OBJECTIVE: To assess the prevalence of "best practice" program components across a select sample of organizations, and to explore differences in engagement rates and health risk reduction between organizations using "best-practice" and "common-practice" health management approaches. METHODS: Using a retrospective approach, researchers assigned organizations to a "best practice" or "common-practice" group based on well-defined criteria. The study examined group differences in employee health assessment participation rates, health coaching program participation and completion rates, and organizational-level health risk reduction. RESULTS: Best-practice organizations achieved higher levels of engagement than common-practice organizations in both health assessment and health coaching programs. Population-level and intervention-level health risk reduction was 2.35 and 1.08 times higher, respectively, among best-practice organizations compared with common-practice organizations. CONCLUSIONS: This study demonstrates the contribution of quality program components to superior program engagement rates and health outcomes.
OBJECTIVE: To assess the prevalence of "best practice" program components across a select sample of organizations, and to explore differences in engagement rates and health risk reduction between organizations using "best-practice" and "common-practice" health management approaches. METHODS: Using a retrospective approach, researchers assigned organizations to a "best practice" or "common-practice" group based on well-defined criteria. The study examined group differences in employee health assessment participation rates, health coaching program participation and completion rates, and organizational-level health risk reduction. RESULTS: Best-practice organizations achieved higher levels of engagement than common-practice organizations in both health assessment and health coaching programs. Population-level and intervention-level health risk reduction was 2.35 and 1.08 times higher, respectively, among best-practice organizations compared with common-practice organizations. CONCLUSIONS: This study demonstrates the contribution of quality program components to superior program engagement rates and health outcomes.
Authors: Omolola E Adepoju; Jane N Bolin; Robert L Ohsfeldt; Charles D Phillips; Hongwei Zhao; Marcia G Ory; Samuel N Forjuoh Journal: Popul Health Manag Date: 2013-10-23 Impact factor: 2.459
Authors: C L Brakenridge; B S Fjeldsoe; D C Young; E A H Winkler; D W Dunstan; L M Straker; G N Healy Journal: Int J Behav Nutr Phys Act Date: 2016-11-04 Impact factor: 6.457
Authors: Carlo Ammendolia; Pierre Côté; Carol Cancelliere; J David Cassidy; Jan Hartvigsen; Eleanor Boyle; Sophie Soklaridis; Paula Stern; Benjamin Amick Journal: BMC Public Health Date: 2016-11-25 Impact factor: 3.295
Authors: Leah S Fischer; Jason E Lang; Ron Z Goetzel; Laura A Linnan; Phoebe Gates Thorpe Journal: MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep Date: 2018-10-19 Impact factor: 17.586