Literature DB >> 18539275

In vitro fertilization availability and utilization in the United States: a study of demographic, social, and economic factors.

Ahmad O Hammoud1, Mark Gibson, Joseph Stanford, George White, Douglas T Carrell, Matthew Peterson.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To characterize the demographic correlates of IVF availability and utilization.
DESIGN: Demographic analysis of public data.
SETTING: Each of the 50 states in the United States was used as a unit of analysis. PATIENT(S): Patients undergoing IVF, as demographically estimated. INTERVENTION(S): Publicly available data were collected through the Society for Assisted Reproductive Technology and the Centers for Disease Control. The US Census Bureau data were collected by using software available from the Centers for Disease Control. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE(S): The number of physicians performing IVF and the number of IVF cycles per 100,000 reproductive-age women were used to estimate IVF availability and utilization. RESULT(S): In 2005, 1,031 providers performed 98,242 fresh IVF cycles in 430 centers. Overall availability was 2.5 IVF physicians per 100,000, and utilization was 236 IVF cycles per 100,000. Availability and utilization of IVF were highly correlated. Mean IVF availability and utilization were significantly higher in states with IVF insurance coverage. In adjusted analyses, IVF availability correlated positively with mandated insurance coverage, percentage of single persons, and median income. Utilization of IVF correlated with IVF availability, percentage urbanization, and percentage of individuals >or=25 years of age who had a bachelor's degree. CONCLUSION(S): Lower rates of IVF utilization in some states are correlated with a lack of insurance coverage and decreased availability of physicians providing this service.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2008        PMID: 18539275     DOI: 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2007.10.038

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Fertil Steril        ISSN: 0015-0282            Impact factor:   7.329


  13 in total

1.  A small field for fertile science: the low visibility of reproductive science in high impact journals.

Authors:  Francesca E Duncan; Benjamin Derman; Teresa K Woodruff
Journal:  J Assist Reprod Genet       Date:  2014-03-21       Impact factor: 3.412

2.  Expensive but worth it: older parents' attitudes and opinions about the costs and insurance coverage for in vitro fertilization.

Authors:  Robert D Nachtigall; Kirstin MacDougall; Anne C Davis; Yewoubdar Beyene
Journal:  Fertil Steril       Date:  2011-11-25       Impact factor: 7.329

Review 3.  Origins of lifetime health around the time of conception: causes and consequences.

Authors:  Tom P Fleming; Adam J Watkins; Miguel A Velazquez; John C Mathers; Andrew M Prentice; Judith Stephenson; Mary Barker; Richard Saffery; Chittaranjan S Yajnik; Judith J Eckert; Mark A Hanson; Terrence Forrester; Peter D Gluckman; Keith M Godfrey
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  2018-04-16       Impact factor: 79.321

4.  'Inconvenient biology:' advantages and disadvantages of first-time parenting after age 40 using in vitro fertilization.

Authors:  K Mac Dougall; Y Beyene; R D Nachtigall
Journal:  Hum Reprod       Date:  2012-02-14       Impact factor: 6.918

5.  Infertility treatment in a population-based sample: 2004-2005.

Authors:  Sara E Simonsen; Laurie Baksh; Joseph B Stanford
Journal:  Matern Child Health J       Date:  2012-05

6.  Age shock: misperceptions of the impact of age on fertility before and after IVF in women who conceived after age 40.

Authors:  K Mac Dougall; Y Beyene; R D Nachtigall
Journal:  Hum Reprod       Date:  2012-11-30       Impact factor: 6.918

7.  Use of fertility treatment modalities in a large United States cohort of professional women.

Authors:  Leslie V Farland; Stacey A Missmer; Janet Rich-Edwards; Jorge E Chavarro; Robert L Barbieri; Francine Grodstein
Journal:  Fertil Steril       Date:  2014-04-18       Impact factor: 7.329

8.  Methods for a Retrospective Population-based and Clinic-based Subfertility Cohort Study: the Fertility Experiences Study.

Authors:  Joseph B Stanford; Jessica N Sanders; Sara E Simonsen; Ahmad Hammoud; Mark Gibson; Ken R Smith
Journal:  Paediatr Perinat Epidemiol       Date:  2016-03-23       Impact factor: 3.980

9.  Methodology for establishing a population-based birth cohort focusing on couple fertility and children's development, the Upstate KIDS Study.

Authors:  Germaine M Buck Louis; Mary L Hediger; Erin M Bell; Christopher A Kus; Rajeshwari Sundaram; Alexander C McLain; Edwina Yeung; Elaine A Hills; Marie E Thoma; Charlotte M Druschel
Journal:  Paediatr Perinat Epidemiol       Date:  2014-03-25       Impact factor: 3.980

10.  Condition, disease, disability: how the label used to describe infertility may affect public support for fertility treatment coverage.

Authors:  Abigail C Mancuso; Karen M Summers; Rebecca Chung; Ginny L Ryan; Aaron M Scherer
Journal:  J Assist Reprod Genet       Date:  2021-05-26       Impact factor: 3.412

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.