Literature DB >> 18550932

How well does a shortened time interval characterize results of a full ambulatory blood pressure monitoring session?

Michael E Ernst1, Cynthia A Weber, Jeffrey D Dawson, Michelle A O'Connor, Wenjiao Lin, Barry L Carter, George R Bergus.   

Abstract

Ambulatory blood pressure monitoring (ABPM) is useful in evaluating cardiovascular risk but requires significant time. The authors examined how closely shortened time intervals correlate with the systolic blood pressure (BP) determined from a full 24-hour ABPM session in 1004 ABPM recordings. After excluding the first hour, Pearson correlations performed for the mean systolic BP of the subsequent 3-, 5-, and 7-hour periods (4, 6, and 8 hours total) with the entire, and remainder of the session, demonstrated greatest improvement in correlation when the session is increased from 4 to 6 hours. Bland-Altman analysis of the 6-hour time period revealed a mean difference of 5.41 mm Hg compared with the full session mean. The authors conclude that 6-hour ABPM can approximate the overall mean BP obtained from full 24-hour ABPM. However, shortened sessions do not characterize the influence of circadian variation on the 24-hour mean BP and may overestimate the 24-hour BP levels.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2008        PMID: 18550932      PMCID: PMC8109856          DOI: 10.1111/j.1751-7176.2008.07784.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Clin Hypertens (Greenwich)        ISSN: 1524-6175            Impact factor:   3.738


  14 in total

1.  Prognostic significance of the nocturnal decline in blood pressure in individuals with and without high 24-h blood pressure: the Ohasama study.

Authors:  Takayoshi Ohkubo; Atsushi Hozawa; Junko Yamaguchi; Masahiro Kikuya; Kaori Ohmori; Mari Michimata; Mitsunobu Matsubara; Junichiro Hashimoto; Haruhisa Hoshi; Tsutomu Araki; Ichiro Tsuji; Hiroshi Satoh; Shigeru Hisamichi; Yutaka Imai
Journal:  J Hypertens       Date:  2002-11       Impact factor: 4.844

2.  Short-term representatives of daytime and night-time ambulatory blood pressures.

Authors:  X Chanudet; N P Chau; P Larroque
Journal:  J Hypertens       Date:  1992-06       Impact factor: 4.844

3.  Ambulatory blood pressure measurement: a trove of hidden gems?

Authors:  Eoin O'Brien
Journal:  Hypertension       Date:  2006-07-31       Impact factor: 10.190

4.  Statistical methods for assessing agreement between two methods of clinical measurement.

Authors:  J M Bland; D G Altman
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  1986-02-08       Impact factor: 79.321

5.  Recommendations for blood pressure measurement in humans and experimental animals: part 1: blood pressure measurement in humans: a statement for professionals from the Subcommittee of Professional and Public Education of the American Heart Association Council on High Blood Pressure Research.

Authors:  Thomas G Pickering; John E Hall; Lawrence J Appel; Bonita E Falkner; John Graves; Martha N Hill; Daniel W Jones; Theodore Kurtz; Sheldon G Sheps; Edward J Roccella
Journal:  Circulation       Date:  2005-02-08       Impact factor: 29.690

6.  Limited (6-h) ambulatory blood pressure monitoring is a valid replacement for the office blood pressure by trained nurse clinician in the diagnosis of hypertension.

Authors:  John W Graves; Carol A Nash; Diane E Grill; Kent R Bailey; Sheldon G Sheps
Journal:  Blood Press Monit       Date:  2005-08       Impact factor: 1.444

7.  The Seventh Report of the Joint National Committee on Prevention, Detection, Evaluation, and Treatment of High Blood Pressure: the JNC 7 report.

Authors:  Aram V Chobanian; George L Bakris; Henry R Black; William C Cushman; Lee A Green; Joseph L Izzo; Daniel W Jones; Barry J Materson; Suzanne Oparil; Jackson T Wright; Edward J Roccella
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  2003-05-14       Impact factor: 56.272

8.  Short-term (six hour), ambulatory blood pressure monitoring.

Authors:  S G Sheps; K R Bailey; P K Zachariah
Journal:  J Hum Hypertens       Date:  1994-12       Impact factor: 3.012

9.  Favorable patient acceptance of ambulatory blood pressure monitoring in a primary care setting in the United States: a cross-sectional survey.

Authors:  Michael E Ernst; George R Bergus
Journal:  BMC Fam Pract       Date:  2003-10-08       Impact factor: 2.497

10.  A cluster randomized trial to evaluate physician/pharmacist collaboration to improve blood pressure control.

Authors:  Barry L Carter; George R Bergus; Jeffrey D Dawson; Karen B Farris; William R Doucette; Elizabeth A Chrischilles; Arthur J Hartz
Journal:  J Clin Hypertens (Greenwich)       Date:  2008-04       Impact factor: 3.738

View more
  4 in total

1.  Influence of patient characteristics on success of ambulatory blood pressure monitoring.

Authors:  Michelle A Fravel; Michael E Ernst; Cynthia A Weber; Jeffrey D Dawson; Barry L Carter; George R Bergus
Journal:  Pharmacotherapy       Date:  2008-11       Impact factor: 4.705

2.  Indication-specific 6-h systolic blood pressure thresholds can approximate 24-h determination of blood pressure control.

Authors:  M E Ernst; G S Sezate; W Lin; C A Weber; J D Dawson; B L Carter; G R Bergus
Journal:  J Hum Hypertens       Date:  2010-06-24       Impact factor: 3.012

3.  Correlation of blood pressure readings from 6-hour intervals with the daytime period of 24-hour ambulatory blood pressure monitoring in pediatric patients.

Authors:  Leslie King-Schultz; Amy L Weaver; Carl H Cramer
Journal:  J Clin Hypertens (Greenwich)       Date:  2012-05-07       Impact factor: 3.738

4.  Is it possible to shorten ambulatory blood pressure monitoring?

Authors:  Talya Wolak; Lior Wilk; Esther Paran; Arik Wolak; Bella Gutmacher; Elena Shleyfer; Michael Friger
Journal:  J Clin Hypertens (Greenwich)       Date:  2013-06-04       Impact factor: 3.738

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.