Literature DB >> 18537382

Distortion product otoacoustic emission fine structure is responsible for variability of distortion product otoacoustic emission contralateral suppression.

Xiao-Ming Sun1.   

Abstract

Alteration of the distortion product otoacoustic emission (DPOAE) level by a contralateral sound, which is known as DPOAE contralateral suppression, has been attributed to the feedback mechanism of the medial olivocochlear efferents. However, the limited dynamic range and large intra- and intersubject variabilities in the outcome of the measurement restrict its application in assessing the efferent function. In this study, the 2f(1)-f(2) DPgram was measured with a high frequency resolution in six human ears, which exhibits a fine structure with the quasiperiodic appearance of peaks and dips. In the presence of contralateral noise, the DPOAE level increased, decreased, or remained unchanged depending on the frequency. At the peaks, DPOAEs were mostly suppressed with a larger change, while those at the dips had greater variance, with increased occurrence of enhancement or no change. The difference between the peak and dip frequencies in the DPOAE-level change was significant. A switch from suppression to enhancement of the DPOAE level or vice versa with a small change in frequency was noted. These results imply that the DPOAE fine structure is a main source of the variability in DPOAE contralateral suppression measurement. The study suggests that the DPOAE contralateral suppression test would be improved if it is conducted for frequencies at major peaks of the DPOAE fine structure.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2008        PMID: 18537382     DOI: 10.1121/1.2912434

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am        ISSN: 0001-4966            Impact factor:   1.840


  9 in total

1.  Considering distortion product otoacoustic emission fine structure in measurements of the medial olivocochlear reflex.

Authors:  Carolina Abdala; Srikanta K Mishra; Tracy L Williams
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2009-03       Impact factor: 1.840

2.  Contralateral acoustic stimulation alters the magnitude and phase of distortion product otoacoustic emissions.

Authors:  Ryan Deeter; Rebekah Abel; Lauren Calandruccio; Sumitrajit Dhar
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2009-11       Impact factor: 1.840

3.  Effects of contralateral acoustic stimulation on spontaneous otoacoustic emissions and hearing threshold fine structure.

Authors:  James B Dewey; Jungmee Lee; Sumitrajit Dhar
Journal:  J Assoc Res Otolaryngol       Date:  2014-09-23

Review 4.  Olivocochlear efferents: Their action, effects, measurement and uses, and the impact of the new conception of cochlear mechanical responses.

Authors:  John J Guinan
Journal:  Hear Res       Date:  2017-12-21       Impact factor: 3.208

Review 5.  Animal-to-Human Translation Difficulties and Problems With Proposed Coding-in-Noise Deficits in Noise-Induced Synaptopathy and Hidden Hearing Loss.

Authors:  Sara Ripley; Li Xia; Zhen Zhang; Steve J Aiken; Jian Wang
Journal:  Front Neurosci       Date:  2022-05-23       Impact factor: 5.152

6.  The effect of contralateral acoustic stimulation on spontaneous otoacoustic emissions.

Authors:  Wei Zhao; Sumitrajit Dhar
Journal:  J Assoc Res Otolaryngol       Date:  2009-10-02

7.  Efferent modulation of pre-neural and neural distortion products.

Authors:  S B Smith; K Ichiba; D S Velenovsky; B Cone
Journal:  Hear Res       Date:  2017-10-26       Impact factor: 3.208

8.  Contralateral suppression of otoacoustic emissions: input-output functions in neonates.

Authors:  Ualace de Paula Campos; Stavros Hatzopoulos; Krzysztof Kochanek; Lech Sliwa; Henryk Skarzynski; Renata Mota Mamede Carvallo
Journal:  Med Sci Monit       Date:  2011-10

9.  Short Term Test-Retest Reliability of Contralateral Inhibition of Distortion Product Otoacoustic Emissions.

Authors:  Mohan Kumar Kalaiah; Alina Lasrado; Nikita Pinto; Usha Shastri
Journal:  J Audiol Otol       Date:  2018-08-22
  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.