Literature DB >> 18538986

Pressure distributions in a static physical model of the hemilarynx: measurements and computations.

Lewis P Fulcher1, Ronald C Scherer, Kenneth J De Witt, Pushkal Thapa, Yang Bo, Bogdan R Kucinschi.   

Abstract

An experimental study of the pressure distributions in an asymmetric larynx, hereafter referred to as a hemilarynx, was carried out at a glottal diameter of 0.04 cm and transglottal pressures of 3, 5, 10, 20, and 40 cm H(2)O. In each case, the glottal wall "on the left" was chosen to have an angle of 0 degrees with the midline, and the angle of the glottal wall "on the right" was varied through converging angles of 5 degrees, 10 degrees, and 20 degrees and diverging angles of 5 degrees, 10 degrees, and 20 degrees. The case of two parallel glottal walls, or the uniform glottis, was also examined. With the exception of the 20 degrees convergent case, the pressure distributions for most angles and pressures were bistable; that is, a stable flow situation persisted when the glottal exit flow jet was directed downstream either to the right or to the left in the rectangular "pharynx" tunnel. Bistability also occurred for the uniform glottis. Pressure differences arising from the different directions of the flow jet were often found to be small; however, differences for the diverging 10 degrees case were as large as 7% or 8%, and for the 20 degrees divergent case, 12%. Calculations with FLUENT, a computational package, gave excellent agreement with observed pressures. Implications of the pressure distribution data for the functional similarity of normal and hemilaryngeal phonation, hypothesized by Jiang and Titze, are discussed. In particular, the intraglottal pressures for converging and diverging angles for the hemilarynx were found to be quite similar to those of the full larynx with the same diameter and included angle or twice the diameter and twice the included angle, suggesting that the same mechanism of energy transfer operates in the two cases. Nondimensionalizing the pressure distributions with the transglottal pressures suggests that the shapes of the distributions at P=3, 5, 10, 20, and 40 cm H(2)O for a given geometry are similar. The pressure average of these dimensionless distributions may be interpreted as a template at that geometry, a description referred to as successful pressure scaling. When the entire data set is considered, variations from consistent pressure scaling averaged 1.4%, although these variations tend to be somewhat larger near the glottal entrance and for diverging angles of 10 degrees and 20 degrees. Some possible implications of the observed pressures for phonosurgery are discussed. Copyright 2010 The Voice Foundation. Published by Mosby, Inc. All rights reserved.

Mesh:

Year:  2008        PMID: 18538986      PMCID: PMC4804921          DOI: 10.1016/j.jvoice.2008.02.005

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Voice        ISSN: 0892-1997            Impact factor:   2.009


  16 in total

1.  Dynamic glottal pressures in an excised hemilarynx model.

Authors:  F Alipour; R C Scherer
Journal:  J Voice       Date:  2000-12       Impact factor: 2.009

2.  Intraglottal pressure profiles for a symmetric and oblique glottis with a divergence angle of 10 degrees.

Authors:  R C Scherer; D Shinwari; K J De Witt; C Zhang; B R Kucinschi; A A Afjeh
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2001-04       Impact factor: 1.840

3.  Flow visualization and pressure distributions in a model of the glottis with a symmetric and oblique divergent angle of 10 degrees.

Authors:  Daoud Shinwari; Ronald C Scherer; Kenneth J DeWitt; Abdollah A Afjeh
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2003-01       Impact factor: 1.840

4.  Vocal nodules and polyps: laryngeal tissue reaction to habitual hyperkinetic dysphonia.

Authors:  G E ARNOLD
Journal:  J Speech Hear Disord       Date:  1962-08

5.  Flow visualization and acoustic consequences of the air moving through a static model of the human larynx.

Authors:  Bogdan R Kucinschi; Ronald C Scherer; Kenneth J DeWitt; Terry T M Ng
Journal:  J Biomech Eng       Date:  2006-06       Impact factor: 2.097

6.  Conservative surgery of cancer of the larynx.

Authors:  J M ALONSO
Journal:  Trans Am Acad Ophthalmol Otolaryngol       Date:  1947 Jul-Aug

7.  Pressure-flow relationships during phonation as a function of adduction.

Authors:  F Alipour; R C Scherer; E Finnegan
Journal:  J Voice       Date:  1997-06       Impact factor: 2.009

8.  A methodological study of hemilaryngeal phonation.

Authors:  J J Jiang; I R Titze
Journal:  Laryngoscope       Date:  1993-08       Impact factor: 3.325

Review 9.  Measurement of vocal fold intraglottal pressure and impact stress.

Authors:  J J Jiang; I R Titze
Journal:  J Voice       Date:  1994-06       Impact factor: 2.009

10.  Vocal fold polyps and nodules. A 10-year review of 1,156 patients.

Authors:  K Nagata; S Kurita; S Yasumoto; T Maeda; H Kawasaki; M Hirano
Journal:  Auris Nasus Larynx       Date:  1983       Impact factor: 1.863

View more
  7 in total

1.  Viscous effects in a static physical model of the uniform glottis.

Authors:  Lewis P Fulcher; Ronald C Scherer; Travis Powell
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2013-08       Impact factor: 1.840

2.  Phonation threshold pressure: comparison of calculations and measurements taken with physical models of the vocal fold mucosa.

Authors:  Lewis P Fulcher; Ronald C Scherer
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2011-09       Impact factor: 1.840

3.  Validation of a flow-structure-interaction computation model of phonation.

Authors:  Pinaki Bhattacharya; Thomas Siegmund
Journal:  J Fluids Struct       Date:  2014-07-01       Impact factor: 2.917

4.  Vocal fold dynamics in a synthetic self-oscillating model: Intraglottal aerodynamic pressure and energy.

Authors:  Mohsen Motie-Shirazi; Matías Zañartu; Sean D Peterson; Byron D Erath
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2021-08       Impact factor: 2.482

5.  A computational study of systemic hydration in vocal fold collision.

Authors:  Pinaki Bhattacharya; Thomas Siegmund
Journal:  Comput Methods Biomech Biomed Engin       Date:  2013-03-26       Impact factor: 1.763

6.  In vitro experimental investigation of voice production.

Authors:  Stefan Kniesburges; Scott L Thomson; Anna Barney; Michael Triep; Petr Sidlof; Jaromír Horáčcek; Christoph Brücker; Stefan Becker
Journal:  Curr Bioinform       Date:  2011-09-01       Impact factor: 3.543

7.  Universal mechanisms of sound production and control in birds and mammals.

Authors:  C P H Elemans; J H Rasmussen; C T Herbst; D N Düring; S A Zollinger; H Brumm; K Srivastava; N Svane; M Ding; O N Larsen; S J Sober; J G Švec
Journal:  Nat Commun       Date:  2015-11-27       Impact factor: 14.919

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.