Literature DB >> 18544509

Effects of habitat quality and size on extinction in experimental populations.

Blaine D Griffen1, John M Drake.   

Abstract

Stochastic population theory makes clear predictions about the effects of reproductive potential and carrying capacity on characteristic time-scales of extinction. At the same time, the effects of habitat size and quality on reproduction and regulation have been hotly debated. To trace the causal relationships among these factors, we looked at the effects of habitat size and quality on extinction time in experimental populations of Daphnia magna. Replicate model systems representative of a broad-spectrum consumer foraging on a continuously supplied resource were established under crossed treatments of habitat size (two levels) and habitat quality (three levels) and monitored until eventual extinction of all populations. Using statistically derived estimates of key parameters, we related experimental treatments to persistence time through their effect on carrying capacity and the population growth rate. We found that carrying capacity and the intrinsic rate of increase were each influenced similarly by habitat size and quality, and that carrying capacity and the intrinsic rate of increase were in turn both correlated with time to population extinction. We expected habitat quality to have a greater influence on extinction. However, owing to an unexpected effect of habitat size on reproductive potential, habitat size and quality were similarly important for population persistence. These results support the idea that improving the population growth rate or carrying capacity will reduce extinction risk and demonstrate that both are possible by improving habitat quality or increasing habitat size.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2008        PMID: 18544509      PMCID: PMC2603244          DOI: 10.1098/rspb.2008.0518

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Proc Biol Sci        ISSN: 0962-8452            Impact factor:   5.349


  6 in total

Review 1.  Global biodiversity scenarios for the year 2100.

Authors:  O E Sala; F S Chapin; J J Armesto; E Berlow; J Bloomfield; R Dirzo; E Huber-Sanwald; L F Huenneke; R B Jackson; A Kinzig; R Leemans; D M Lodge; H A Mooney; M Oesterheld; N L Poff; M T Sykes; B H Walker; M Walker; D H Wall
Journal:  Science       Date:  2000-03-10       Impact factor: 47.728

2.  Comparing risk factors for population extinction.

Authors:  H Hakoyama; Y Iwasa; J Nakanishi
Journal:  J Theor Biol       Date:  2000-06-07       Impact factor: 2.691

3.  Experimental studies of extinction dynamics

Authors: 
Journal:  Science       Date:  1999-11-05       Impact factor: 47.728

4.  Experimental support of the scaling rule for demographic stochasticity.

Authors:  Robert A Desharnais; R F Costantino; J M Cushing; Shandelle M Henson; Brian Dennis; Aaron A King
Journal:  Ecol Lett       Date:  2006-05       Impact factor: 9.492

5.  Propagule pressure and persistence in experimental populations.

Authors:  John M Drake; Peter Baggenstos; David M Lodge
Journal:  Biol Lett       Date:  2005-12-22       Impact factor: 3.703

6.  Environmental variation, stochastic extinction, and competitive coexistence.

Authors:  Peter B Adler; John M Drake
Journal:  Am Nat       Date:  2008-11       Impact factor: 3.926

  6 in total
  12 in total

1.  The role of habitat quality in fragmented landscapes: a conceptual overview and prospectus for future research.

Authors:  Alessio Mortelliti; Giovanni Amori; Luigi Boitani
Journal:  Oecologia       Date:  2010-04-23       Impact factor: 3.225

2.  Scaling rules for the final decline to extinction.

Authors:  Blaine D Griffen; John M Drake
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2009-01-13       Impact factor: 5.349

3.  Environment, but not migration rate, influences extinction risk in experimental metapopulations.

Authors:  Blaine D Griffen; John M Drake
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2009-09-23       Impact factor: 5.349

4.  Experimental demonstration of a two-phase population extinction hazard.

Authors:  John M Drake; Jeff Shapiro; Blaine D Griffen
Journal:  J R Soc Interface       Date:  2011-03-23       Impact factor: 4.118

5.  Elevated nonlinearity as an indicator of shifts in the dynamics of populations under stress.

Authors:  Vasilis Dakos; Sarah M Glaser; Chih-Hao Hsieh; George Sugihara
Journal:  J R Soc Interface       Date:  2017-03       Impact factor: 4.118

6.  The scaling of population persistence with carrying capacity does not asymptote in populations of a fish experiencing extreme climate variability.

Authors:  Richard S A White; Brendan A Wintle; Peter A McHugh; Douglas J Booker; Angus R McIntosh
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2017-06-14       Impact factor: 5.349

7.  Spatially variable habitat quality contributes to within-population variation in reproductive success.

Authors:  Blaine D Griffen; Alexandra P Norelli
Journal:  Ecol Evol       Date:  2015-03-06       Impact factor: 2.912

8.  Extinction hazards in experimental Daphnia magna populations: effects of genotype diversity and environmental variation.

Authors:  John D Robinson; John P Wares; John M Drake
Journal:  Ecol Evol       Date:  2012-12-21       Impact factor: 2.912

9.  Experimental demonstration of accelerated extinction in source-sink metapopulations.

Authors:  John M Drake; Blaine D Griffen
Journal:  Ecol Evol       Date:  2013-08-22       Impact factor: 2.912

Review 10.  Old concepts, new challenges: adapting landscape-scale conservation to the twenty-first century.

Authors:  Lynda Donaldson; Robert J Wilson; Ilya M D Maclean
Journal:  Biodivers Conserv       Date:  2016-12-05       Impact factor: 3.549

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.