Literature DB >> 18541664

Regulation of histone H4 Lys16 acetylation by predicted alternative secondary structures in roX noncoding RNAs.

Seung-Won Park1, Mitzi I Kuroda, Yongkyu Park.   

Abstract

Despite differences in size and sequence, the two noncoding roX1 and roX2 RNAs are functionally redundant for dosage compensation of the Drosophila melanogaster male X chromosome. Consistent with functional conservation, we found that roX RNAs of distant Drosophila species could complement D. melanogaster roX mutants despite low homology. Deletion of a conserved predicted stem-loop structure in roX2, containing a short GUb (GUUNUACG box) in its 3' stem, resulted in a defect in histone H4K16 acetylation on the X chromosome in spite of apparently normal localization of the MSL complex. Two copies of the GUb sequence, newly termed the "roX box," were functionally redundant in roX2, as mutants in a single roX box had no phenotype, but double mutants showed reduced H4K16 acetylation. Interestingly, mutation of two of three roX boxes in the 3' end of roX1 RNA also reduced H4K16 acetylation. Finally, fusion of roX1 sequences containing a roX box restored function to a roX2 deletion RNA lacking its cognate roX box. These results support a model in which the functional redundancy between roX1 and roX2 RNAs is based, at least in part, on short GUUNUACG sequences that regulate the activity of the MSL complex.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2008        PMID: 18541664      PMCID: PMC2519712          DOI: 10.1128/MCB.00219-08

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Mol Cell Biol        ISSN: 0270-7306            Impact factor:   4.272


  23 in total

1.  Functional integration of the histone acetyltransferase MOF into the dosage compensation complex.

Authors:  Violette Morales; Tobias Straub; Martin F Neumann; Gabrielle Mengus; Asifa Akhtar; Peter B Becker
Journal:  EMBO J       Date:  2004-05-13       Impact factor: 11.598

2.  The Drosophila MSL complex activates the transcription of target genes.

Authors:  Tobias Straub; Gregor D Gilfillan; Verena K Maier; Peter B Becker
Journal:  Genes Dev       Date:  2005-10-01       Impact factor: 11.361

3.  roX1 RNA paints the X chromosome of male Drosophila and is regulated by the dosage compensation system.

Authors:  V H Meller; K H Wu; G Roman; M I Kuroda; R L Davis
Journal:  Cell       Date:  1997-02-21       Impact factor: 41.582

4.  Genes expressed in neurons of adult male Drosophila.

Authors:  H Amrein; R Axel
Journal:  Cell       Date:  1997-02-21       Impact factor: 41.582

5.  The rox1 and rox2 RNAs are essential components of the compensasome, which mediates dosage compensation in Drosophila.

Authors:  A Franke; B S Baker
Journal:  Mol Cell       Date:  1999-07       Impact factor: 17.970

6.  A steroid receptor coactivator, SRA, functions as an RNA and is present in an SRC-1 complex.

Authors:  R B Lanz; N J McKenna; S A Onate; U Albrecht; J Wong; S Y Tsai; M J Tsai; B W O'Malley
Journal:  Cell       Date:  1999-04-02       Impact factor: 41.582

7.  mof, a putative acetyl transferase gene related to the Tip60 and MOZ human genes and to the SAS genes of yeast, is required for dosage compensation in Drosophila.

Authors:  A Hilfiker; D Hilfiker-Kleiner; A Pannuti; J C Lucchesi
Journal:  EMBO J       Date:  1997-04-15       Impact factor: 11.598

8.  The roX genes encode redundant male-specific lethal transcripts required for targeting of the MSL complex.

Authors:  Victoria H Meller; Barbara P Rattner
Journal:  EMBO J       Date:  2002-03-01       Impact factor: 11.598

9.  Epigenetic spreading of the Drosophila dosage compensation complex from roX RNA genes into flanking chromatin.

Authors:  R L Kelley; V H Meller; P R Gordadze; G Roman; R L Davis; M I Kuroda
Journal:  Cell       Date:  1999-08-20       Impact factor: 41.582

10.  Extent of chromatin spreading determined by roX RNA recruitment of MSL proteins.

Authors:  Yongkyu Park; Richard L Kelley; Hyangyee Oh; Mitzi I Kuroda; Victoria H Meller
Journal:  Science       Date:  2002-11-22       Impact factor: 47.728

View more
  19 in total

Review 1.  Divergent actions of long noncoding RNAs on X-chromosome remodelling in mammals and Drosophila achieve the same end result: dosage compensation.

Authors:  Subhash C Lakhotia
Journal:  J Genet       Date:  2015-12       Impact factor: 1.166

Review 2.  Drosophila dosage compensation: a complex voyage to the X chromosome.

Authors:  Marnie E Gelbart; Mitzi I Kuroda
Journal:  Development       Date:  2009-05       Impact factor: 6.868

Review 3.  Dosage Compensation in Drosophila-a Model for the Coordinate Regulation of Transcription.

Authors:  Mitzi I Kuroda; Andres Hilfiker; John C Lucchesi
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2016-10       Impact factor: 4.562

Review 4.  Evolution to the rescue: using comparative genomics to understand long non-coding RNAs.

Authors:  Igor Ulitsky
Journal:  Nat Rev Genet       Date:  2016-08-30       Impact factor: 53.242

Review 5.  Evolution of Genome-Organizing Long Non-coding RNAs in Metazoans.

Authors:  América Ramírez-Colmenero; Katarzyna Oktaba; Selene L Fernandez-Valverde
Journal:  Front Genet       Date:  2020-11-30       Impact factor: 4.599

Review 6.  Structured non-coding RNAs and the RNP Renaissance.

Authors:  J Robert Hogg; Kathleen Collins
Journal:  Curr Opin Chem Biol       Date:  2008-10-23       Impact factor: 8.822

7.  Imprinting of the Y chromosome influences dosage compensation in roX1 roX2 Drosophila melanogaster.

Authors:  Debashish U Menon; Victoria H Meller
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2009-08-24       Impact factor: 4.562

8.  Tandem stem-loops in roX RNAs act together to mediate X chromosome dosage compensation in Drosophila.

Authors:  Ibrahim Avsar Ilik; Jeffrey J Quinn; Plamen Georgiev; Filipe Tavares-Cadete; Daniel Maticzka; Sarah Toscano; Yue Wan; Robert C Spitale; Nicholas Luscombe; Rolf Backofen; Howard Y Chang; Asifa Akhtar
Journal:  Mol Cell       Date:  2013-07-25       Impact factor: 17.970

9.  Molecularly severe roX1 mutations contribute to dosage compensation in Drosophila.

Authors:  Xinxian Deng; Victoria H Meller
Journal:  Genesis       Date:  2009-01       Impact factor: 2.487

10.  X chromosomal regulation in flies: when less is more.

Authors:  Erinc Hallacli; Asifa Akhtar
Journal:  Chromosome Res       Date:  2009       Impact factor: 5.239

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.