Literature DB >> 18542756

PCPT, MTOPS and the use of 5ARIs: a Canadian consensus regarding implications for clinical practice.

Laurence Klotz1, Fred Saad.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: Two large, recently published, definitive trials evaluated the benefits of 5-alpha reductase inhibitors (5ARIs). The Prostate Cancer Prevention Trial (PCPT) tested the effect of finasteride for prostate cancer prevention and the Medical Therapy of Prostatic Symptoms (MTOPS) tested its effect in benign prostatic hyperplasia (BPH). Both trials were strongly positive. However, the role of 5ARIs in the clinical management of patients remains controversial. The consensus conference, which forms the basis for this report, attempted to develop an expert opinion, based on these studies, as to the optimal use of 5ARIs in patient management.
METHODS: The Canadian Consensus Meeting, organized by the Canadian Urology Research Consortium and the Canadian Urologic Oncology Group, held in Toronto on May 7, 2006, focused on the new data from the PCPT and the MTOPS study. Internationally recognized experts and clinicians discussed the implications of these data on clinical practice and issued a recommendation on the optimal management of patients with BPH.
RESULTS: The Consensus meeting agreed on the following recommendations: The overall results from the PCPT and MTOPS studies are of importance to the urologic, as well as to the greater medical, community.Prostate management guidelines should be updated to include the results from both the MTOPS and the PCPT studies.In the PCPT, the incidence of high-grade cancer was higher in the finasteride-treated group (6.4%), compared with the placebo group (5.1%). Subsequent analyses strongly suggest that this increased prevalence was owing to a detection bias caused by the reduction in prostate volume in patients taking finasteride, compared with patients taking placebo. This resulted in an improved detection at biopsy of high-grade cancer in the finasteride group.In men who have large prostates and lower urinary tract symptoms (LUTS), 5ARIs( section sign) should be considered, both for the treatment of BPH and for prostate cancer risk reduction.For men who are concerned about prostate cancer, it is appropriate to discuss chemoprevention with finasteride.Urologists are encouraged to disseminate these recommendations among other healthcare professionals.

Entities:  

Year:  2007        PMID: 18542756      PMCID: PMC2422920     

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Can Urol Assoc J        ISSN: 1911-6470            Impact factor:   1.862


  13 in total

1.  Assessing prostate cancer risk: results from the Prostate Cancer Prevention Trial.

Authors:  Ian M Thompson; Donna Pauler Ankerst; Chen Chi; Phyllis J Goodman; Catherine M Tangen; M Scott Lucia; Ziding Feng; Howard L Parnes; Charles A Coltman
Journal:  J Natl Cancer Inst       Date:  2006-04-19       Impact factor: 13.506

2.  MTOPS: conclusions about invasive therapy for BPH should be interpreted with caution.

Authors:  Kevin Turner; S Alan McNeill
Journal:  BJU Int       Date:  2004-11       Impact factor: 5.588

3.  The prostate cancer prevention trial: design, biases and interpretation of study results.

Authors:  Phyllis J Goodman; Ian M Thompson; Catherine M Tangen; John J Crowley; Leslie G Ford; Charles A Coltman
Journal:  J Urol       Date:  2006-06       Impact factor: 7.450

4.  Effect of finasteride on the sensitivity of PSA for detecting prostate cancer.

Authors:  Ian M Thompson; Chen Chi; Donna Pauler Ankerst; Phyllis J Goodman; Catherine M Tangen; Scott M Lippman; M Scott Lucia; Howard L Parnes; Charles A Coltman
Journal:  J Natl Cancer Inst       Date:  2006-08-16       Impact factor: 13.506

5.  Estimated impact of the Prostate Cancer Prevention Trial on population mortality.

Authors:  Joseph M Unger; Ian M Thompson; Michael LeBlanc; John J Crowley; Phyllis J Goodman; Leslie G Ford; Charles A Coltman
Journal:  Cancer       Date:  2005-04-01       Impact factor: 6.860

6.  Evidence for a biopsy derived grade artifact among larger prostate glands.

Authors:  Girish S Kulkarni; Rami Al-Azab; Gina Lockwood; Ants Toi; Andrew Evans; John Trachtenberg; Michael A S Jewett; Antonio Finelli; Neil E Fleshner
Journal:  J Urol       Date:  2006-02       Impact factor: 7.450

7.  Combination therapy with doxazosin and finasteride for benign prostatic hyperplasia in patients with lower urinary tract symptoms and a baseline total prostate volume of 25 ml or greater.

Authors:  Steven A Kaplan; John D McConnell; Claus G Roehrborn; Alan G Meehan; Michael W Lee; William R Noble; John W Kusek; Leroy M Nyberg
Journal:  J Urol       Date:  2006-01       Impact factor: 7.450

8.  An economic evaluation of doxazosin, finasteride and combination therapy in the treatment of benign prostatic hyperplasia.

Authors:  Heather McDonald; Margaret Hux; Marc Brisson; Lisa Bernard; J Curtis Nickel
Journal:  Can J Urol       Date:  2004-08       Impact factor: 1.344

9.  EAU 2004 guidelines on assessment, therapy and follow-up of men with lower urinary tract symptoms suggestive of benign prostatic obstruction (BPH guidelines).

Authors:  Stephan Madersbacher; Gerasimos Alivizatos; Jorgen Nordling; Carlos Rioja Sanz; Mark Emberton; Jean J M C H de la Rosette
Journal:  Eur Urol       Date:  2004-11       Impact factor: 20.096

10.  Prevalence of prostate cancer among men with a prostate-specific antigen level < or =4.0 ng per milliliter.

Authors:  Ian M Thompson; Donna K Pauler; Phyllis J Goodman; Catherine M Tangen; M Scott Lucia; Howard L Parnes; Lori M Minasian; Leslie G Ford; Scott M Lippman; E David Crawford; John J Crowley; Charles A Coltman
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2004-05-27       Impact factor: 91.245

View more
  3 in total

1.  [Prevention of uro-oncological diseases].

Authors:  B J Schmitz-Dräger; G Lümmen; E Bismarck; C Fischer
Journal:  Urologe A       Date:  2012-05       Impact factor: 0.639

Review 2.  [Primary prevention of urologic tumors: prostate cancer].

Authors:  B J Schmitz-Dräger; G Lümmen; E Bismarck; C Fischer
Journal:  Urologe A       Date:  2011-10       Impact factor: 0.639

3.  The current practice of screening, prevention, and treatment of androgen-deprivation-therapy induced osteoporosis in patients with prostate cancer.

Authors:  Humaid O Al-Shamsi; Arthur N Lau; Kartika Malik; Abdulaziz Alamri; George Ioannidis; Tom Corbett; J D Adachi; Alexandra Papaioannou
Journal:  J Oncol       Date:  2012-04-30       Impact factor: 4.375

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.