Literature DB >> 18548923

Success rates of microimplants in edentulous patients with residual ridge resorption.

Thomas R Morneburg1, Peter A Pröschel.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: Restorative therapy of edentulous mandibles with residual ridge resorption is still a great challenge. Even though implant-supported stabilization of dentures has proved to be of value in these cases, treatment is sometimes problematic, not only due to narrow width of the denture-bearing areas but also because elderly patients are often averse to surgery. Implants with a normal length but a reduced diameter might facilitate therapy in patients with implant-supported dentures. The aim of the present study was to evaluate the clinical success of implants with a small diameter.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: In a prospective study, patients were provided with 2 implants 2.5 mm in diameter (MicroPlant; Brasseler, Lemgo, Germany) in a 2-stage procedure in the intraforaminal area of the edentulous mandible. Subsequently, the patients were monitored in periodic recalls. Periotest value, Gingival Index, and attachment level were monitored at these recall evaluations. Peri-implant bone loss was measured using panoramic radiographs. Patients rated the functionality of their denture using questionnaires administered before and after treatment.
RESULTS: Sixty-seven patients were monitored during an average observation time of 6 years (SD 2.7). The cumulative survival rate of the implants was 95.5%. Clinical and radiographic parameters yielded results comparable to those of implants with a larger diameter. The questionnaire revealed sharp and significant improvement in denture retention and chewing ability after denture stabilization with the implants.
CONCLUSION: The clinical data and the results of the questionnaire clearly indicated that the patients were satisfied with the concept of stabilization of complete mandibular dentures with small-diameter implants.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2008        PMID: 18548923

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants        ISSN: 0882-2786            Impact factor:   2.804


  6 in total

1.  Two versus three narrow-diameter implants with locator attachments supporting mandibular overdentures: a two-year prospective study.

Authors:  Ali M El-Sheikh; Omar F Shihabuddin; Sahar M F Ghoraba
Journal:  Int J Dent       Date:  2012-06-18

2.  Immediate versus delayed loading of strategic mini dental implants for the stabilization of partial removable dental prostheses: a patient cluster randomized, parallel-group 3-year trial.

Authors:  Torsten Mundt; Ahmad Al Jaghsi; Bernd Schwahn; Janina Hilgert; Christian Lucas; Reiner Biffar; Christian Schwahn; Friedhelm Heinemann
Journal:  BMC Oral Health       Date:  2016-07-30       Impact factor: 2.757

3.  A pilot randomised controlled trial evaluating mini and conventional implant retained dentures on the function and quality of life of patients with an edentulous mandible.

Authors:  Sarra Jawad; Craig Barclay; William Whittaker; Martin Tickle; Tanya Walsh
Journal:  BMC Oral Health       Date:  2017-02-15       Impact factor: 2.757

4.  The influence of the number and the type of magnetic attachment on the retention of mandibular mini implant overdenture.

Authors:  Eunjee Lee; Soo-Yeon Shin
Journal:  J Adv Prosthodont       Date:  2017-02-07       Impact factor: 1.904

5.  Narrow- versus mini-implants at crestal and subcrestal bone levels. Experimental study in beagle dogs at three months.

Authors:  José Luis Calvo-Guirado; Carlos Pérez-Albacete; Antonio Aguilar-Salvatierra; José E de Val Maté-Sánchez; Rafael A Delgado-Ruiz; Marcus Abboud; Eugenio Velasco; Gerardo Gómez-Moreno; Georgios E Romanos
Journal:  Clin Oral Investig       Date:  2014-12-11       Impact factor: 3.573

6.  Use of Narrow-Diameter Implants in Completely Edentulous Patients as a Prosthetic Option: A Systematic Review of the Literature.

Authors:  S Storelli; A Caputo; G Palandrani; M Peditto; M Del Fabbro; E Romeo; G Oteri
Journal:  Biomed Res Int       Date:  2021-06-22       Impact factor: 3.411

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.