Literature DB >> 18540708

Lateral movement of endografts within the aneurysm sac is an indicator of stent-graft instability.

Benjamin Y Rafii1, Oscar J Abilez, Peyman Benharash, Christopher K Zarins.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: To determine if lateral movement of an aortic endograft 1 year following endovascular abdominal aortic aneurysm (AAA) repair is an indicator of endograft instability and can serve as a predictor of late adverse events.
METHODS: The records of 60 high-risk AAA patients (52 men, 8 women; mean age 74 years) who were treated with infrarenal (n = 38) or suprarenal (n = 22) endografts and had serial computed tomograms (CT) over > or =12 months were analyzed. Postimplantation and 1-year CT scans were compared, and changes in endograft position within the aneurysm sac [lateral movement (LM) versus no lateral movement (NM)] were measured using a vertebral body reference point. Longitudinal endograft movement was measured with respect to the superior mesenteric artery along the aortic centerline axis. Long-term adverse event rates (endoleaks, secondary procedures, conversion, rupture, and death) were assessed.
RESULTS: One year after endograft implantation, LM > or =5 mm was present in 16 (27%) patients; 44 (73%) endografts demonstrated no lateral movement. LM patients had larger aneurysms (6.5+/-1.5 versus 5.6+/-0.9 cm, p = 0.02) and a longer endograft-to-hypogastric artery length (p = 0.01) than NM patients. There were no significant differences between patients treated with infrarenal and suprarenal endografts. At 1 year, longitudinal migration > or =10 mm occurred in 5 (31%) of the LM patients versus 2 (5%) in the NM cohort (p<0.0001). There were no significant differences in adverse event rates between LM and NM at 1 year. However, during long-term follow-up (mean 54+/-26 months, range 12-102), 8 (50%) LM patients developed a type I endoleak versus 8 (18%) NM patients (p = 0.02), and 12 (75%) LM patients required a secondary procedure versus 9 (20%) NM patients (p = 0.0002). One (6%) LM patient experienced aneurysm rupture and 2 (13%) other LM patients underwent conversion to open repair.
CONCLUSION: Lateral endograft movement within the aneurysm sac at 1 year is associated with increased risk of late adverse events and was at least as good a predictor of these complications as was longitudinal migration.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2008        PMID: 18540708     DOI: 10.1583/08-2422.1

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Endovasc Ther        ISSN: 1526-6028            Impact factor:   3.487


  4 in total

1.  Magnitude and direction of pulsatile displacement forces acting on thoracic aortic endografts.

Authors:  C Alberto Figueroa; Charles A Taylor; Allen J Chiou; Victoria Yeh; Christopher K Zarins
Journal:  J Endovasc Ther       Date:  2009-06       Impact factor: 3.487

2.  Effect of curvature on displacement forces acting on aortic endografts: a 3-dimensional computational analysis.

Authors:  C Alberto Figueroa; Charles A Taylor; Victoria Yeh; Allen J Chiou; Christopher K Zarins
Journal:  J Endovasc Ther       Date:  2009-06       Impact factor: 3.487

3.  Preliminary 3D computational analysis of the relationship between aortic displacement force and direction of endograft movement.

Authors:  C Alberto Figueroa; Charles A Taylor; Victoria Yeh; Allen J Chiou; Madhu L Gorrepati; Christopher K Zarins
Journal:  J Vasc Surg       Date:  2010-06       Impact factor: 4.268

4.  Stent-graft surface movement after endovascular aneurysm repair: baseline parameters for prediction, and association with migration and stent-graft-related endoleaks.

Authors:  Ulrika Asenbaum; Maria Schoder; Ernst Schwartz; Georg Langs; Pascal Baltzer; Florian Wolf; Alexander M Prusa; Christian Loewe; Richard Nolz
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2019-06-27       Impact factor: 5.315

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.