BACKGROUND: A major part of medical pathology in internal medicine is associated with chronic alcoholism. The aim of the current study was to investigate whether screening for Alcohol Use Disorders (AUD) can be improved through determination of direct ethanol metabolites compared to traditional biological state markers, the Alcohol Use Disorders Identification Test (AUDIT) and additional self-reports beyond the detection time period of a positive blood alcohol concentration (BAC). METHODS: A total of 74 blood alcohol negative male patients who presented at the emergency room with either thoracic or gastrointestinal complaints were included. Phosphatidylethanol (PEth) was determined in whole blood, and ethyl glucuronide (EtG) in serum and urine samples. Traditional biological state markers [carbohydrate deficient transferrin (%CDT), gamma glutamyl transpeptidase (GGT), mean corpuscular volume (MCV)] were determined. The AUDIT was obtained and furthermore, all patients completed an additional self-report of alcohol consumption. Patients were divided into two (2) groups: AUDIT scores < 8 and AUDIT scores >or= 8. RESULTS: After assessment of the AUDIT, patients were allocated to one of the following groups: patients with AUDIT scores < 8 (n = 52) and with AUDIT scores >or= 8 (n = 22). Twenty-five percent of the patients with AUDIT scores below the cut-off (n = 13/52) were tested positive for both PEth and UEtG. Of the patients who declared to be sober during the past 12 months, 38.5% were tested positive for PEth and UEtG. PEth discriminated similarly as %CDT for AUDIT scores >or= 8 (AUC: 0.672; 95%CI 0.524 to 0.821). Self-reports of alcohol consumption were unreliable. CONCLUSION: Determination of direct ethanol metabolites such as PEth and UEtG provides additional evidence in screening for AUD in an ER setting. Determination of PEth might be considered complementary with or alternatively to %CDT.
BACKGROUND: A major part of medical pathology in internal medicine is associated with chronic alcoholism. The aim of the current study was to investigate whether screening for Alcohol Use Disorders (AUD) can be improved through determination of direct ethanol metabolites compared to traditional biological state markers, the Alcohol Use Disorders Identification Test (AUDIT) and additional self-reports beyond the detection time period of a positive blood alcohol concentration (BAC). METHODS: A total of 74 blood alcohol negative male patients who presented at the emergency room with either thoracic or gastrointestinal complaints were included. Phosphatidylethanol (PEth) was determined in whole blood, and ethyl glucuronide (EtG) in serum and urine samples. Traditional biological state markers [carbohydrate deficient transferrin (%CDT), gamma glutamyl transpeptidase (GGT), mean corpuscular volume (MCV)] were determined. The AUDIT was obtained and furthermore, all patients completed an additional self-report of alcohol consumption. Patients were divided into two (2) groups: AUDIT scores < 8 and AUDIT scores >or= 8. RESULTS: After assessment of the AUDIT, patients were allocated to one of the following groups: patients with AUDIT scores < 8 (n = 52) and with AUDIT scores >or= 8 (n = 22). Twenty-five percent of the patients with AUDIT scores below the cut-off (n = 13/52) were tested positive for both PEth and UEtG. Of the patients who declared to be sober during the past 12 months, 38.5% were tested positive for PEth and UEtG. PEth discriminated similarly as %CDT for AUDIT scores >or= 8 (AUC: 0.672; 95%CI 0.524 to 0.821). Self-reports of alcohol consumption were unreliable. CONCLUSION: Determination of direct ethanol metabolites such as PEth and UEtG provides additional evidence in screening for AUD in an ER setting. Determination of PEth might be considered complementary with or alternatively to %CDT.
Authors: Andrew K Littlefield; Jennifer L Brown; Ralph J DiClemente; Polina Safonova; Jessica M Sales; Eve S Rose; Nikolay Belyakov; Vadim V Rassokhin Journal: AIDS Behav Date: 2017-07
Authors: Ekaterina Burduli; Jordan Skalisky; Katherine Hirchak; Michael F Orr; Albert Foote; Alexandria Granbois; Richard Ries; John M Roll; Dedra Buchwald; Michael G McDonell; Sterling M McPherson Journal: Clin Trials Date: 2018-08-29 Impact factor: 2.486
Authors: Martin A Javors; Nathalie Hill-Kapturczak; John D Roache; Tara E Karns-Wright; Donald M Dougherty Journal: Alcohol Clin Exp Res Date: 2016-04-30 Impact factor: 3.455
Authors: Paul Marques; Scott Tippetts; John Allen; Martin Javors; Christer Alling; Michel Yegles; Fritz Pragst; Friedrich Wurst Journal: Addiction Date: 2009-11-16 Impact factor: 6.526
Authors: Scott H Stewart; Adrian Reuben; Walter A Brzezinski; David G Koch; Jan Basile; Patrick K Randall; Peter M Miller Journal: Alcohol Alcohol Date: 2009-06-17 Impact factor: 2.826
Authors: Michael Fleming; Bhushan Bhamb; Michael Schurr; Marlon Mundt; Andrea Williams Journal: Alcohol Clin Exp Res Date: 2009-07-23 Impact factor: 3.455
Authors: Michael G McDonell; Jenny R Nepom; Emily Leickly; Astrid Suchy-Dicey; Kait Hirchak; Abigail Echo-Hawk; Stephen M Schwartz; Darren Calhoun; Dennis Donovan; John Roll; Richard Ries; Dedra Buchwald Journal: Contemp Clin Trials Date: 2015-12-17 Impact factor: 2.226