Literature DB >> 18539078

Recommended lists of genotoxic and non-genotoxic chemicals for assessment of the performance of new or improved genotoxicity tests: a follow-up to an ECVAM workshop.

David Kirkland1, Peter Kasper, Lutz Müller, Raffaella Corvi, Günter Speit.   

Abstract

At a recent ECVAM workshop considering ways to reduce the frequency of irrelevant positive results in mammalian cell genotoxicity tests [D. Kirkland, S. Pfuhler, D. Tweats, M. Aardema, R. Corvi, F. Darroudi, A. Elhajouji, H.-R. Glatt, P. Hastwell, M. Hayashi, P. Kasper, S. Kirchner, A. Lynch, D. Marzin, D. Maurici, J.-R. Meunier, L. Müller, G. Nohynek, J. Parry, E. Parry, V. Thybaud, R. Tice, J. van Benthem, P. Vanparys, P. White, How to reduce false positive results when undertaking in vitro genotoxicity testing and thus avoid unnecessary followup animal tests: Report of an ECVAM Workshop, Mutat. Res. 628 (2007) 31-55], recommendations for improvements/modifications to existing tests, and suggestions for new assays were made. Following on from this, it was important to identify chemicals that could be used in the evaluation of modified or new assays. An expert panel was therefore convened and recommendations made for chemicals to fit three different sets of characteristics, namely: This paper therefore contains these three recommended lists of chemicals and describes how these should be used for any test-evaluation programme.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2008        PMID: 18539078     DOI: 10.1016/j.mrgentox.2008.03.008

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Mutat Res        ISSN: 0027-5107            Impact factor:   2.433


  23 in total

Review 1.  How accurate is in vitro prediction of carcinogenicity?

Authors:  Richard Maurice Walmsley; Nicholas Billinton
Journal:  Br J Pharmacol       Date:  2011-03       Impact factor: 8.739

2.  Rat Pig-a mutation assay responds to the genotoxic carcinogen ethyl carbamate but not the non-genotoxic carcinogen methyl carbamate.

Authors:  Jeffrey C Bemis; Carson Labash; Svetlana L Avlasevich; Kristine Carlson; Ariel Berg; Dorothea K Torous; Matthew Barragato; James T MacGregor; Stephen D Dertinger
Journal:  Mutagenesis       Date:  2015-04-01       Impact factor: 3.000

3.  The Extended ToxTracker Assay Discriminates Between Induction of DNA Damage, Oxidative Stress, and Protein Misfolding.

Authors:  Giel Hendriks; Remco S Derr; Branislav Misovic; Bruno Morolli; Fabienne M G R Calléja; Harry Vrieling
Journal:  Toxicol Sci       Date:  2015-12-29       Impact factor: 4.849

4.  Interlaboratory evaluation of a multiplexed high information content in vitro genotoxicity assay.

Authors:  Steven M Bryce; Derek T Bernacki; Jeffrey C Bemis; Richard A Spellman; Maria E Engel; Maik Schuler; Elisabeth Lorge; Pekka T Heikkinen; Ulrike Hemmann; Véronique Thybaud; Sabrina Wilde; Nina Queisser; Andreas Sutter; Andreas Zeller; Melanie Guérard; David Kirkland; Stephen D Dertinger
Journal:  Environ Mol Mutagen       Date:  2017-04       Impact factor: 3.216

5.  Predictions of genotoxic potential, mode of action, molecular targets, and potency via a tiered multiflow® assay data analysis strategy.

Authors:  Stephen D Dertinger; Andrew R Kraynak; Ryan P Wheeldon; Derek T Bernacki; Steven M Bryce; Nikki Hall; Jeffrey C Bemis; Sheila M Galloway; Patricia A Escobar; George E Johnson
Journal:  Environ Mol Mutagen       Date:  2019-02-27       Impact factor: 3.216

6.  Comet assay evaluation of six chemicals of known genotoxic potential in rats.

Authors:  Cheryl A Hobbs; Leslie Recio; Michael Streicker; Molly H Boyle; Jin Tanaka; Atsushi Shiga; Kristine L Witt
Journal:  Mutat Res Genet Toxicol Environ Mutagen       Date:  2015-03-07       Impact factor: 2.873

7.  γH2AX and p53 responses in TK6 cells discriminate promutagens and nongenotoxicants in the presence of rat liver S9.

Authors:  Derek T Bernacki; Steven M Bryce; Jeffrey C Bemis; David Kirkland; Stephen D Dertinger
Journal:  Environ Mol Mutagen       Date:  2016-07-01       Impact factor: 3.216

8.  Efficient monitoring of in vivo pig-a gene mutation and chromosomal damage: summary of 7 published studies and results from 11 new reference compounds.

Authors:  Stephen D Dertinger; Souk Phonethepswath; Svetlana L Avlasevich; Dorothea K Torous; Jared Mereness; Steven M Bryce; Jeffrey C Bemis; Sara Bell; Pamela Weller; James T Macgregor
Journal:  Toxicol Sci       Date:  2012-08-24       Impact factor: 4.849

9.  Genotoxic mode of action predictions from a multiplexed flow cytometric assay and a machine learning approach.

Authors:  Steven M Bryce; Derek T Bernacki; Jeffrey C Bemis; Stephen D Dertinger
Journal:  Environ Mol Mutagen       Date:  2016-01-13       Impact factor: 3.216

10.  Sensitive CometChip assay for screening potentially carcinogenic DNA adducts by trapping DNA repair intermediates.

Authors:  Le P Ngo; Norah A Owiti; Carol Swartz; John Winters; Yang Su; Jing Ge; Aoli Xiong; Jongyoon Han; Leslie Recio; Leona D Samson; Bevin P Engelward
Journal:  Nucleic Acids Res       Date:  2020-02-20       Impact factor: 16.971

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.