Literature DB >> 18534113

Aesthetic issues in spatial composition: effects of position and direction on framing single objects.

Stephen E Palmer1, Jonathan S Gardner, Thomas D Wickens.   

Abstract

Artists who work in two-dimensional visual media regularly face the problem of how to compose their subjects in aesthetically pleasing ways within a surrounding rectangular frame. We performed psychophysical investigations of viewers' aesthetic preferences for the position and facing direction of single, directed objects (e.g. people, cars, teapots and flowers) within such rectangular frames. Preferences were measured using two-alternative forced-choice preference judgments, the method of adjustment, and free choice in taking photographs. In front-facing conditions, preference was greatest for pictures whose subject was located at or near the center of the frame and decreased monotonically and symmetrically with distance from the center (the center bias). In the left- or right-facing conditions, there was an additional preference for objects to face into rather than out of the frame (the inward bias). Similar biases were evident using a method of adjustment, in which participants positioned objects along a horizontal axis, and in free choice photographs, in which participants were asked to take 'the most aesthetically pleasing picture' they could of everyday objects. The results are discussed as affirming the power of the center and facing direction in the aesthetic biases viewers bring to their appreciation of framed works of visual art (e.g. Alexander, 2002; Arnheim, 1988).

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2008        PMID: 18534113     DOI: 10.1163/156856808784532662

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Spat Vis        ISSN: 0169-1015


  14 in total

Review 1.  Anticlockwise or clockwise? A dynamic Perception-Action-Laterality model for directionality bias in visuospatial functioning.

Authors:  A K M Rezaul Karim; Michael J Proulx; Lora T Likova
Journal:  Neurosci Biobehav Rev       Date:  2016-06-24       Impact factor: 8.989

2.  Accounting for taste: individual differences in preference for harmony.

Authors:  Stephen E Palmer; William S Griscom
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2013-06

3.  Canonical visual size for real-world objects.

Authors:  Talia Konkle; Aude Oliva
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform       Date:  2011-02       Impact factor: 3.332

Review 4.  Do we enjoy what we sense and perceive? A dissociation between aesthetic appreciation and basic perception of environmental objects or events.

Authors:  A K M Rezaul Karim; Michael J Proulx; Alexandra A de Sousa; Lora T Likova
Journal:  Cogn Affect Behav Neurosci       Date:  2022-05-19       Impact factor: 3.526

5.  Haptic aesthetics in the blind: A behavioral and fMRI investigation.

Authors:  A K M Rezaul Karim; Lora T Likova
Journal:  IS&T Int Symp Electron Imaging       Date:  2018

6.  Aesthetic judgment of triangular shape: compactness and not the golden ratio determines perceived attractiveness.

Authors:  Jay Friedenberg
Journal:  Iperception       Date:  2012-03-16

7.  Aesthetic preference for spatial composition in multiobject pictures.

Authors:  Mieke H R Leyssen; Sarah Linsen; Jonathan Sammartino; Stephen E Palmer
Journal:  Iperception       Date:  2012-01-20

8.  The effect of left-right reversal on film: Watching Kurosawa reversed.

Authors:  Marco Bertamini; Carole Bode; Nicola Bruno
Journal:  Iperception       Date:  2011-09-15

9.  Seeing and liking: biased perception of ambiguous figures consistent with the "inward bias" in aesthetic preferences.

Authors:  Yi-Chia Chen; Brian J Scholl
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2014-12

10.  Structural imbalance promotes behavior analogous to aesthetic preference in domestic chicks.

Authors:  Mark A Elliott; Orsola Rosa Salva; Paul Mulcahy; Lucia Regolin
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2012-08-14       Impact factor: 3.240

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.