Literature DB >> 18534424

Evaluation of the accuracy and use of x-ray markers in digital templating for total hip arthroplasty.

Christopher O Bayne1, Michael Krosin, Thomas C Barber.   

Abstract

Despite benefits of digital templating, digital image acquisition techniques often make image magnification unknown and variable. We assessed the accuracy of digital x-ray scaling devices based on position. Radiographs of 106 total hip arthroplasty (THA) patients were studied to determine the accuracy of 2 digital x-ray markers at 1 of 4 positions by comparing true to expected x-ray magnification. The Pearson r coefficient was calculated as an indicator of measurement correlation between investigators. Greater accuracy was obtained for markers placed at the greater trochanter without skin overlap than for markers placed with soft tissue or bone overlap on x-ray. Flexible positioning markers provided greater accuracy than adhesive markers. Based on our data, we suggest positioning at the greater trochanter without skin overlap on x-ray and suggest flexible positioning over adhesive marker use.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2008        PMID: 18534424     DOI: 10.1016/j.arth.2007.11.020

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Arthroplasty        ISSN: 0883-5403            Impact factor:   4.757


  8 in total

1.  Dual-position calibration markers for total hip arthroplasty: theoretical comparison to fixed calibration and single marker method.

Authors:  Christoph Kolja Boese; Sebastian Wilhelm; Stefan Haneder; Philipp Lechler; Peer Eysel; Jan Bredow
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2018-06-20       Impact factor: 3.075

2.  Digital templating in total knee and hip replacement: an analysis of planning accuracy.

Authors:  Bettina Kniesel; Lukas Konstantinidis; Anja Hirschmüller; Norbert Südkamp; Peter Helwig
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2013-10-27       Impact factor: 3.075

3.  The accuracy of external calibration markers in digital templating using the double marker and single marker method: a comparative study.

Authors:  Y Warschawski; I Shichman; S Morgan; O Shaked; S Garceau; N Amzallag; N Snir; A Gold
Journal:  Arch Orthop Trauma Surg       Date:  2020-08-13       Impact factor: 3.067

4.  Calibration Markers for Digital Templating in Total Hip Arthroplasty.

Authors:  Christoph Kolja Boese; Philipp Lechler; Leonard Rose; Jens Dargel; Johannes Oppermann; Peer Eysel; Hansjörg Geiges; Jan Bredow
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2015-07-13       Impact factor: 3.240

5.  Implications of component size and calibration error on digital templating for total hip arthroplasty. A visual matrix from a simple mathematical model.

Authors:  Christoph Kolja Boese; Tim Rolvien; Matthias Trost; Michael Frink; Jan Hubert; Frank Timo Beil; Christian Ries
Journal:  Int J Comput Assist Radiol Surg       Date:  2021-04-17       Impact factor: 2.924

6.  Is analog preoperative planning still applicable?-comparison of accuracy of analog and computer preoperative planning methods in total hip arthroplasty.

Authors:  Julian Dutka; Slawomir Kiepura; Mateusz Bukowczan
Journal:  Ann Transl Med       Date:  2021-05

7.  Magnification of digital hip radiographs differs between clinical workplaces.

Authors:  Jana Hornová; Pavel Růžička; Maroš Hrubina; Eduard Šťastný; Andrea Košková; Petr Fulín; Jiří Gallo; Matej Daniel
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2017-11-30       Impact factor: 3.240

8.  Evaluation of Tilt-correction of Anteversion on Anteroposterior Pelvic Radiographs in Total Hip Arthroplasty.

Authors:  Jeffrey M Muir; John Vincent; Joseph Schipper; Meinusha Govindarajan; Wayne G Paprosky
Journal:  Cureus       Date:  2018-05-18
  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.