analysis.

Authors:  N Pelletier-Fleury; D Rakotonanahary; B Fleury
Journal:  Sleep Med       Date:  2001-05       Impact factor: 3.492

3.  Pressure-relief continuous positive airway pressure vs constant continuous positive airway pressure: a comparison of efficacy and compliance.

Authors:  Georg Nilius; Andreas Happel; Ulrike Domanski; Karl-Heinz Ruhle
Journal:  Chest       Date:  2006-10       Impact factor: 9.410

4.  Long-term cardiovascular outcomes in men with obstructive sleep apnoea-hypopnoea with or without treatment with continuous positive airway pressure: an observational study.

Authors:  Jose M Marin; Santiago J Carrizo; Eugenio Vicente; Alvar G N Agusti
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  2005 Mar 19-25       Impact factor: 79.321

5.  Treatment adherence and outcomes in flexible vs standard continuous positive airway pressure therapy.

Authors:  Mark S Aloia; Michael Stanchina; J Todd Arnedt; Atul Malhotra; Richard P Millman
Journal:  Chest       Date:  2005-06       Impact factor: 9.410

6.  Long-term compliance with CPAP therapy in obstructive sleep apnea patients and in snorers.

Authors:  J Krieger; D Kurtz; C Petiau; E Sforza; D Trautmann
Journal:  Sleep       Date:  1996-11       Impact factor: 5.849

7.  Can psychological factors help us to determine adherence to CPAP? A prospective study.

Authors:  M R Wild; H M Engleman; N J Douglas; C A Espie
Journal:  Eur Respir J       Date:  2004-09       Impact factor: 16.671

8.  [Expiratory pressure reduction (C-Flex Method) versus fix CPAP in the therapy for obstructive sleep apnoea].

Authors:  M Wenzel; J Kerl; D Dellweg; T Barchfeld; G Wenzel; D Köhler
Journal:  Pneumologie       Date:  2007-07-27

9.  Practice parameters for the use of continuous and bilevel positive airway pressure devices to treat adult patients with sleep-related breathing disorders.

Authors:  Clete A Kushida; Michael R Littner; Max Hirshkowitz; Timothy I Morgenthaler; Cathy A Alessi; Dennis Bailey; Brian Boehlecke; Terry M Brown; Jack Coleman; Leah Friedman; Sheldon Kapen; Vishesh K Kapur; Milton Kramer; Teofilo Lee-Chiong; Judith Owens; Jeffrey P Pancer; Todd J Swick; Merrill S Wise
Journal:  Sleep       Date:  2006-03       Impact factor: 5.849

10.  Relationship between hours of CPAP use and achieving normal levels of sleepiness and daily functioning.

Authors:  Terri E Weaver; Greg Maislin; David F Dinges; Thomas Bloxham; Charles F P George; Harly Greenberg; Gihan Kader; Mark Mahowald; Joel Younger; Allan I Pack
Journal:  Sleep       Date:  2007-06       Impact factor: 5.849

View more
  11 in total

Review 1.  A systematic review of CPAP adherence across age groups: clinical and empiric insights for developing CPAP adherence interventions.

Authors:  Amy M Sawyer; Nalaka S Gooneratne; Carole L Marcus; Dafna Ofer; Kathy C Richards; Terri E Weaver
Journal:  Sleep Med Rev       Date:  2011-06-08       Impact factor: 11.609

2.  Randomized controlled trial comparing flexible and continuous positive airway pressure delivery: effects on compliance, objective and subjective sleepiness and vigilance.

Authors:  Jessie Bakker; Angela Campbell; Alister Neill
Journal:  Sleep       Date:  2010-04       Impact factor: 5.849

3.  The supraglottic effect of a reduction in expiratory mask pressure during continuous positive airway pressure.

Authors:  Maria J Masdeu; Amit V Patel; Vijay Seelall; David M Rapoport; Indu Ayappa
Journal:  Sleep       Date:  2012-02-01       Impact factor: 5.849

4.  Positive airway pressure initiation: a randomized controlled trial to assess the impact of therapy mode and titration process on efficacy, adherence, and outcomes.

Authors:  Clete A Kushida; Richard B Berry; Alexander Blau; Tami Crabtree; Ingo Fietze; Meir H Kryger; Samuel T Kuna; G Vernon Pegram; Thomas Penzel
Journal:  Sleep       Date:  2011-08-01       Impact factor: 5.849

Review 5.  Strategies to augment adherence in the management of sleep-disordered breathing.

Authors:  Bernie Y Sunwoo; Matthew Light; Atul Malhotra
Journal:  Respirology       Date:  2019-07-03       Impact factor: 6.424

Review 6.  Adherence to continuous positive airway pressure treatment for obstructive sleep apnoea: implications for future interventions.

Authors:  Terri E Weaver; Amy M Sawyer
Journal:  Indian J Med Res       Date:  2010-02       Impact factor: 2.375

Review 7.  CPAP and bi-level PAP therapy: new and established roles.

Authors:  Andreea Antonescu-Turcu; Sairam Parthasarathy
Journal:  Respir Care       Date:  2010-09       Impact factor: 2.258

8.  Flexible positive airway pressure improves treatment adherence compared with auto-adjusting PAP.

Authors:  Yuichi Chihara; Tomomasa Tsuboi; Takefumi Hitomi; Masanori Azuma; Kimihiko Murase; Yoshiro Toyama; Yuka Harada; Kensaku Aihara; Kiminobu Tanizawa; Tomohiro Handa; Chikara Yoshimura; Toru Oga; Kazuhiko Yamamoto; Michiaki Mishima; Kazuo Chin
Journal:  Sleep       Date:  2013-02-01       Impact factor: 5.849

9.  Assessment of the impact on compliance of a new CPAP system in obstructive sleep apnea.

Authors:  Alison J Wimms; Glenn N Richards; Adam V Benjafield
Journal:  Sleep Breath       Date:  2013-03       Impact factor: 2.816

10.  Pressure modification or humidification for improving usage of continuous positive airway pressure machines in adults with obstructive sleep apnoea.

Authors:  Barry Kennedy; Toby J Lasserson; Dariusz R Wozniak; Ian Smith
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2019-12-02
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.