Literature DB >> 1854861

EMG muscle scanning: comparison to attached surface electrodes.

J M Thompson1, T J Madson, R P Erickson.   

Abstract

Electromyographic (EMG) muscle scanning measures brief samples of integrated muscle action potentials from individual muscles using a hand-held scanner with post-style electrodes. This "scanning" technique is widely used by biofeedback practitioners to quickly assess muscle activity in the diagnosis of musculoskeletal disorders. In an effort to compare muscle scanning with the established technique using attached surface electrodes, ten healthy subjects (25-35 years old) were scanned using 2-second sampling at five bilateral muscle sites while simultaneously monitoring the same sites with surface electrodes. This was repeated using 10-second scanning samplings. Pearson's product-moment correlations between scanning for 2 seconds and prolonged surface recording at all sites were 0.54-0.89. Scanning for 10 seconds improved the correlations to 0.68-0.91. EMG scanning for 2 seconds compares favorably with attached surface electrode recording. Comparisons are further improved by 10-second scans.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1991        PMID: 1854861     DOI: 10.1007/bf01000191

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Biofeedback Self Regul        ISSN: 0363-3586


  8 in total

1.  Effects of skin preparation on data collected using an EMG muscle-scanning procedure.

Authors:  J R Cram; D Rommen
Journal:  Biofeedback Self Regul       Date:  1989-03

2.  The relationship between narrow and wide bandwidth filter settings during an EMG scanning procedure.

Authors:  J R Cram; A Garber
Journal:  Biofeedback Self Regul       Date:  1986-06

3.  Reliability of lumbar paravertebral EMG assessment in chronic low back pain.

Authors:  D K Ahern; M J Follick; J R Council; N Laser-Wolston
Journal:  Arch Phys Med Rehabil       Date:  1986-10       Impact factor: 3.966

4.  Comparison of electromyographic response patterns during posture and stress tasks in chronic low back pain patterns and control.

Authors:  M J Cohen; G A Swanson; B D Naliboff; S L Schandler; D L McArthur
Journal:  J Psychosom Res       Date:  1986       Impact factor: 3.006

Review 5.  The relationship between paraspinal EMG and chronic low back pain.

Authors:  Arie Nouwen; Clarissa Bush
Journal:  Pain       Date:  1984-10       Impact factor: 6.961

6.  Comparison of electromyographic activity in the lumbar paraspinal muscles of subjects with and without chronic low back pain.

Authors:  D J Miller
Journal:  Phys Ther       Date:  1985-09

7.  EMG scanning in the diagnosis of chronic pain.

Authors:  J R Cram; J C Steger
Journal:  Biofeedback Self Regul       Date:  1983-06

8.  Paralumbar muscle activity in chronic low back pain.

Authors:  E Kravitz; M E Moore; A Glaros
Journal:  Arch Phys Med Rehabil       Date:  1981-04       Impact factor: 3.966

  8 in total
  1 in total

Review 1.  EMG scanning norms: caveat emptor.

Authors:  C U Iacono
Journal:  Biofeedback Self Regul       Date:  1991-09
  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.