Literature DB >> 18534881

Performance of the Plusoptix vision screener for the detection of amblyopia risk factors in children.

Noelle S Matta1, Eric L Singman, David I Silbert.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: To evaluate the accuracy of the Plusoptix vision screener in detecting amblyopia risk factors in the pediatric population and to determine whether modifying the manufacturer's referral criteria improves the clinical utility of the device.
METHODS: We compared the rate and pattern with which the Plusoptix vision screener refers a patient for ophthalmic follow-up to the same metric obtained during a complete pediatric ophthalmic examination using AAPOS guidelines. We then modified the manufacturer's criteria in determining which patients would be referred to improve the clinical usefulness of the machine.
RESULTS: One hundred nine patients were examined. Of these, 53% were found to have amblyopia or amblyopia risk factors. The Plusoptix vision screener referred 67% of these patients, with sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value, and false-negative rates of 98%, 69%, 78%, and 1.4%, respectively. These same metrics with the modified manufacturer's referral criteria were 98%, 88%, 90%, and 1.5%.
CONCLUSIONS: The Plusoptix vision screener is a useful tool for the detection of amblyopia risk factors in pediatric populations. Our study shows that the referral criteria can be internally modified to improve both the specificity and positive predictive value of the device without reducing sensitivity in this study group. The Plusoptix vision screener provides an accurate, fast, user-friendly, and portable way to detect amblyopia risk factors. Because the software automatically evaluates the refractive error and ocular alignment and gives a simple referral grade, the Plusoptix screener may offer a reasonable way of providing large-scale vision screenings at relatively low costs.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2008        PMID: 18534881     DOI: 10.1016/j.jaapos.2008.04.004

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J AAPOS        ISSN: 1091-8531            Impact factor:   1.220


  19 in total

1.  Two-dimensional simulation of eccentric photorefraction images for ametropes: factors influencing the measurement.

Authors:  Yifei Wu; Larry N Thibos; T Rowan Candy
Journal:  Ophthalmic Physiol Opt       Date:  2018-05-07       Impact factor: 3.117

2.  Comparison of non-cycloplegic photorefraction, cycloplegic photorefraction and cycloplegic retinoscopy in children.

Authors:  Ozdemir Ozdemir; Zuhal Özen Tunay; Ikbal Seza Petriçli; Damla Ergintürk Acar; Muhammet Kazım Erol
Journal:  Int J Ophthalmol       Date:  2015-02-18       Impact factor: 1.779

3.  Utilizing minicomputer technology for low-cost photorefraction: a feasibility study.

Authors:  Rajat Agarwala; Alexander Leube; Siegfried Wahl
Journal:  Biomed Opt Express       Date:  2020-10-07       Impact factor: 3.732

4.  Comparison of photorefraction, autorefractometry and retinoscopy in children.

Authors:  Goktug Demirci; Banu Arslan; Mustafa Özsütçü; Mustafa Eliaçık; Gokhan Gulkilik
Journal:  Int Ophthalmol       Date:  2013-10-10       Impact factor: 2.031

5.  Photoscreeners in the pediatric eye office: compared testability and refractions on high-risk children.

Authors:  Mae Millicent W Peterseim; Carrie E Papa; M Edward Wilson; Edward W Cheeseman; Bethany J Wolf; Jennifer D Davidson; Rupal H Trivedi
Journal:  Am J Ophthalmol       Date:  2014-08-01       Impact factor: 5.258

6.  A comparison of referral criteria used by the plusoptiX photoscreener.

Authors:  Eric Singman; Noelle Matta; Jing Tian; David Silbert
Journal:  Strabismus       Date:  2013-09

7.  Is noncycloplegic photorefraction applicable for screening refractive amblyopia risk factors?

Authors:  Zhale Rajavi; Hiva Parsafar; Alireza Ramezani; Mehdi Yaseri
Journal:  J Ophthalmic Vis Res       Date:  2012-01

8.  Validation of the Pediatric Vision Scanner in a normal preschool population.

Authors:  Shaival S Shah; Jennifer J Jimenez; Emily J Rozema; Miki T Nguyen; Melissa Preciado; Ashish M Mehta
Journal:  J AAPOS       Date:  2021-07-10       Impact factor: 1.325

9.  Performance of the Plusoptix A09 photoscreener in detecting amblyopia risk factors in Chinese children attending an eye clinic.

Authors:  Xiao-Ran Yan; Wan-Zhen Jiao; Zhi-Wei Li; Wen-Wen Xu; Feng-Jiao Li; Li-Hua Wang
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2015-06-01       Impact factor: 3.240

Review 10.  Advantages, limitations, and diagnostic accuracy of photoscreeners in early detection of amblyopia: a review.

Authors:  Irene Sanchez; Sara Ortiz-Toquero; Raul Martin; Victoria de Juan
Journal:  Clin Ophthalmol       Date:  2016-07-22
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.