Literature DB >> 18547208

Reactions of potential jurors to a hypothetical malpractice suit: alleging failure to perform a prostate-specific antigen test.

Michael J Barry1, Pamela H Wescott, Ellen J Reifler, Yuchaio Chang, Benjamin W Moulton.   

Abstract

We conducted focus groups with 47 potential jurors who were presented with different scenarios in a hypothetical malpractice case involving failure to order a PSA test. Better documentation that a patient made an informed decision to decline a PSA test appeared to provide more medical-legal protection for physicians, especially with the use of a decision aid.

Entities:  

Mesh：

Substances：

Year:  2008        PMID： 18547208     DOI： 10.1111/j.1748-720X.2008.00283.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Law Med Ethics        ISSN： 1073-1105            Impact factor:   1.718


  14 in total

1.  Insights from a conference on implementing comparative effectiveness research through shared decision-making.

Authors:  Mary C Politi; Marla L Clayman; Angela Fagerlin; Jamie L Studts; Victor Montori
Journal:  J Comp Eff Res       Date:  2013-01       Impact factor: 1.744

2.  Primary care physicians' use of an informed decision-making process for prostate cancer screening.

Authors:  Robert J Volk; Suzanne K Linder; Michael A Kallen; James M Galliher; Mindy S Spano; Patricia Dolan Mullen; Stephen J Spann
Journal:  Ann Fam Med       Date:  2013 Jan-Feb       Impact factor: 5.166

3.  Can shared decision making increase the uptake of evidence in clinical practice?

Authors:  France Légaré; Michèle Shemilt; Dawn Stacey
Journal:  Frontline Gastroenterol       Date:  2011-04-21

4.  The Effect of Shared Decisionmaking on Patients' Likelihood of Filing a Complaint or Lawsuit: A Simulation Study.

Authors:  Elizabeth M Schoenfeld; Shelby Mader; Connor Houghton; Robert Wenger; Marc A Probst; David A Schoenfeld; Peter K Lindenauer; Kathleen M Mazor
Journal:  Ann Emerg Med       Date:  2019-01-03       Impact factor: 5.721

5.  Health Policy and Shared Decision Making in Emergency Care: A Research Agenda.

Authors:  Brandon C Maughan; Zachary F Meisel; Arjun K Venkatesh; Michelle P Lin; Warren M Perry; Jeremiah D Schuur; Jesse M Pines; Constance L Kizzie-Gillett; William Vaughan; Corita R Grudzen
Journal:  Acad Emerg Med       Date:  2016-12       Impact factor: 3.451

6.  Perceived Appropriateness of Shared Decision-making in the Emergency Department: A Survey Study.

Authors:  Marc A Probst; Hemal K Kanzaria; Dominick L Frosch; Erik P Hess; Gary Winkel; Ka Ming Ngai; Lynne D Richardson
Journal:  Acad Emerg Med       Date:  2016-03-22       Impact factor: 3.451

7.  Does greater patient involvement in healthcare decision-making affect malpractice complaints? A large case vignette survey.

Authors:  Søren Birkeland; Marie Bismark; Michael J Barry; Sören Möller
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2021-07-02       Impact factor: 3.240

8.  Discussing uncertainty and risk in primary care: recommendations of a multi-disciplinary panel regarding communication around prostate cancer screening.

Authors:  Michael Wilkes; Malathi Srinivasan; Galen Cole; Richard Tardif; Lisa C Richardson; Marcus Plescia
Journal:  J Gen Intern Med       Date:  2013-05-07       Impact factor: 5.128

9.  Applying strategies from libertarian paternalism to decision making for prostate specific antigen (PSA) screening.

Authors:  David C Wheeler; Konrad M Szymanski; Amanda Black; David E Nelson
Journal:  BMC Cancer       Date:  2011-04-21       Impact factor: 4.430

Review 10.  Can shared decision-making reduce medical malpractice litigation? A systematic review.

Authors:  Marie-Anne Durand; Benjamin Moulton; Elizabeth Cockle; Mala Mann; Glyn Elwyn
Journal:  BMC Health Serv Res       Date:  2015-04-18       Impact factor: 2.655
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.