Literature DB >> 18534510

One-stage revision of infected total hip arthroplasty with bone graft.

Sergio Rudelli1, David Uip, Emerson Honda, Ana Lucia L M Lima.   

Abstract

There are many different opinions in the literature regarding the best procedure for revision of infected hip arthroplasty and hence in achieving long-term stabilization of a new implant. Thirty-two patients with 32 loose and infected total hip arthroplasties underwent revision with a bone graft in a 1-stage procedure. The bone graft was used in the acetabulum and femur in 25 patients, in the acetabulum alone in 4 patients and in the femur alone in 3 patients. A metal mesh was necessary in 15 patients to contain the morselized bone graft. At the time of surgical revision, 9 patients had a draining sinus, 6 had a closed sinus, and 17 had never had sinuses in the surgical wound. Antibiotic therapy was administered intravenously and orally for 6 months. Mean follow-up was 103 months (range, 63-183 months), and infection recurred in 2 (6.2%) cases. Further studies are necessary, and continuation of this method is justified.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2008        PMID: 18534510     DOI: 10.1016/j.arth.2007.08.010

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Arthroplasty        ISSN: 0883-5403            Impact factor:   4.757


  28 in total

Review 1.  Infection in total hip replacement: meta-analysis.

Authors:  Surendra Senthi; Jacob T Munro; Rocco P Pitto
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2010-11-18       Impact factor: 3.075

2.  Assessing the gold standard: a review of 253 two-stage revisions for infected TKA.

Authors:  Tahir Mahmud; Matthew C Lyons; Douglas D Naudie; Steven J Macdonald; Richard W McCalden
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2012-10       Impact factor: 4.176

3.  Two-stage revision for infected total knee arthroplasty: our experience with interval prosthesis.

Authors:  N Prasad; V Paringe; R Kotwal; A Ghandour; R Morgan Jones
Journal:  Eur J Orthop Surg Traumatol       Date:  2013-12-05

4.  What is the Long-term Economic Societal Effect of Periprosthetic Infections After THA? A Markov Analysis.

Authors:  Thomas J Parisi; Joseph F Konopka; Hany S Bedair
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2017-04-07       Impact factor: 4.176

Review 5.  The Role of One-Stage Exchange for Prosthetic Joint Infection.

Authors:  Fiachra E Rowan; Matthew J Donaldson; Jurek R Pietrzak; Fares S Haddad
Journal:  Curr Rev Musculoskelet Med       Date:  2018-09

6.  Pre-operative scoring system to determine the surgical strategy for periprosthetic hip infection.

Authors:  Kenichi Oe; Hirokazu Iida; Narumi Ueda; Tomohisa Nakamura; Naofumi Okamoto; Yusuke Ueda
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2014-08-17       Impact factor: 3.075

7.  Routine one-stage exchange for chronic infection after total hip replacement.

Authors:  Jean-Yves Jenny; Régis Lengert; Yann Diesinger; Jeannot Gaudias; Cyril Boeri; Jean-François Kempf
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2014-07-31       Impact factor: 3.075

8.  Partial two-stage exchange for infected total hip arthroplasty: a preliminary report.

Authors:  Timothy E Ekpo; Keith R Berend; Michael J Morris; Joanne B Adams; Adolph V Lombardi
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2014-02       Impact factor: 4.176

Review 9.  Prosthetic joint infection.

Authors:  Aaron J Tande; Robin Patel
Journal:  Clin Microbiol Rev       Date:  2014-04       Impact factor: 26.132

Review 10.  Revision of late periprosthetic infections of total hip endoprostheses: pros and cons of different concepts.

Authors:  Bernd Fink
Journal:  Int J Med Sci       Date:  2009-09-04       Impact factor: 3.738

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.