Literature DB >> 18534693

Impulsive choice and environmental enrichment: effects of d-amphetamine and methylphenidate.

Jennifer L Perry1, Dustin J Stairs, Michael T Bardo.   

Abstract

Individual differences in impulsive choice and rearing in differential environments are factors that predict vulnerability to drug abuse. The present study determined if rearing influences impulsive choice, and if d-amphetamine or methylphenidate alters impulsive choice in differentially reared rats. Male Sprague-Dawley rats were raised from 21 days of age in either an enriched condition (EC) or an isolated condition (IC) and were tested as young adults on an adjusting delay task. In this task, two levers were available and a response on one lever yielded one 45mg food pellet immediately, whereas a response on the other yielded three pellets after an adjusting delay. The delay was initially set at 6s, and it decreased or increased by 1s following responses on the immediate or delayed levers, respectively. A mean adjusted delay (MAD) was calculated upon completion of each daily session, and it served as the quantitative measure of impulsivity. Once MADs stabilized, rats were injected with saline, d-amphetamine (0.5, 1.0, or 2.0mg/kg, s.c.), or methylphenidate (2.5, 5.0, or 10.0mg/kg, s.c.) 15min prior to adjusting delay sessions. EC rats had higher baseline MADs (were less impulsive) than IC rats. Additionally, administration of d-amphetamine, but not methylphenidate, dose-dependently increased impulsive choice (decreased MADs) in EC rats. In IC rats, d-amphetamine and methylphenidate dose-dependently decreased impulsivity (increased MADs). These results indicate that rearing environment influences impulsive choice and moderates the effect of psychostimulants on impulsive choice. Specifically, psychostimulants may decrease environment-dependent impulsive choice in individuals with high levels of impulsivity (e.g., those with ADHD), whereas they may increase impulsive choice in individuals with low levels of impulsivity.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2008        PMID: 18534693      PMCID: PMC2681296          DOI: 10.1016/j.bbr.2008.04.019

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Behav Brain Res        ISSN: 0166-4328            Impact factor:   3.332


  89 in total

1.  Environmental enrichment reduces impulsivity during appetitive conditioning.

Authors:  David A Wood; Amy K Siegel; George V Rebec
Journal:  Physiol Behav       Date:  2006-05-05

2.  Response to novelty, social and self-control behaviors, in rats exposed to neonatal anoxia: modulatory effects of an enriched environment.

Authors:  Walter Adriani; Dimitra Giannakopoulou; Zvonimir Bokulic; Branimir Jernej; Enrico Alleva; Giovanni Laviola
Journal:  Psychopharmacology (Berl)       Date:  2005-12-16       Impact factor: 4.530

3.  Neuropsychological function and delay discounting in methamphetamine-dependent individuals.

Authors:  William F Hoffman; Meredith Moore; Raymond Templin; Bentson McFarland; Robert J Hitzemann; Suzanne H Mitchell
Journal:  Psychopharmacology (Berl)       Date:  2006-08-17       Impact factor: 4.530

Review 4.  Chemistry of the mind: neurochemical modulation of prefrontal cortical function.

Authors:  Trevor W Robbins
Journal:  J Comp Neurol       Date:  2005-12-05       Impact factor: 3.215

5.  Effects of methamphetamine on the adjusting amount procedure, a model of impulsive behavior in rats.

Authors:  J B Richards; K E Sabol; H de Wit
Journal:  Psychopharmacology (Berl)       Date:  1999-10       Impact factor: 4.530

6.  Hyperbolic temporal discounting in social drinkers and problem drinkers.

Authors:  R E Vuchinich; C A Simpson
Journal:  Exp Clin Psychopharmacol       Date:  1998-08       Impact factor: 3.157

7.  Impulsivity (delay discounting) as a predictor of acquisition of IV cocaine self-administration in female rats.

Authors:  Jennifer L Perry; Erin B Larson; Jonathan P German; Gregory J Madden; Marilyn E Carroll
Journal:  Psychopharmacology (Berl)       Date:  2004-08-27       Impact factor: 4.530

8.  Behavioral and autonomic responses to intermittent social stress: differential protection by clonidine and metoprolol.

Authors:  W Tornatzky; K A Miczek
Journal:  Psychopharmacology (Berl)       Date:  1994-11       Impact factor: 4.530

9.  Nonmedical use of prescription stimulants among college students: associations with attention-deficit-hyperactivity disorder and polydrug use.

Authors:  Amelia M Arria; Kimberly M Caldeira; Kevin E O'Grady; Kathryn B Vincent; Erin P Johnson; Eric D Wish
Journal:  Pharmacotherapy       Date:  2008-02       Impact factor: 4.705

10.  Heroin and cocaine abusers have higher discount rates for delayed rewards than alcoholics or non-drug-using controls.

Authors:  Kris N Kirby; Nancy M Petry
Journal:  Addiction       Date:  2004-04       Impact factor: 6.526

View more
  60 in total

1.  Delay discounting in Lewis and Fischer 344 rats: steady-state and rapid-determination adjusting-amount procedures.

Authors:  Jeffrey S Stein; Jonathan W Pinkston; Adam T Brewer; Monica T Francisco; Gregory J Madden
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  2012-05       Impact factor: 2.468

Review 2.  Have studies of the developmental regulation of behavioral phenotypes revealed the mechanisms of gene-environment interactions?

Authors:  F Scott Hall; Maria T G Perona
Journal:  Physiol Behav       Date:  2012-05-27

3.  Chronic methylphenidate treatment during early life is associated with greater ethanol intake in socially isolated rats.

Authors:  Kathryn E Gill; Ann M Chappell; Thomas J R Beveridge; Linda J Porrino; Jeffrey L Weiner
Journal:  Alcohol Clin Exp Res       Date:  2014-08       Impact factor: 3.455

4.  Individual differences in impulsive and risky choice: effects of environmental rearing conditions.

Authors:  Kimberly Kirkpatrick; Andrew T Marshall; Aaron P Smith; Juraj Koci; Yoonseong Park
Journal:  Behav Brain Res       Date:  2014-04-24       Impact factor: 3.332

5.  Environmental rearing effects on impulsivity and reward sensitivity.

Authors:  Kimberly Kirkpatrick; Andrew T Marshall; Jacob Clarke; Mary E Cain
Journal:  Behav Neurosci       Date:  2013-10       Impact factor: 1.912

6.  Trust and the poverty trap.

Authors:  Martha J Farah; Cayce J Hook
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2017-05-15       Impact factor: 11.205

7.  D-amphetamine improves attention performance in adolescent Wistar, but not in SHR rats, in a two-choice visual discrimination task.

Authors:  Jean-Charles Bizot; Nicolas Cogrel; Fabienne Massé; Virgile Chauvin; Léa Brault; Sabrina David; Fabrice Trovero
Journal:  Psychopharmacology (Berl)       Date:  2015-06-04       Impact factor: 4.530

8.  Mechanisms of Individual Differences in Impulsive and Risky Choice in Rats.

Authors:  Kimberly Kirkpatrick; Andrew T Marshall; Aaron P Smith
Journal:  Comp Cogn Behav Rev       Date:  2015

Review 9.  Experimental reductions of delay discounting and impulsive choice: A systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Jillian M Rung; Gregory J Madden
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Gen       Date:  2018-09

10.  Impulsive choice and response in dopamine agonist-related impulse control behaviors.

Authors:  Valerie Voon; Brady Reynolds; Christina Brezing; Cecile Gallea; Meliha Skaljic; Vindhya Ekanayake; Hubert Fernandez; Marc N Potenza; Raymond J Dolan; Mark Hallett
Journal:  Psychopharmacology (Berl)       Date:  2009-10-20       Impact factor: 4.530

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.