Literature DB >> 18534419

A comparison of the outcome of cemented all-polyethylene and cementless metal-backed acetabular sockets in primary total hip arthroplasty.

George Hartofilakidis1, George Georgiades, George C Babis.   

Abstract

We compared, after a 10-year-minimum follow-up, the outcome of 50 cemented all-polyethylene Charnley acetabular sockets with that of 51 cementless metal-backed sockets in 2 comparable cohorts of young patients. Although the revision rate for the cemented and cementless group was 28% and 35%, respectively, the revision rate for aseptic loosening was 28% for the cemented and 12% for the cementless group. The mean polyethylene wear was 0.112 and 0.114 mm/y, respectively, for the 2 groups. Linear osteolysis was observed in 18 of 50 cemented sockets. Expansile osteolysis presented in 10 of 51 cementless sockets and only in one of the cemented sockets. In conclusion, cementless components had more durable fixation than cemented components. However, they presented more aggressive expansile osteolysis caused by the coexistence of polyethylene and metal debris.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2008        PMID: 18534419     DOI: 10.1016/j.arth.2007.11.010

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Arthroplasty        ISSN: 0883-5403            Impact factor:   4.757


  8 in total

Review 1.  Is there evidence for a superior method of socket fixation in hip arthroplasty? A systematic review.

Authors:  Dean Pakvis; Gijs van Hellemondt; Enrico de Visser; Wilco Jacobs; Maarten Spruit
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2011-03-15       Impact factor: 3.075

Review 2.  Is there evidence for accelerated polyethylene wear in uncemented compared to cemented acetabular components? A systematic review of the literature.

Authors:  Hugo C van der Veen; Hans-Peter W van Jonbergen; Rudolf W Poolman; Sjoerd K Bulstra; Jos J A M van Raay
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2012-12-11       Impact factor: 3.075

3.  The Ganz acetabular reinforcement ring shows excellent long-term results when used as a primary implant: a retrospective analysis of two hundred and forty primary total hip arthroplasties with a minimum follow-up of twenty years.

Authors:  Marc C Attinger; Pascal C Haefeli; Henrik C Bäcker; Remy Flueckiger; Peter M Ballmer; Klaus A Siebenrock; Frank M Klenke
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2019-01-20       Impact factor: 3.075

4.  The Current Concepts of Total Hip Arthroplasty.

Authors:  Joong-Myung Lee
Journal:  Hip Pelvis       Date:  2016-12-28

5.  Total hip replacement: A meta-analysis to evaluate survival of cemented, cementless and hybrid implants.

Authors:  Phedy Phedy; H Dilogo Ismail; Charles Hoo; Yoshi P Djaja
Journal:  World J Orthop       Date:  2017-02-18

6.  Systematic review of the clinical effectiveness for long-term follow-up of total hip arthroplasty.

Authors:  Lindsay K Smith; Emma Dures; A D Beswick
Journal:  Orthop Res Rev       Date:  2019-07-02

7.  Analysis of the Risk of Wear on Cemented and Uncemented Polyethylene Liners According to Different Variables in Hip Arthroplasty.

Authors:  Basilio De la Torre; Loreto Barrios; Juan De la Torre-Mosquera; Julia Bujan; Miguel A Ortega; Carlos González-Bravo
Journal:  Materials (Basel)       Date:  2021-11-27       Impact factor: 3.623

8.  Cemented versus uncemented fixation in total hip replacement: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.

Authors:  Ali Abdulkarim; Prasad Ellanti; Nicola Motterlini; Tom Fahey; John M O'Byrne
Journal:  Orthop Rev (Pavia)       Date:  2013-03-15
  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.