Literature DB >> 18548925

Initial clinical efficacy of 3-mm implants immediately placed into function in conditions of limited spacing.

Michael S Reddy1, S Jean O'Neal, Sandra Haigh, Ruth Aponte-Wesson, Nico C Geurs.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: The objective of this study was to determine changes in interdental papillae, alveolar bone loss, esthetics, and initial healing survival when 1-piece narrow-diameter implants were immediately loaded in sites with limited tooth-to-tooth spacing.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: One-piece titanium alloy implants with a maximum diameter of 3.0 mm and a resorbable blast surface texture on a square-thread form were evaluated. Digital photographs were made at each clinical visit to assess soft tissue healing. Interproximal soft tissue fill of the embrasure was assessed with a modified Jemt index. Standardized radiographs were made at baseline (implant placement) and at 6 and 12 months postsurgery. Radiographic bone height was measured from a consistent landmark on the implant. A 1-sided t test was used to determine statistical differences of bone height.
RESULTS: Thirty-one implants were placed in 17 subjects. One implant had clinical mobility and was removed, for an overall survival rate of 96.7%. Mean bone height on the day of placement and restoration was 2.33 + 0.73 mm above the first thread. Mean bone height was 1.75 +/- 0.78 mm at 6 months postrestoration and 1.63 +/- 0.81 mm at 12 months postrestoration. There was a statistically significant loss of bone support over the initial 6 months (0.58 mm; P < .01), with no significant progression thereafter (0.12 mm; NS). Complete fill of papillae was found in 92% of maxillary lateral incisor sites and 60% of mandibular incisor sites.
CONCLUSION: The use of 1-piece narrow-diameter immediately loaded implants appears to be an effective prosthetic treatment for areas of limited space.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2008        PMID: 18548925

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants        ISSN: 0882-2786            Impact factor:   2.804


  6 in total

1.  Photoelastic stress analysis in prosthetic implants of different diameters: mini, narrow, standard or wide.

Authors:  Marcelo Coelho Goiato; Alves Aldiéris Pesqueira; Daniela Micheline Dos Santos; Marcela Filié Haddad; Amália Moreno
Journal:  J Clin Diagn Res       Date:  2014-09-20

2.  Replacement of a Congenitally Missing Maxillary Incisor by Implant Supported Prosthesis.

Authors:  Lakshmikanth Krishnappa; Jayakar Shetty; Vahini Reddy; Alok Shah; Sangeeta Prasad; Divya Hedge; Chiranjeevi Reddy
Journal:  J Indian Prosthodont Soc       Date:  2012-12-21

3.  Mechanical analysis of conventional and small diameter conical implant abutments.

Authors:  Izabela Cristina Maurício Moris; Adriana Cláudia Lapria Faria; Maria da Gloria Chiarello de Mattos; Ricardo Faria Ribeiro; Renata Cristina Silveira Rodrigues
Journal:  J Adv Prosthodont       Date:  2012-08-28       Impact factor: 1.904

4.  The Single-tooth Implant Treatment of Congenitally Missing Maxillary Lateral Incisors Using Angled Abutments: A Clinical Report.

Authors:  Suleyman Hakan Tuna; Filiz Keyf; Gurel Pekkan
Journal:  Dent Res J (Isfahan)       Date:  2009

Review 5.  Narrow-diameter implants: are they a predictable treatment option? A literature review.

Authors:  José-Luis Sierra-Sánchez; Amparo Martínez-González; Fernando García-Sala Bonmatí; José-Félix Mañes-Ferrer; Alejandro Brotons-Oliver
Journal:  Med Oral Patol Oral Cir Bucal       Date:  2014-01-01

6.  Narrow diameter implants to replace congenital missing maxillary lateral incisors: A 1-year prospective, controlled, clinical study.

Authors:  Andrea Roccuzzo; Jean-Claude Imber; Jakob Lempert; Mandana Hosseini; Simon Storgård Jensen
Journal:  Clin Oral Implants Res       Date:  2022-07-11       Impact factor: 5.021

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.