| Literature DB >> 18547207 |
Gail Javitt1, Deena Berkowitz, Lawrence O Gostin.
Abstract
In 2007, many legislatures considered, and two enacted, bills mandating HPV vaccination for young girls as a condition of school attendance. Such mandates raise significant legal, ethical, and social concerns. This paper argues that mandating HPV vaccination for minor females is premature since long-term safety and effectiveness of the vaccine has not been established, HPV does not pose imminent and significant risk of harm to others, a sex specific mandate raises constitutional concerns, and a mandate will burden financially existing government health programs and private physicians. Absent careful consideration and public conversation, HPV mandates may undermine coverage rates for other vaccines.Entities:
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2008 PMID: 18547207 DOI: 10.1111/j.1748-720X.2008.00282.x
Source DB: PubMed Journal: J Law Med Ethics ISSN: 1073-1105 Impact factor: 1.718