Literature DB >> 1853447

Adverse reactions in patients transfused with cryopreserved marrow.

D F Stroncek1, S K Fautsch, L C Lasky, D D Hurd, N K Ramsay, J McCullough.   

Abstract

Marrow is cryopreserved for use in autologous bone marrow transplants, but little is known of the incidence of reactions in patients transfused with these cryopreserved marrows. Reactions in patients transfused during a 4-year period with 134 autologous marrows cryopreserved in dimethyl sulfoxide (DMSO) were compared with those in patients transfused with marrow that had been collected from HLA-compatible donors and that had not been cryopreserved. Patients transfused with cryopreserved marrow had significantly more nausea (44.8 vs. 14.1%; p less than 0.0005), vomiting (23.9 vs. 8.5%; p less than 0.01), chills (31.3 vs. 1.4%; p less than 0.0005), and fever (17.9 vs. 0%; p less than 0.005) than patients transfused with fresh allogeneic marrow. The incidence of emesis correlated with the dose of DMSO received, but that of nausea did not. All cryopreserved marrows were cultured for bacteria at the time of transfusion and 17 (12.7%) were found to be positive. Only 1 of the 17 patients transfused with culture-positive marrow developed sepsis during the transplant course with the same organism that was present in the transfused marrow. Although the reactions in donors transfused with cryopreserved marrow were readily treated, this study suggests that the incidence of some reactions might be decreased by reducing the dose of DMSO transfused. Bacterial contamination of transfused marrow was a worrisome complication, and efforts should be made to improve marrow collection and processing techniques to minimize that risk.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1991        PMID: 1853447     DOI: 10.1046/j.1537-2995.1991.31691306250.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Transfusion        ISSN: 0041-1132            Impact factor:   3.157


  18 in total

1.  Preservation of stem cells.

Authors:  Jacob Hanna; Allison Hubel
Journal:  Organogenesis       Date:  2009-07       Impact factor: 2.500

2.  Packaging Considerations for Biopreservation.

Authors:  Erik J Woods; Sreedhar Thirumala
Journal:  Transfus Med Hemother       Date:  2011-03-16       Impact factor: 3.747

3.  Adverse reactions during stem cell infusion in children treated with autologous and allogeneic stem cell transplantation.

Authors:  T H Truong; R Moorjani; D Dewey; G M T Guilcher; N L Prokopishyn; V A Lewis
Journal:  Bone Marrow Transplant       Date:  2016-01-11       Impact factor: 5.483

4.  Limiting the daily total nucleated cell dose of cryopreserved peripheral blood stem cell products for autologous transplantation improves infusion-related safety with no adverse impact on hematopoietic engraftment.

Authors:  Nandita Khera; Jack Jinneman; Barry E Storer; Shelly Heimfeld; Megan M O'Meara; Thomas R Chauncey; Stephanie J Lee; Michael Linenberger
Journal:  Biol Blood Marrow Transplant       Date:  2011-06-15       Impact factor: 5.742

5.  Contamination of bone marrow transplants from peripheral blood.

Authors:  M Farrington; I Matthews; R Marcus; M A Scott; E Caffrey; C J Hunt
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  1994-10-08

Review 6.  Hematopoietic SCT with cryopreserved grafts: adverse reactions after transplantation and cryoprotectant removal before infusion.

Authors:  Z Shu; S Heimfeld; D Gao
Journal:  Bone Marrow Transplant       Date:  2013-09-30       Impact factor: 5.483

7.  Processing and cryopreservation of placental/umbilical cord blood for unrelated bone marrow reconstitution.

Authors:  P Rubinstein; L Dobrila; R E Rosenfield; J W Adamson; G Migliaccio; A R Migliaccio; P E Taylor; C E Stevens
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  1995-10-24       Impact factor: 11.205

8.  Cytotoxic effects of dimethyl sulphoxide (DMSO) on cochlear organotypic cultures.

Authors:  Weidong Qi; Dalian Ding; Richard J Salvi
Journal:  Hear Res       Date:  2007-12-15       Impact factor: 3.208

9.  Preservation of differentiation and clonogenic potential of human hematopoietic stem and progenitor cells during lyophilization and ambient storage.

Authors:  Sandhya S Buchanan; David W Pyatt; John F Carpenter
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2010-09-01       Impact factor: 3.240

10.  Dimethyl sulfoxide (DMSO) produces widespread apoptosis in the developing central nervous system.

Authors:  Jennifer L Hanslick; Karen Lau; Kevin K Noguchi; John W Olney; Charles F Zorumski; Steven Mennerick; Nuri B Farber
Journal:  Neurobiol Dis       Date:  2008-12-03       Impact factor: 5.996

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.