Literature DB >> 18534428

Primary and revision arthroplasty surgery caseloads in the United States from 1990 to 2004.

Steven M Kurtz1, Kevin L Ong, Jordana Schmier, Ke Zhao, Fionna Mowat, Edmund Lau.   

Abstract

We analyzed the temporal changes in the caseload of primary and revision hip and knee arthroplasty surgeons in the United States between 1990 and 2004. The Nationwide Inpatient Sample was used to identify arthroplasty procedures and the surgeons who performed them. Annual caseloads were analyzed for each procedure; 47% +/- 2% and 39% +/- 2% of hip and knee surgeons performed revisions nationwide. Average revision caseloads increased slightly over time at a rate of 1.2 and 1.4 cases per surgeon per decade for total hip arthroplasty (THA) and total knee arthroplasty (TKA), respectively. The caseload of primary THA and TKA increased by 1.4 and 1.7 cases per surgeon per decade. The caseload for the top 5% of primary THA and TKA surgeons increased from 25 to 45 and 33 to 86, respectively, during this period compared with the median caseload, which increased from 4 to 5 (hip) and 5 to 10 (knee). The revision caseload of surgeons has increased over time, particularly for surgeons with the highest caseloads.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2008        PMID: 18534428     DOI: 10.1016/j.arth.2007.11.015

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Arthroplasty        ISSN: 0883-5403            Impact factor:   4.757


  48 in total

1.  Perioperative clopidogrel and postoperative events after hip and knee arthroplasties.

Authors:  Sumon Nandi; Mehran Aghazadeh; Carl Talmo; Claire Robbins; James Bono
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2012-03-09       Impact factor: 4.176

2.  Results of sleeves in revision total knee arthroplasty: an editorial comment on recently published in the Journal of Arthroplasty.

Authors:  Chao Jiang; Wenwei Qian
Journal:  Ann Transl Med       Date:  2015-11

3.  Effect of Comprehensive Behavioral and Exercise Intervention on Physical Function and Activity Participation After Total Knee Replacement: A Pilot Randomized Study.

Authors:  Sara R Piva; Gustavo J Almeida; Alexandra B Gil; Anthony M DiGioia; Diane L Helsel; Gwendolyn A Sowa
Journal:  Arthritis Care Res (Hoboken)       Date:  2017-11-02       Impact factor: 4.794

Review 4.  Surgical treatment options in patients with impaired bone quality.

Authors:  Norman A Johanson; Jody Litrenta; Jay M Zampini; Frederic Kleinbart; Haviva M Goldman
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2011-08       Impact factor: 4.176

Review 5.  Acetabular defect classification in times of 3D imaging and patient-specific treatment protocols.

Authors:  K Horas; J Arnholdt; A F Steinert; M Hoberg; M Rudert; B M Holzapfel
Journal:  Orthopade       Date:  2017-02       Impact factor: 1.087

6.  [Acetabular revision arthroplasty : Current concepts and new developments].

Authors:  B M Holzapfel; M Rudert
Journal:  Orthopade       Date:  2017-02       Impact factor: 1.087

7.  Length of stay and inpatient mortality trends in primary and revision total joint arthroplasty in the United States, 2000-2014.

Authors:  Matthew Sloan; Neil P Sheth
Journal:  J Orthop       Date:  2018-05-07

Review 8.  Acetabular reinforcement rings associated with allograft for severe acetabular defects.

Authors:  Emmanuel Gibon; Luc Kerboull; Jean-Pierre Courpied; Moussa Hamadouche
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2018-09-13       Impact factor: 3.075

9.  Has the rate of in-hospital infections after total joint arthroplasty decreased?

Authors:  Mohammad R Rasouli; Mitchell Gil Maltenfort; James J Purtill; William J Hozack; Javad Parvizi
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2013-10       Impact factor: 4.176

Review 10.  Centers for Disease Control and Prevention 2017 Guidelines for Prevention of Surgical Site Infections: Review and Relevant Recommendations.

Authors:  K Keely Boyle; Sridhar Rachala; Scott R Nodzo
Journal:  Curr Rev Musculoskelet Med       Date:  2018-09
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.