Literature DB >> 11325132

Intraglottal pressure profiles for a symmetric and oblique glottis with a divergence angle of 10 degrees.

R C Scherer1, D Shinwari, K J De Witt, C Zhang, B R Kucinschi, A A Afjeh.   

Abstract

Human phonation does not always involve symmetric motions of the two vocal folds. Asymmetric motions can create slanted or oblique glottal angles. This study reports intraglottal pressure profiles for a Plexiglas model of the larynx with a glottis having a 10-degree divergence angle and either a symmetric orientation or an oblique angle of 15 degrees. For the oblique glottis, one side was divergent and the other convergent. The vocal fold surfaces had 14 pressure taps. The minimal glottal diameter was held constant at 0.04 cm. Results indicated that for either the symmetric or oblique case, the pressure profiles were different on the two sides of the glottis except for the symmetric geometry for a transglottal pressure of 3 cm H2O. For the symmetric case, flow separation created lower pressures on the side where the flow stayed attached to the wall, and the largest pressure differences between the two sides of the channel were 5%-6% of the transglottal pressure. For the oblique case, pressures were lower on the divergent glottal side near the glottal entry and exit, and the cross-channel pressures at the glottis entrance differed by 27% of the transglottal pressure. The empirical pressure distributions were supported by computational results. The observed aerodynamic asymmetries could be a factor contributing to normal jitter values and differences in vocal fold phasing.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2001        PMID: 11325132     DOI: 10.1121/1.1333420

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am        ISSN: 0001-4966            Impact factor:   1.840


  63 in total

1.  The effect of entrance radii on intraglottal pressure distributions in the divergent glottis.

Authors:  Sheng Li; Ronald C Scherer; MingXi Wan; SuPin Wang
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2012-02       Impact factor: 1.840

2.  Flow-induced vibratory response of idealized versus magnetic resonance imaging-based synthetic vocal fold models.

Authors:  Brian A Pickup; Scott L Thomson
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2010-09       Impact factor: 1.840

3.  Intraglottal pressures in a three-dimensional model with a non-rectangular glottal shape.

Authors:  Ronald C Scherer; Saeed Torkaman; Bogdan R Kucinschi; Abdollah A Afjeh
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2010-08       Impact factor: 1.840

4.  Time-Dependent Pressure and Flow Behavior of a Self-oscillating Laryngeal Model With Ventricular Folds.

Authors:  Fariborz Alipour; Ronald C Scherer
Journal:  J Voice       Date:  2015-04-11       Impact factor: 2.009

5.  Frequency response of synthetic vocal fold models with linear and nonlinear material properties.

Authors:  Stephanie M Shaw; Scott L Thomson; Christopher Dromey; Simeon Smith
Journal:  J Speech Lang Hear Res       Date:  2012-01-23       Impact factor: 2.297

6.  Computational study of false vocal folds effects on unsteady airflows through static models of the human larynx.

Authors:  Charles Farbos de Luzan; Jie Chen; Mihai Mihaescu; Sid M Khosla; Ephraim Gutmark
Journal:  J Biomech       Date:  2015-03-19       Impact factor: 2.712

7.  Influence of flow separation location on phonation onset.

Authors:  Zhaoyan Zhang
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2008-09       Impact factor: 1.840

8.  Reducing the number of vocal fold mechanical tissue properties: evaluation of the incompressibility and planar displacement assumptions.

Authors:  Douglas D Cook; Eric Nauman; Luc Mongeau
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2008-12       Impact factor: 1.840

9.  Cycle-to-cycle flow variations in a square duct with a symmetrically oscillating constriction.

Authors:  Erica Sherman; Lori Lambert; Bethany White; Michael H Krane; Timothy Wei
Journal:  Fluid Dyn Res       Date:  2019-11-27       Impact factor: 1.067

10.  A computational study of systemic hydration in vocal fold collision.

Authors:  Pinaki Bhattacharya; Thomas Siegmund
Journal:  Comput Methods Biomech Biomed Engin       Date:  2013-03-26       Impact factor: 1.763

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.